Cited by 26Digital Media Forensic DetectionGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisMisinformation and Its Impacts

DeePhy: On Deepfake Phylogeny

Open access
Narayan, Kartik, Agarwal, Harsh, Thakral, Kartik, Mittal, Surbhi, Vatsa, Mayank, Singh, Richa·2022·2022 IEEE International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB)

Abstract

Deepfake refers to tailored and synthetically generated videos which are now prevalent and spreading on a large scale, threatening the trustworthiness of the information available online. While existing datasets contain different kinds of deepfakes which vary in their generation technique, they do not consider progression of deepfakes in a “phylogenetic” manner. It is possible that an existing deepfake face is swapped with another face. This process of face swapping can be performed multiple times and the resultant deepfake can be evolved to confuse the deepfake detection algorithms. Further, many databases do not provide the employed generative model as target labels. Model attribution helps in enhancing the explainability of the detection results by providing information on the generative model employed. In order to enable the research community to address these questions, this paper proposes DeePhy, a novel Deepfake Phylogeny dataset which consists of 5040 deep-fake videos generated using three different generation techniques. There are 840 videos of one-time swapped deep-fakes, 2520 videos of two-times swapped deepfakes and 1680 videos of three-times swapped deepfakes. With over 30 GBs in size, the database is prepared in over 1100 hours using 18 GPUs of 1,352 GB cumulative memory. We also present the benchmark on DeePhy dataset using six deep-fake detection algorithms. The results highlight the need to evolve the research of model attribution of deepfakes and generalize the process over a variety of deepfake generation techniques. The database is available at: http://iab-rubric.org/deephy-database

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/ijcb54206.2022.10007968

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only a few datasets like OpenForensics, DF-Platter, and DeeShy attempt to involve challenging scenarios such as multiple fake faces in an image or video, low-quality deepfakes, or face occlusion.

    “Only a few datasets like OpenForensics [31], DF-Platter [44], and DeeShy [43] attempt to involve challenging scenarios such as multiple fake faces in an image or video, low-quality DFs, or face occlusion.”

    From Deepfake detection across image, video, and audio: a comprehensive survey with empirical evaluation of generalization and robustness (2026) · cites this paper as [43]

    The Dataset Statistics and Annotation and Diversity sections describe DeePhy as a deepfake dataset with face occlusion, supporting it as an example of a dataset involving a challenging scenario. The citing sentence calls it “DeeShy,” whereas the cited paper names its dataset “DeePhy.” The paper does not present DeePhy as a dataset of multiple fake faces in one frame or low-quality deepfakes. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. H. H. Nguyen, J. Yamagishi, and I. Echizen, "Use of a capsule network to detect fake images and videos," arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.12467, 2019. 3, 6, 7 · arXiv
  2. A. Rossler, D. Cozzolino, L. Verdoliva, C. Riess, J. Thies, and M. Nießner, "Faceforensics++: Learning to detect ma- nipulated facial images," in IEEE/CVF ICCV, pp. 1-11, 2019. 3, 5
  3. Y. Li and S. Lyu, "Exposing deepfake videos by detecting face warping artifacts," in IEEE/CVF CVPRW, 2019. 6
  4. S. Sabour, N. Frosst, and G. E. Hinton, "Dynamic routing be- tween capsules," Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 30, 2017. 6

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Narayan, K., Agarwal, H., Thakral, K., Mittal, S., Vatsa, M., & Singh, R.
Affiliations
  • Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur (IN)
  • IIT Jodhpur,India
Venue
2022 IEEE International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2022-10-10
Pages
1-10
OpenAlex
W4316924313
Cited by
26
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6
FWCI
1.90
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
Keywords
deepfake detection, face swapping, deepfake datasets, synthetic video

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review