Cited by 349Digital Media Forensic DetectionAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques

Recasting Residual-based Local Descriptors as Convolutional Neural Networks: an Application to Image Forgery Detection

Cozzolino, Davide, Poggi, Giovanni, Verdoliva, Luisa·2017·Proceedings of the 5th ACM Workshop on Information Hiding and Multimedia Security

Abstract

Local descriptors based on the image noise residual have proven extremely effective for a number of forensic applications, like forgery detection and localization. Nonetheless, motivated by promising results in computer vision, the focus of the research community is now shifting on deep learning. In this paper we show that a class of residual-based descriptors can be actually regarded as a simple constrained convolutional neural network (CNN). Then, by relaxing the constraints, and fine-tuning the net on a relatively small training set, we obtain a significant performance improvement with respect to the conventional detector.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3082031.3083247

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cozzolino, D., Poggi, G., & Verdoliva, L.
Affiliations
University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Venue
Proceedings of the 5th ACM Workshop on Information Hiding and Multimedia Security
Publisher
ACM
Published
2017-06-20
Pages
159-164
OpenAlex
W2603123944
Cited by
349
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 2
FWCI
6.79
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM Workshop on Information Hiding and Multimedia Security (IH&MMSec) (publishedVersion)
Funders
Defense Advanced Re search Projects Agency (FA8750-16-2-0204)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Keywords
fine-tuning, image forgery detection, image localization, forensic image analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review