Cited by 14Autonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationReinforcement Learning in Robotics

Deep Grid Net (DGN): A Deep Learning System for Real-Time Driving Context Understanding

Open access
Marina, Liviu Alexandru, Trasnea, Bogdan, Cocias, Tiberiu, Vasilcoi, Andrei, Moldoveanu, Florin, Grigorescu, Sorin Mihai·2019·2019 Third IEEE International Conference on Robotic Computing (IRC)

Abstract

Grid maps obtained from fused sensory information are nowadays among the most popular approaches for motion planning for autonomous driving cars. In this paper, we introduce Deep Grid Net (DGN), deep learning (DL) system designed for understanding the context in which an autonomous car is driving. DGN incorporates a learned driving environment representation based on Occupancy Grids (OG) obtained from raw Lidar data and constructed on top of the Dempster-Shafer (DS) theory. The predicted driving context is further used for switching between different driving strategies implemented within EB robinos, Elektrobit's Autonomous Driving (AD) software platform. Based on genetic algorithms (GAs), we also propose a neuroevolutionary approach for learning the tuning hyperparameters of DGN. The performance of the proposed deep network has been evaluated against similar competing driving context estimation classifiers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/irc.2019.00073

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. C. Seeger, A. Mller, and L. Schwarz, "Towards Road Type Classification with Occupancy Grids," in Intelligent Vehicles Symposium -Workshop: DeepDriving -Learning Representations for Intelligent Vehicles, IEEE, Gothenburg, Sweden, July 2016.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marina, L. A., Trasnea, B., Cocias, T., Vasilcoi, A., Moldoveanu, F., & Grigorescu, S. M.
Affiliations
Transilvania University of Brașov (RO)
Venue
2019 Third IEEE International Conference on Robotic Computing (IRC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-02
Pages
399-402
OpenAlex
W2909626933
Cited by
14
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3
FWCI
1.99
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE International Conference on Robotic Computing (IRC) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
Keywords
autonomous driving, occupancy grid, Dempster-Shafer theory, LiDAR, grid map, neuroevolution, genetic algorithm, hyperparameter optimization, real-time perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review