Cited by 116Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsAutonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyRobotic Path Planning Algorithms

Watch this: Scalable cost-function learning for path planning in urban environments

Open access
Wulfmeier, Markus, Wang, Dominic Zeng, Posner, Ingmar·2016·2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)

Abstract

In this work, we present an approach to learn cost maps for driving in complex urban environments from a large number of demonstrations of human driving behaviour. The learned cost maps are constructed directly from raw sensor measurements, bypassing the effort of manually designing cost maps as well as features. When deploying the cost maps, the trajectories generated not only replicate human-like driving behaviour but are also demonstrably robust against systematic errors in putative robot configuration. To achieve this we deploy a Maximum Entropy based, non-linear IRL framework which uses Fully Convolutional Neural Networks (FCNs) to represent the cost model underlying expert driving behaviour. Using a deep, parametric approach enables us to scale efficiently to large datasets and complex behaviours while being run-time independent of dataset extent during deployment. We demonstrate scalability and performance on an ambitious dataset collected over the course of one year including more than 25k demonstration trajectories extracted from over 120km of driving and 13 different drivers. We evaluate against a carefully designed cost map and, in addition, demonstrate robustness to systematic errors by learning precise cost-maps even in the presence of system calibration perturbations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iros.2016.7759328

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A solution to the biased simulation problem is to use Imitation Learning methods, such as Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL), to learn from human driving demonstrations without needing to explore unsafe actions.

    “A solution here is to use Imitation Learning methods, such as Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) [27], to learn from human driving demonstrations without needing to explore unsafe actions.”

    From A survey of deep learning techniques for autonomous driving (2020) · cites this paper as [27]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Michael Montemerlo, Jan Becker, Suhrid Bhat, Hendrik Dahlkamp, Dmitri Dolgov, Scott Ettinger, Dirk Haehnel, Tim Hilden, Gabe Hoffmann, Burkhard Huhnke, et al. Junior: The stanford entry in the urban challenge. Journal of field Robotics, 25(9):569-597, 2008.
  2. Pierre Sermanet, Raia Hadsell Marco Scoffier, Matt Grimes, Jan Ben, Ayse Erkan, Chris Crudele, Urs Muller, and Yann Lecun. A multi- range architecture for collision-free off-road robot navigation. Journal of Field Robotics.
  3. Steven M LaValle. Planning algorithms. Cambridge university press, 2006.
  4. Kyriacos Shiarlis, Joao Messias, Maarten van Someren, and Shimon Whiteson. Inverse Reinforcement Learning from Failure. In Robotics: Science an Systems Conference: Workshop on Learning from Demon- stration. 2015.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wulfmeier, M., Wang, D. Z., & Posner, I.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2016-10
Pages
2089-2095
ISSN
2153-0858 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2486052342
Cited by
116
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4
FWCI
6.47
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/M019918/1, EP/I005021/1, EP/K034472/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
Keywords
inverse reinforcement learning, path planning, urban driving, maximum entropy, fully convolutional network, autonomous driving, sensor measurements, scalability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review