Cited by 60Robotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationAdvanced Neural Network Applications3D Shape Modeling and Analysis

Deep semantic classification for 3D LiDAR data

Open access
Dewan, Ayush, Oliveira, Gabriel L., Burgard, Wolfram·2017·2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)

Abstract

Robots are expected to operate autonomously in dynamic environments. Understanding the underlying dynamic characteristics of objects is a key enabler for achieving this goal. In this paper, we propose a method for pointwise semantic classification of 3D LiDAR data into three classes: non-movable, movable and dynamic. We concentrate on understanding these specific semantics because they characterize important information required for an autonomous system. To learn the distinction between movable and non-movable points in the environment, we introduce an approach based on deep neural network and for detecting the dynamic points, we estimate pointwise motion. We propose a Bayes filter framework for combining the learned semantic cues with the motion cues to infer the required semantic classification. In extensive experiments, we compare our approach with other methods on a standard benchmark dataset and report competitive results in comparison to the existing state-of-the-art. Furthermore, we show an improvement in the classification of points by combining the semantic cues retrieved from the neural network with the motion cues.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iros.2017.8206198

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and G. Hinton. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 25, pages 1097-1105. 2012.
  2. Tayyab Naseer, Benjamin Suger, Michael Ruhnke, and Wolfram Burgard. Vision-based markov localization across large perceptual changes. In Proc. of the IEEE European Conference on Mobile Robots (ECMR), 2015.
  3. Karen Simonyan and Andrew Zisserman. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2015.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dewan, A., Oliveira, G. L., & Burgard, W.
Affiliations
University of Freiburg (DE)
Venue
2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2017-09
Pages
3544-3549
ISSN
2153-0858 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2705009888
Cited by
60
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
15.32
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
European Commission (610532)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Keywords
3D LiDAR, moving object detection, Bayesian filtering, deep neural network, autonomous robots, dynamic environments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review