Cited by 108Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingBlockchain Technology in Education and Learning

A Microservice-enabled Architecture for Smart Surveillance using Blockchain Technology

Open access
Nagothu, Deeraj, Xu, Ronghua, Nikouei, Seyed Yahya, Chen, Yu·2018·2018 IEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2)

Abstract

While the smart surveillance system enhanced by the Internet of Things (IoT) technology becomes an essential part of Smart Cities, it also brings new concerns in security of the data. Compared to the traditional surveillance systems that is built following a monolithic architecture to carry out lower level operations, such as monitoring and recording, the modern surveillance systems are expected to support more scalable and decentralized solutions for advanced video stream analysis at the large volumes of distributed edge devices. In addition, the centralized architecture of the conventional surveillance systems is vulnerable to single point of failure and privacy breach owning to the lack of protection to the surveillance feed. This position paper introduces a novel secure smart surveillance system based on microservices architecture and blockchain technology. Encapsulating the video analysis algorithms as various independent microservices not only isolates the video feed from different sectors, but also improve the system availability and robustness by decentralizing the operations. The blockchain technology securely synchronizes the video analysis databases among microservices across surveillance domains, and provides tamper proof of data in the trustless network environment. Smart contract enabled access authorization strategy prevents any unauthorized user from accessing the microservices and offers a scalable, decentralized and fine-grained access control solution for smart surveillance systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/isc2.2018.8656968

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This blockchain feature enables various secure and reliable operations without having a trusted party in the distributed system.

    “This blockchain feature enables various secure and reliable operations without having a trusted party in the distributed system [64].”

    From A Survey of Video Surveillance Systems in Smart City (2023) · cites this paper as [64]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nagothu, D., Xu, R., Nikouei, S. Y., & Chen, Y.
Affiliations
Binghamton University (US)
Venue
2018 IEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-09
Pages
1-4
OpenAlex
W2886467254
Cited by
108
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 4
FWCI
11.58
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
Keywords
intelligent surveillance, microservices, blockchain, Internet of Things, smart cities, video stream analysis, edge devices, decentralized systems, data security, privacy, smart contracts, access control, tamper-proof data, single point of failure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review