A Microservice-enabled Architecture for Smart Surveillance using Blockchain Technology
Open accessAbstract
While the smart surveillance system enhanced by the Internet of Things (IoT) technology becomes an essential part of Smart Cities, it also brings new concerns in security of the data. Compared to the traditional surveillance systems that is built following a monolithic architecture to carry out lower level operations, such as monitoring and recording, the modern surveillance systems are expected to support more scalable and decentralized solutions for advanced video stream analysis at the large volumes of distributed edge devices. In addition, the centralized architecture of the conventional surveillance systems is vulnerable to single point of failure and privacy breach owning to the lack of protection to the surveillance feed. This position paper introduces a novel secure smart surveillance system based on microservices architecture and blockchain technology. Encapsulating the video analysis algorithms as various independent microservices not only isolates the video feed from different sectors, but also improve the system availability and robustness by decentralizing the operations. The blockchain technology securely synchronizes the video analysis databases among microservices across surveillance domains, and provides tamper proof of data in the trustless network environment. Smart contract enabled access authorization strategy prevents any unauthorized user from accessing the microservices and offers a scalable, decentralized and fine-grained access control solution for smart surveillance systems.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This blockchain feature enables various secure and reliable operations without having a trusted party in the distributed system.
“This blockchain feature enables various secure and reliable operations without having a trusted party in the distributed system [64].”
From A Survey of Video Surveillance Systems in Smart City (2023) · cites this paper as [64]
Cites
Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash SystemPreprint
Nakamoto, S. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3440802 · Cited by 14,600 · see citing works
Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash SystemPreprint
Squarepants, S. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3977007 · Cited by 11,146 · see citing works
(2015) · Cited by 3,471 · see citing works
Formalizing and Securing Relationships on Public Networks
Szabo, N. (1997) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v2i9.548 · Cited by 2,158 · see citing works
Smart contract-based access control for the internet of things
Zhang, Y., Kasahara, S., Shen, Y., Jiang, X., & Wan, J. (2019) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2018.2847705 · Cited by 788 · see citing works
Fairaccess: a new blockchain-based access control framework for the internet of things
Ouaddah, A., Abou Elkalam, A., & Ait Ouahman, A. (2016) · Security and Communication Networks · doi:10.1002/sec.1748 · Cited by 688 · see citing works
Designing a Smart City Internet of Things Platform with Microservice Architecture
Krylovskiy, A., Jahn, M., & Patti, E. (2015) · International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud (FiCloud) · doi:10.1109/ficloud.2015.55 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
BlendCAC: A BLockchain-Enabled Decentralized Capability-Based Access Control for IoTs
Xu, R., Chen, Y., Blasch, E., & Chen, G. (2018) · IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things (iThings) and IEEE Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom) and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing (CPSCom) and IEEE Smart Data (SmartData) · doi:10.1109/cybermatics_2018.2018.00191 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Self-citationXu, R., Chen, Y., Blasch, E., & Chen, G. (2018) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers7030039 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Self-citationReal-Time Human Detection as an Edge Service Enabled by a Lightweight CNN
Nikouei, S. Y., Chen, Y., Song, S., et al. (2018) · IEEE International Conference on Edge Computing (EDGE) · doi:10.1109/edge.2018.00025 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Self-citationReal-Time Human Objects Tracking for Smart Surveillance at the Edge
Xu, R., Nikouei, S. Y., Chen, Y., Polunchenko, A. S., Song, S., Deng, C., & Faughnan, T. R. (2018) · International Conference on Communications · doi:10.1109/icc.2018.8422970 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Self-citationEnabling Smart Urban Surveillance at The Edge
Chen, N., Chen, Y., Blasch, E., Ling, H., You, Y., & Ye, X. (2017) · IEEE International Conference on Smart Cloud (SmartCloud) · doi:10.1109/smartcloud.2017.24 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Self-citationHerrera-Quintero, L. F., Vega-Alfonso, J., Banse, K. B. A., et al. (2018) · IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine · doi:10.1109/mits.2018.2806620 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Implementation of IoT system using block chain with authentication and data protection
Lee, C. H., & Kim, K. (2018) · International Conference on Information Networking · doi:10.1109/icoin.2018.8343261 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Intelligent Surveillance as an Edge Network Service: from Harr-Cascade, SVM to a Lightweight CNN
Nikouei, S. Y., Chen, Y., Song, S., et al. (2018) · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Blockchain for Edge of Things: Applications, Opportunities, and Challenges
Gadekallu, T. R., Pham, Q.-V., Nguyen, D. C., Maddikunta, P. K. R., Deepa, N., Prabadevi, B., Pathirana, P. N., Zhao, J., & Hwang, W.-J. (2022) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2021.3119639 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
A Survey of Video Surveillance Systems in Smart City
Myagmar-Ochir, Y., & Kim, W. (2023) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics12173567 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
“This blockchain feature enables various secure and reliable operations without having a trusted party in the distributed system [64].”
BackgroundA Lightweight Blockchain-Based Privacy Protection for Smart Surveillance at the Edge
Fitwi, A., Chen, Y., & Zhu, S. (2019) · 2019 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain (Blockchain) · doi:10.1109/blockchain.2019.00080 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Self-citationBlockSIEM: Protecting Smart City Services through a Blockchain-based and Distributed SIEM
Botello, J. V., Mesa, A. P., Rodríguez, F. A., Díaz-López, D., Nespoli, P., & Mármol, F. G. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20164636 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nagothu, D., Xu, R., Nikouei, S. Y., & Chen, Y.
- Affiliations
- Binghamton University (US)
- Venue
- 2018 IEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2018-09
- Pages
- 1-4
- OpenAlex
- W2886467254
- Cited by
- 108
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 11.58
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- IEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2) (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
- Keywords
- intelligent surveillance, microservices, blockchain, Internet of Things, smart cities, video stream analysis, edge devices, decentralized systems, data security, privacy, smart contracts, access control, tamper-proof data, single point of failure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review