Cited by 71Social Robot Interaction and HRIIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningEducational Robotics and Engineering

The positive effects of verbal encouragement in mathematics education using a social robot

Open access
Brown, LaVonda N., Howard, Ayanna M.·2014·2014 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference

Abstract

Studies have shown that the use of verbal encouragement strategies in education is able to maximize learning. This idea is derived from traditional classroom settings where teachers use a multitude of behavioral strategies to maintain the students' level of engagement. Motivated by these educational practices, we discuss the use of a Socially Interactive Robotic Tutor (SIRT) that incorporates a variety of verbal cues into multiple math learning scenarios. In this paper, we present the robotic tutor, the methods used to engage students in the learning scenario, and results from integrating the robotic tutor in the classroom environment. Results derived from 44 students engaging with SIRT during a tablet-based math test show that, when compared to non-interactive methods, verbal cues are able to increase and/or maintain student engagement regardless of student age and math content level.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/isecon.2014.6891009

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Physically embodied robots provide adaptive assistance and verbal interaction similar to virtual or conversational agents, yet they foster greater engagement with the physical environment and encourage more advanced social behaviors during learning, leading to improved learning outcomes.

    “Physically embodied robots provide adaptive assistance and verbal interaction similar to virtual or conversational agents [5, 46, 63, 65], yet they foster greater engagement with the physical environment and encourage more advanced social behaviors during learning [2], leading to improved learning outcomes [47].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. R. Picard. Affective Computation, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1997.
  2. P. Brown and S. Levinson, "Politeness," Cambridge Univ. P., 1998.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, L. N., & Howard, A. M.
Affiliations
Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
2014 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2014-03
Pages
1-5
OpenAlex
W1965002790
Cited by
71
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
5.23
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC) (publishedVersion)
  • SMARTech Repository (Georgia Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1148903, 1208287)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Educational Robotics and Engineering
Keywords
verbal encouragement, social robots, mathematics education, student engagement, tablet-based learning, classroom technology integration, age differences in learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review