Cited by 12Augmented Reality ApplicationsTactile and Sensory InteractionsNeuroscience and Neural Engineering

Transformative reality: Augmented reality for visual prostheses

Lui, Wen Lik Dennis, Browne, Damien, Kleeman, Lindsay, Drummond, Tom, Li, Wai Ho·2011·2011 10th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality

Abstract

Visual prostheses such as retinal implants provide bionic vision that is limited in spatial and intensity resolution. This limitation is a fundamental challenge of bionic vision as it severely truncates salient visual information. We propose to address this challenge by performing real time transformations of visual and non-visual sensor data into symbolic representations that are then rendered as low resolution vision; a concept we call Transformative Reality. For example, a depth camera allows the detection of empty ground in cluttered environments that is then visually rendered as bionic vision to enable indoor navigation. Such symbolic representations are similar to virtual content overlays used in Augmented Reality but are registered to the 3D world via the user's sense of touch. Preliminary user trials, where a head mounted display artificially constrains vision to a 25×25 grid of binary dots, suggest that Transformative Reality provides practical and significant improvements over traditional bionic vision in tasks such as indoor navigation, object localisation and people detection.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/ismar.2011.6092402

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The interpretability of low-resolution vision could be enhanced through information extraction, while reducing the recipient's cognitive load.

    “The interpretability of low-resolution vision could be enhanced through information extraction, while at the same time reducing the recipient’s cognitive load.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lui, W. L. D., Browne, D., Kleeman, L., Drummond, T., & Li, W. H.
Affiliations
Monash University (AU)
Venue
2011 10th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2011-10
Pages
253-254
ISSN
1554-7868 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089337390
Cited by
12
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.95
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings - International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, ISMAR (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Augmented Reality Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
Keywords
retinal prosthesis, bionic vision, augmented reality, symbolic representation, depth camera, indoor navigation, object localization, human detection, head-mounted displays

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review