CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 23Transportation and Mobility InnovationsTransportation Planning and OptimizationSharing Economy and Platforms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A critical analysis of travel demand estimation for new one-way carsharing systems

Open access
Vosooghi, Reza, Puchinger, Jakob, Jankovic, Marija, Sirin, Goknur·2017·2017 IEEE 20th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC)
DOI 10.1109/itsc.2017.8317917
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Technologic advancements have contributed to the spread of sharing economy concepts, a developing phenomenon that favors the shift from private mobility to service-use (shared mobility). One-way carsharing is a most recent and popular kind of shared mobility, that is growing and developing rapidly in various forms. These systems are considered to have a transformative impact on future urban transportation. Despite all of the benefits that have been reported from the use of new one-way carsharing (e.g. Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand systems), their impacts on the mobility are not certain yet. This comes from the fact that in such services supply and demand influence each other in a significant way in short-, mid-, and long-term. Also service characteristics at the level of each vehicle strongly affect the demand. In this paper methods, paradigms, toolkits and platforms used in the literature for the demand estimation of the new one-way carsharing systems, as well as their potential drawbacks are discussed. A review of the literature reveals that despite the considerable number of studies related to balancing vehicle stocks across stations in one-way systems, the investigation about demand estimation of such services for which the complex relationship between supply and demand is considered, remain very limited. The majority of current platforms and toolkits used for demand estimation of new one-way carsharing systems are based on activity-based multi-agent simulations. In these…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/itsc.2017.8317917

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. 10.1016/j.tbs.2017.02.002 · DOI
  2. zmud, 2016, Consumer acceptance and travel behavior impacts of automated vehicles final report consumer acceptance and travel behavior impacts of automated vehicles
  3. 10.1016/j.trc.2016.06.015 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.3141/2110-03 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.trc.2015.03.008 · DOI
  6. 0, SimMobility - Integrated Simulation Platform | Intelligent transportation systems lab
  7. 10.1016/j.trc.2017.01.010 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/j.tra.2016.08.020 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/j.trc.2016.01.019 · DOI · Paper page
  10. lavieri, 2016, Modeling individual preferences for ownership and sharing of autonomous vehicle technologies, 96 th Annu Meet Transp Res Board Submitt Present Publ
  11. shaheen, 2013, Innovative mobility carsharing outlook 2013
  12. martínez, 2015, Insights into carsharing demand dynamics: outputs of an agent-based model application to Lisbon, Portugal, Transportation Res Board Annu Meet, 272, 1
  13. shaheen, 2016, Innovative mobility carsharing outlook worldwide carsharing growth continues
  14. 2014, Car share fact sheet
  15. brandstätter, 2016, Overview of optimization problems in electric car-sharing system design and management, 441
  16. 10.3141/1791-16 · DOI
  17. de, 2011, Modelling Transport
  18. kortum, 2012, Free-floating Carsharing Systems Innovations in Membership Prediction Mode Share and Vehicle Allocation Optimization Methodologies
  19. zheng, 2013, A primer for agent-based simulation and modeling in transportation applications
  20. jorge, 2013, Carsharing systems demand estimation and defined operations: a literature review, Eur J Transp Infrastruct Res, 13, 201
  21. catalano, 2008, Car sharing demand estimation and urban transport demand modelling using stated preference techniques, Eur Transp Trasp Eur, 40, 33
  22. horl, 2016, Simulation of autonomous taxis in a multimodal traffic scenario with dynamic demand, Arbeitsberichte Verkehrs- und Raumplan, 1184
  23. litman, 2014, Autonomous vehicle implementation predictions implications for transport planning, Transp Res Board Annu Meet, 42, 36
  24. heilig, 2015, Multiple-day agent-based modelling approach of station-based and free-floating car-sharing, Transportation Res Board Annu Meet
  25. shaheen, 2016, Shared mobility: current practices and guiding principles, Washington D C
  26. shaheen, 2014, Autonomous carsharing / taxi pathways, UC Berkeley
  27. 10.3141/2564-03 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.003 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1007/s11116-015-9607-0 · DOI
  30. 10.3141/2536-12 · DOI · Paper page
  31. ferrero, 2015, Car-sharing services - part A taxonomy and annotated review, CIRRELT, 2015
  32. shaheen, 2013, Carsharing and personal vehicle services: worldwide market developments and emerging trends, Int J Sustain Transp, 7, 5, 10.1080/15568318.2012.660103 · DOI
  33. shaheen, 1998, Carsharing in Europe and North America: past, present, and future, Transp Q, 52, 35
  34. adnan, 2016, SimMobility: a multiscale integrated agent-based simulation platform, Transportation Res Board Annu Meet
  35. kouwenhoven, 2011, Estimating potential demand for Autolib - a new transport system for Paris, International Choice Modelling Conference 2011
  36. 0, MATSim | Multi-Agent Transport Simulation
  37. mallig, 0, Modeling travel demand over a period of one week the mobitopp model
  38. ciari, 2012, Modeling one-way shared vehicle systems: an agent-based approach, Proc 13th Int Conf Travel Behaviour Res, 1
  39. balmer, 2007, Travel demand modeling for multi-agent transport simulations algorithms and systems
  40. 10.3141/2536-02 · DOI
  41. 10.3141/1985-14 · DOI
  42. 10.3141/2416-05 · DOI
  43. fagnant, 2016, Dynamic ride-sharing and fleet sizing for a system of shared autonomous vehicles in Austin, Texas, Transportation (Amst), 1
  44. 0, Aimsun traffic modelling software | TSS-Transport Simulation Systems
  45. 0, MobiTopp
  46. 10.1080/15568318.2016.1226997 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 23

Metadata

Authors
Vosooghi, R., Puchinger, J., Jankovic, M., & Sirin, G.
Affiliations
Université Paris-Saclay (FR)
ORCID
Venue
2017 IEEE 20th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2017-10
Pages
199-205
DOI
10.1109/itsc.2017.8317917
OpenAlex
W2766982594
Cited by
23
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7
FWCI
3.34
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Sharing Economy and Platforms
Keywords
one-way carsharing, travel demand estimation, shared mobility, supply and demand, multi-agent simulation, autonomous mobility-on-demand, data quality, urban transport

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review