Cited by 12Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesMaternal and fetal healthcareArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Automatic ultrasound assessment of placenta previa during the third trimester for rural areas

Saavedra, Ana Cecilia, Arroyo, Junior, Tamayo, Lorena, Egoavil, Miguel, Ramos, Berta, Castaneda, Benjamin·2020·2020 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS)

Abstract

Placenta previa describes the abnormal implantation of the placenta in the uterus of pregnant women, entirely or partially obstructing the internal cervical os. For clinical significance, it is suggested to assess the final placental location in the third trimester. In rural areas of developing countries, the absence of radiologists and sophisticated ultrasound systems make difficult the diagnosis of this condition. Ten pregnant women in their third trimester (age range of 22-43 years) were enrolled in this study. A volume sweep imaging obstetric protocol based on eight free-hand sweeping (three transverse and five longitudinal throughout the maternal abdominal area) was used. The acquisition was performed using a portable ultrasound scanner by a non-specialist. The dataset consisted of eight videos per volunteer and one hundred frames per video on average. Placental segmentation was carried out using the U-Net deep learning architecture and the leave one out cross-validation approach. The output masks combined with the knowledge of the acquisition protocol allowed to assess the spatial location likelihood of the placenta in the uterus, which is represented by a heat map. The method showed a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 92 %. Albeit the need for further validation, this approach may automatically warn of possible risks in childbirth, giving the chance to notify the specialist.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/ius46767.2020.9251764

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saavedra, A. C., Arroyo, J., Tamayo, L., Egoavil, M., Ramos, B., & Castaneda, B.
Affiliations
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú (PE)
Venue
2020 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-09-07
Pages
1-4
ISSN
1948-5719 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3100085565
Cited by
12
References
15
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7
FWCI
0.62
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
placenta previa, third trimester, portable ultrasound, rural health care, U-Net, prenatal ultrasound, resource-limited settings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review