Cited by 30Machine Learning in HealthcareEmergency and Acute Care StudiesArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Hospital Admission Location Prediction via Deep Interpretable Networks for the Year-Round Improvement of Emergency Patient Care

Open access
El-Bouri, Rasheed, Eyre, David W., Watkinson, Peter, Zhu, Tingting, Clifton, David A.·2021·IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This paper presents a deep learning method of predicting where in a hospital emergency patients will be admitted after being triaged in the Emergency Department (ED). Such a prediction will allow for the preparation of bed space in the hospital for timely care and admission of the patient as well as allocation of resource to the relevant departments, including during periods of increased demand arising from seasonal peaks in infections. METHODS: The problem is posed as a multi-class classification into seven separate ward types. A novel deep learning training strategy was created that combines learning via curriculum and a multi-armed bandit to exploit this curriculum post-initial training. RESULTS: We successfully predict the initial hospital admission location with area-under-receiver-operating-curve (AUROC) ranging between 0.60 to 0.78 for the individual wards and an overall maximum accuracy of 52% where chance corresponds to 14% for this seven-class setting. Our proposed network was able to interpret which features drove the predictions using a 'network saliency' term added to the network loss function. CONCLUSION: We have proven that prediction of location of admission in hospital for emergency patients is possible using information from triage in ED. We have also shown that there are certain tell-tale tests which indicate what space of the hospital a patient will use. SIGNIFICANCE: It is hoped that this predictor will be of value to healthcare institutions by allowing for the planning of resource and bed space ahead of the need for it. This in turn should speed up the provision of care for the patient and allow flow of patients out of the ED thereby improving patient flow and the quality of care for the remaining patients within the ED.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jbhi.2020.2990309

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Y. Bengio, J. Louradour, R. Collobert, and J. Weston, "Curriculum learn- ing," in Proc. 26th Annu. Int. Conf. Mach. Learn, 2009, pp. 41-48.
  2. R. Francis, Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust public Inquiry: Executive Summary. vol. 947. The Stationery Office, 2013.
  3. P. Auer, N. Cesa-Bianchi, Y. Freund, and R. E. Schapire, "The nonstochas- tic multiarmed bandit problem," SIAM J. Comput., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 48-77, 2002.
  4. R. De Maesschalck, D. Jouan-Rimbaud, and D. L. Massart, "The maha- lanobis distance," Chemometrics Intell. Lab. Syst., vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 1-18, 2000.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
El-Bouri, R., Eyre, D. W., Watkinson, P., Zhu, T., & Clifton, D. A.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
Published
2021-01
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
289-300
ISSN
  • 2168-2194 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-2208
OpenAlex
W3028279553
Cited by
30
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • EPSRC Doctoral Training
  • U.K.'s high-priority
  • National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
  • Royal Academy of Engineering Research Fellowship
  • Big Data Institute Robertson Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
emergency department triage, multi-class classification, curriculum learning, multi-armed bandits, explainable deep learning, patient flow, healthcare resource allocation
MeSH terms
Emergency Service, Hospital, Hospitalization, Hospitals, Humans, Triage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review