Cited by 576Machine Learning in HealthcareMedical Coding and Health InformationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Dipole: Diagnosis Prediction in Healthcare via Attention-based Bidirectional Recurrent Neural Networks

Open access
Ma, Fenglong, Chitta, Radha, Zhou, Jing, You, Quanzeng, Sun, Tong, Gao, Jing·2017·Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining

Abstract

Predicting the future health information of patients from the historical Electronic Health Records (EHR) is a core research task in the development of personalized healthcare. Patient EHR data consist of sequences of visits over time, where each visit contains multiple medical codes, including diagnosis, medication, and procedure codes. The most important challenges for this task are to model the temporality and high dimensionality of sequential EHR data and to interpret the prediction results. Existing work solves this problem by employing recurrent neural networks (RNNs) to model EHR data and utilizing simple attention mechanism to interpret the results. However, RNN-based approaches suffer from the problem that the performance of RNNs drops when the length of sequences is large, and the relationships between subsequent visits are ignored by current RNN-based approaches. To address these issues, we propose Dipole, an end-to-end, simple and robust model for predicting patients' future health information. Dipole employs bidirectional recurrent neural networks to remember all the information of both the past visits and the future visits, and it introduces three attention mechanisms to measure the relationships of different visits for the prediction. With the attention mechanisms, Dipole can interpret the prediction results effectively. Dipole also allows us to interpret the learned medical code representations which are confirmed positively by medical experts. Experimental results on two real world EHR datasets show that the proposed Dipole can significantly improve the prediction accuracy compared with the state-of-the-art diagnosis prediction approaches and provide clinically meaningful interpretation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3097983.3098088

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. [1][1] Jimmy Ba, Volodymyr Mnih, and Koray Kavukcuoglu. 2015. Multiple Object Recognition with Visual Attention. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR'15) . -
  2. [2][2] Dzmitry Bahdanau, Kyunghyun Cho, and Yoshua Bengio. 2015. Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translate. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR'15) . -
  3. [7][7] Yu Cheng, Fei Wang, Ping Zhang, and Jianying Hu. 2016. Risk Prediction with Electronic Health Records: A Deep Learning Approach. In Proceedings of the 2016 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (SDM'16) . 432-440. -
  4. [9][9] Edward Choi, Mohammad Taha Bahadori, Elizabeth Searles, Catherine Coffey, Michael Thompson, James Bost, Javier Tejedor-Sojo, and Jimeng Sun. 2016. 10. Multi-layer Representation Learning for Medical Concepts. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD'16) . 1495-1504. -
  5. [11][11] Edward Choi, Mohammad Taha Bahadori, Jimeng Sun, Joshua Kulas, Andy Schuetz, and Walter Stewart. 2016. RETAIN: An Interpretable Predictive Model for Healthcare using Reverse Time Attention Mechanism. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS'16) . 3504-3512. -
  6. [13][13] Jan K Chorowski, Dzmitry Bahdanau, Dmitriy Serdyuk, Kyunghyun Cho, and Yoshua Bengio. 2015. Attention-based Models for Speech Recognition. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS'15) . 577-585. -
  7. [14][14] Karl Moritz Hermann, Tomas Kocisky, Edward Grefenstette, Lasse Espeholt, Will Kay, Mustafa Suleyman, and Phil Blunsom. 2015. Teaching Machines to Read and Comprehend. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS'15) . 1693-1701. -
  8. [17][17] Alex M Lamb, Anirudh Goyal ALIAS PARTH GOYAL, Ying Zhang, Saizheng Zhang, Aaron C Courville, and Yoshua Bengio. 2016. Professor Forcing: A New Algorithm for Training Recurrent Networks. In Advances In Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS'16) . 4601-4609. -
  9. [18][18] Zachary C Lipton, David C Kale, and Randall Wetzel. 2016. Modeling Missing Data in Clinical Time Series with RNNs. In Proceedings of Machine Learning for Healthcare (MLHC'16) . -
  10. [21][21] Fenglong Ma, Chuishi Meng, Houping Xiao, Qi Li, Jing Gao, Lu Su, and Aidong Zhang. 2017. Unsupervised Discovery of Drug Side-Effects from Heterogeneous Data Sources. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD'17) . ACM. -
  11. [22][22] Tomas Mikolov, Ilya Sutskever, Kai Chen, Greg S Corrado, and Jeff Dean. 2013. Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and Their Compositionality. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS'13) . 3111-3119. -
  12. [23][23] Phuoc Nguyen, Truyen Tran, Nilmini Wickramasinghe, and Svetha Venkatesh. 2016. Deepr: A Convolutional Net for Medical Records. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics (2016). -
  13. [25][25] Qiuling Suo, Fenglong Ma, Giovanni Canino, Jing Gao, Aidong Zhang, Pierangelo Veltri, and Agostino Gnasso. 2017. A Multi-task Framework for Monitoring Health Conditions via Attention-based Recurrent Neural Networks. In Proceedings of the AMIA 2017 Annual Symposium (AMIA'17) . -
  14. [26][26] Xiang Wang, David Sontag, and Fei Wang. 2014. Unsupervised Learning of Disease Progression Models. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD'14) . ACM, 85-94. -
  15. [27][27] Houping Xiao, Jing Gao, Long Vu, and Deepak S. Turaga. 2017. Learning Temporal State of Diabetes Patients via Combining Behavioral and Demographic Data. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD'17) . ACM. -
  16. [28][28] Kelvin Xu, Jimmy Ba, Ryan Kiros, Kyunghyun Cho, Aaron Courville, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, Richard S Zemel, and Yoshua Bengio. 2015. Show, Attend and Tell: Neural Image Caption Generation with Visual Attention. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML'15) . CoRR, 20482057. -
  17. [31][31] Jiayu Zhou, Jimeng Sun, Yashu Liu, Jianying Hu, and Jieping Ye. 2013. Patient Risk Prediction Model via Top-k Stability Selection. In Proceedings of the 13th SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (SDM'13) . SIAM, 55-63. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ma, F., Chitta, R., Zhou, J., You, Q., Sun, T., & Gao, J.
Affiliations
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
  • Conduent Labs US, Rochester, NY, USA
  • University of Rochester (US)
  • United Technologies Research Center & Xerox, East Hartford, CT, USA
Venue
Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining
Publisher
ACM
Published
2017-08-13
Pages
1903-1911
OpenAlex
W2690721124
Cited by
576
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 99 · 2020: 77 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 6
FWCI
22.83
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation (IIS-1514204)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
electronic health records, diagnostic prediction, bidirectional recurrent neural network, attention mechanism, temporal modeling, interpretability, personalized healthcare

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review