The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deep Sentiment Classification and Topic Discovery on Novel Coronavirus or COVID-19 Online Discussions: NLP Using LSTM Recurrent Neural Network Approach
Open accessAbstract
Internet forums and public social media, such as online healthcare forums, provide a convenient channel for users (people/patients) concerned about health issues to discuss and share information with each other. In late December 2019, an outbreak of a novel coronavirus (infection from which results in the disease named COVID-19) was reported, and, due to the rapid spread of the virus in other parts of the world, the World Health Organization declared a state of emergency. In this paper, we used automated extraction of COVID-19-related discussions from social media and a natural language process (NLP) method based on topic modeling to uncover various issues related to COVID-19 from public opinions. Moreover, we also investigate how to use LSTM recurrent neural network for sentiment classification of COVID-19 comments. Our findings shed light on the importance of using public opinions and suitable computational techniques to understand issues surrounding COVID-19 and to guide related decision-making. In addition, experiments demonstrated that the research model achieved an accuracy of 81.15% - a higher accuracy than that of several other well-known machine-learning algorithms for COVID-19-Sentiment Classification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Convolutional, Long Short-Term Memory, fully connected Deep Neural Networks
Sainath, T. N., Vinyals, O., Senior, A., & Sak, H. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) · doi:10.1109/icassp.2015.7178838 · Cited by 1,678
Sentiment strength detection in short informal text
Thelwall, M., Buckley, K., Paltoglou, G., Cai, D., & Kappas, A. (2010) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21416 · Cited by 1,449
Cited by
What social media told us in the time of COVID-19: A scoping review
Tsao, S.-F., Chen, H., Tisseverasinghe, T., Yang, Y., Li, L., & Butt, Z. A. (2021) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(20)30315-0 · Cited by 816
Babu, N. V., & Kanaga, E. G. M. (2022) · SN Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s42979-021-00958-1 · Cited by 303
Federated learning for secure IoMT-applications in smart healthcare systems: A comprehensive review
Rani, S., Kataria, A., Kumar, S., & Tiwari, P. (2023) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2023.110658 · Cited by 228
Applications of artificial intelligence in battling against covid-19: A literature review
Tayarani N., M.-H. (2021) · Chaos, Solitons & Fractals · doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110338 · Cited by 210
COVID-19 Tweets Classification Based on a Hybrid Word Embedding Method
Didi, Y., Walha, A., & Wali, A. (2022) · Big Data and Cognitive Computing · doi:10.3390/bdcc6020058 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Jelodar, H., Wang, Y., Orji, R., & Huang, S.
- Venue
- IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
- Published
- 2020-10
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2733-2742
- ISSN
- 2168-2194 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-2208
- OpenAlex
- W3035119815
- Cited by
- 400
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 28.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep Sentiment Classification and Topic Discovery on Novel Coronavirus or COVID-19 Online Discussions: NLP Using LSTM Recurrent Neural Network Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jbhi.2020.3001216
- The paper
- Jelodar, H., Wang, Y., Orji, R., & Huang, S. (2020). Deep Sentiment Classification and Topic Discovery on Novel Coronavirus or COVID-19 Online Discussions: NLP Using LSTM Recurrent Neural Network Approach. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1109/jbhi.2020.3001216
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.