Cited by 224Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingInternet of Things and AI

Federated-learning based privacy preservation and fraud-enabled blockchain IoMT system for healthcare

Open access
Lakhan, Abdullah, Mohammed, Mazin Abed, Nedoma, Jan, Martinek, Radek, Tiwari, Prayag, Vidyarthi, Ankit, Alkhayyat, Ahmed, Wang, Weiyu·2023·IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics

Abstract

These days, the usage of machine-learning-enabled dynamic Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) systems with multiple technologies for digital healthcare applications has been growing progressively in practice. Machine learning plays a vital role in the IoMT system to balance the load between delay and energy. However, the traditional learning models fraud on the data in the distributed IoMT system for healthcare applications are still a critical research problem in practice. The study devises a federated learning-based blockchain-enabled task scheduling (FL-BETS) framework with different dynamic heuristics. The study considers the different healthcare applications that have both hard constraint (e.g., deadline) and resource energy consumption (e.g., soft constraint) during execution on the distributed fog and cloud nodes. The goal of FL-BETS is to identify and ensure the privacy preservation and fraud of data at various levels, such as local fog nodes and remote clouds, with minimum energy consumption and delay, and to satisfy the deadlines of healthcare workloads. The study introduces the mathematical model. In the performance evaluation, FL-BETS outperforms all existing machine learning and blockchain mechanisms in fraud analysis, data validation, energy and delay constraints for healthcare applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jbhi.2022.3165945

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lakhan, A., Mohammed, M. A., Nedoma, J., Martinek, R., Tiwari, P., Vidyarthi, A., Alkhayyat, A., & Wang, W.
Affiliations
  • Wenzhou University (CN)
  • University of Anbar (IQ)
  • VSB - Technical University of Ostrava (CZ)
  • Aalto University (FI)
  • Jaypee Institute of Information Technology (IN)
  • Islamic University of Najaf (IQ)
  • Changzhou University (CN)
Venue
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
Published
2023-02
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
664-672
ISSN
  • 2168-2194 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-2208
OpenAlex
W4223622367
Cited by
224
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 19
FWCI
47.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Aaltodoc (Aalto University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DSpace VŠB-TUO (VŠB-TUO) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Education of Czech Republic (SP2022/18, SP2022/34)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
Keywords
federated learning, blockchain, Internet of Medical Things, healthcare data privacy, task scheduling, fog computing, cloud computing, energy consumption, deadline constraints, privacy preservation
MeSH terms
Internet of Things, Blockchain, Computer Communication Networks, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Privacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review