Cited by 80Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataBlockchain Technology Applications and SecurityInternet of Things and AI

Federated learning-based secure electronic health record sharing scheme in medical informatics

Salim, Mikail Mohammed, Park, Jong Hyuk·2023·IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics

Abstract

Medical Cyber-Physical Systems support the mobility of electronic health records data for clinical research to accelerate new scientific discoveries. Artificial Intelligence improves medical informatics, but current centralized data training and insecure data storage management techniques expose private medical data to unauthorized foreign entities. In this paper, a Federated Learning-based Electronic Health Record sharing scheme is proposed for Medical Informatics to preserve patient data privacy. A decentralized Federated Learning-based Convolutional Neural Network model trains data locally in the hospital and stores results in a private InterPlanetary File System. A secondary global model is trained at the research center using the local models. Private IPFS secures all medical data stored locally in the hospital. The novelty of this study resides in securing valuable hospital biomedical data useful for clinical research organizations. Blockchain and smart contracts enable patients to negotiate with external entities for rewards in exchange for their data. Evaluation results demonstrate that the decentralized CNN model performs better in accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, similar to the traditional centralized model. The performance of the Private IPFS exceeds the Blockchain-based IPFS based on file upload and download time. The scheme is suitable for promoting a secure and privacy-friendly environment for sharing data with clinical research centers for biomedical research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jbhi.2022.3174823

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Salim and Park presented a secure EHR scheme in a hospital using federated learning and blockchain, where IPFS stores private data, EHR hashed addresses are recorded on a Consortium Blockchain, access is granted by patients via smart contracts, and EHR data are trained locally and globally.

    “Salim and Park [44] presented a secure EHR scheme in a hospital that adopted FL and blockchain technology. In the scheme, Inter Planetary File System (IPFS) stores private data. In the IPFS, all EHR hashed addresses are recorded using a Consortium Blockchain-based network. Access to the EHR is granted by individual patients enabled by smart contracts. EHR data are trained both locally and globally”
  • All four FL-chain systems [42,43,44,45] from this review adopted additional privacy enhancement methods to improve privacy protection.

    “All of the four FL-chain systems [42,43,44,45] from this review adopted additional privacy enhancement methods to improve privacy protection.”
  • The consensus process in the FL-chain systems [42,43,44,45] requires significant computational resources.

    “Besides the integration of the additional privacy enhancement methods, the consensus process in the FL-chain systems [42,43,44,45] requires significant computational resources.”
  • Four FL-chain healthcare applications in this review demonstrate that blockchain technology is relevant to FL.

    “Four FL-chain healthcare applications [42,43,44,45] in this review prove that the blockchain technology is relevant to FL.”
  • The existing work in this review presented approaches including adding gradient [42], extra elements [43], hashed EHR address [44], and additional rules [45].

    “The existing work in this review presented the approaches including adding gradient [42], extra elements [43], hashed EHR address [44], and additional rules [45].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salim, M. M., & Park, J. H.
Affiliations
Seoul National University of Science and Technology (KR)
Venue
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
Published
2023-02
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
617-624
ISSN
  • 2168-2194 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-2208
OpenAlex
W4280564713
Cited by
80
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 2
FWCI
4.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Defense Acquisition Program Administration and Agency for Defense Development (UD210029TD)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
Keywords
federated learning, electronic health records, data privacy, health data sharing, IPFS, blockchain, smart contracts, convolutional neural networks, decentralized machine learning, clinical research data, medical cyber-physical systems, patient data protection
MeSH terms
Blockchain, Artificial Intelligence, Confidentiality, Humans, Medical Informatics, Privacy, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review