Cited by 104Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionInternet of Things and AI

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dew-Cloud-Based Hierarchical Federated Learning for Intrusion Detection in IoMT

Open access
Singh, Parminder, Gaba, Gurjot Singh, Kaur, Avinash, Hedabou, Mustapha, Gurtov, Andrei·2023·IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics

Abstract

The coronavirus pandemic has overburdened medical institutions, forcing physicians to diagnose and treat their patients remotely. Moreover, COVID-19 has made humans more conscious about their health, resulting in the extensive purchase of IoT-enabled medical devices. The rapid boom in the market worth of the internet of medical things (IoMT) captured cyber attackers' attention. Like health, medical data is also sensitive and worth a lot on the dark web. Despite the fact that the patient's health details have not been protected appropriately, letting the trespassers exploit them. The system administrator is unable to fortify security measures due to the limited storage capacity and computation power of the resource-constrained network devices'. Although various supervised and unsupervised machine learning algorithms have been developed to identify anomalies, the primary undertaking is to explore the swift progressing malicious attacks before they deteriorate the wellness system's integrity. In this paper, a Dew-Cloud based model is designed to enable hierarchical federated learning (HFL). The proposed Dew-Cloud model provides a higher level of data privacy with greater availability of IoMT critical application(s). The hierarchical long-term memory (HLSTM) model is deployed at distributed Dew servers with a backend supported by cloud computing. Data pre-processing feature helps the proposed model achieve high training accuracy (99.31%) with minimum training loss (0.034). The experiment results demonstrate that the proposed HFL-HLSTM model is superior to existing schemes in terms of performance metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, and f-score.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jbhi.2022.3186250

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Schneble, 2019, Attack detection using federated learning in medical cyber-physical systems, 29, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 104

Metadata

Authors
Singh, P., Gaba, G. S., Kaur, A., Hedabou, M., & Gurtov, A.
Affiliations
  • Lovely Professional University (IN)
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • Université Mohammed VI Polytechnique (MA)
Venue
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
Published
2023-02
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
722-731
ISSN
  • 2168-2194 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-2208
OpenAlex
W4285030518
Cited by
103
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 15
FWCI
6.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DiVA (Linkoping University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • CENIIT (17.01)
  • Excellence Center at Linköping-Lund in IT
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
Keywords
hierarchical federated learning, intrusion detection, Internet of Medical Things, medical device security, data privacy, long short-term memory, cloud computing, resource-constrained devices, medical data protection
MeSH terms
Cloud Computing, Internet of Things, COVID-19, Algorithms, Humans, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review