Cited by 236IoT and Edge/Fog ComputingInternet of Things and AIInformation and Cyber Security

Security vulnerabilities, attacks, countermeasures, and regulations of networked medical devices – a review

Yaqoob, Tahreem, Abbas, Haider, Atiquzzaman, Mohammed·2019·IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials

Abstract

Over the last few years, healthcare administrations have been digitizing their provision of care that led to an increased number of networked medical devices and medical telemetry. Due to such digitization, medical devices have made phenomenal strides in the course of the last half-century. These networked medical devices have enhanced the quality and accessibility of health treatments by achieving pervasive healthcare vision. Moreover, these devices have transformed the canvas of medical treatments and improved the lives of the masses. Such innovation, as a result, assisted in paving the way for reliable healthcare facilities through the introduction of new areas of therapeutic and diagnostic treatments. Medical devices, nowadays, are portable, networked, and capable enough to facilitate human lives. The refined quality and variety of these devices put forward a promising future. However, on the other hand, the healthcare sector is experiencing the greatest amount of security breaches due to the presence of security flaws in medical devices. As these devices are no longer standalone systems and are network-connected, the attack surface has increased profoundly. Actually, devices in practice were designed, developed, and disseminated long ago. Therefore, they were not developed from the ground up with security as a vital design constraint. The flaws present in these devices have acquired the consideration of researchers from both industry and academia. In this paper, we studi…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/comst.2019.2914094

Cites

115 of 115 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yaqoob, T., Abbas, H., & Atiquzzaman, M.
Affiliations
  • National University of Sciences and Technology (PK)
  • University of Oklahoma (US)
Venue
IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials
Published
2019
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
3723-3768
ISSN
  • 1553-877X (ISSN-L)
  • 2373-745X
OpenAlex
W2943017035
Cited by
236
References
115
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 2
FWCI
12.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials (publishedVersion)
Funders
Higher Education Commission, Pakistan (2(1078)/HEC/M&E/2018/707)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
Keywords
networked medical devices, medical device security, security vulnerabilities, security countermeasures, healthcare cybersecurity, biotelemetry, security regulations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review