The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Context-Aware Computing, Learning, and Big Data in Internet of Things: A Survey
Abstract
Internet of Things (IoT) has been growing rapidly due to recent advancements in communications and sensor technologies. Meanwhile, with this revolutionary transformation, researchers, implementers, deployers, and users are faced with many challenges. IoT is a complicated, crowded, and complex field; there are various types of devices, protocols, communication channels, architectures, middleware, and more. Standardization efforts are plenty, and this chaos will continue for quite some time. What is clear, on the other hand, is that IoT deployments are increasing with accelerating speed, and this trend will not stop in the near future. As the field grows in numbers and heterogeneity, “intelligence” becomes a focal point in IoT. Since data now becomes “big data,” understanding, learning, and reasoning with big data is paramount for the future success of IoT. One of the major problems in the path to intelligent IoT is understanding “context,” or making sense of the environment, situation, or status using data from sensors, and then acting accordingly in autonomous ways. This is called “context-aware computing,” and it now requires both sensing and, increasingly, learning, as IoT systems get more data and better learning from this big data. In this survey, we review the field, first, from a historical perspective, covering ubiquitous and pervasive computing, ambient intelligence, and wireless sensor networks, and then, move to context-aware computing studies. Finally, we review learning and big data studies related to IoT. We also identify the open issues and provide an insight for future study areas for IoT researchers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction
Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/tnn.1998.712192 · Cited by 27,225
Case-Based Reasoning: Foundational Issues, Methodological Variations, and System Approaches
Aamodt, A., & Plaza, E. (1994) · AI Communications · doi:10.3233/aic-1994-7104 · Cited by 5,624
Internet of Things in industries: A survey
Xu, L. D., He, W., & Li, S. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2014.2300753 · Cited by 5,172
(2007) · doi:10.1145/1294261.1294281 · Cited by 3,447
Chen, M., Mao, S., & Liu, Y. (2014) · Mobile Networks and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11036-013-0489-0 · Cited by 2,913
Context Aware Computing for The Internet of Things: A Survey
Perera, C., Zaslavsky, A., Christen, P., & Georgakopoulos, D. (2014) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/surv.2013.042313.00197 · Cited by 2,861 · cited 10×
“The most popular classification of context modeling is defined as key-value, markup scheme, graphical, object oriented, logic-based, ontology-based, spatial, uncertainty, and hybrid context modeling [21], [23], [26], [98], [99].”
BackgroundInfluentialData Mining for Internet of Things: A Survey
Tsai, C.-W., Lai, C.-F., Chiang, M.-C., & Yang, L. T. (2014) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/surv.2013.103013.00206 · Cited by 620 · cited 2×
“5) Survey of data mining [27], [31], [32].”
BackgroundTapia, E. M., Intille, S. S., Haskell, W., Larson, K., Wright, J., King, A., & Friedman, R. (2007) · 2007 11th IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers · doi:10.1109/iswc.2007.4373774 · Cited by 458
Feature Learning for Activity Recognition in Ubiquitous Computing
Plötz, T., Hammerla, N., & Olivier, P. (2011) · Newcastle University · doi:10.25405/ncl.34175319 · Cited by 337
Cited by
Digital twin: Enabling technologies, challenges and open research
Fuller, A., Fan, Z., Day, C., & Barlow, C. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2998358 · Cited by 2,965
A Survey of Machine and Deep Learning Methods for Internet of Things (IoT) Security
Al-Garadi, M. A., Mohamed, A., Al-Ali, A. K., Du, X., Ali, I., & Guizani, M. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2020.2988293 · Cited by 1,392
Application of Machine Learning in Wireless Networks: Key Techniques and Open Issues
Sun, Y., Peng, M., Zhou, Y., Huang, Y., & Mao, S. (2019) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2019.2924243 · Cited by 678
Internet of Ships: A Survey on Architectures, Emerging Applications, and Challenges
Aslam, S., Michaelides, M. P., & Herodotou, H. (2020) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2020.2993411 · Cited by 261
FDC: A Secure Federated Deep Learning Mechanism for Data Collaborations in the Internet of Things
Yin, B., Yin, H., Wu, Y., & Jiang, Z. (2020) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2020.2966778 · Cited by 149
Metadata
- Authors
- Sezer, O. B., Dogdu, E., & Ozbayoglu, A. M.
- Venue
- IEEE Internet of Things Journal
- Published
- 2018-02
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-27
- ISSN
- 2327-4662 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2770587725
- Cited by
- 453
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 20.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Context-Aware Computing, Learning, and Big Data in Internet of Things: A Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jiot.2017.2773600
- The paper
- Sezer, O. B., Dogdu, E., & Ozbayoglu, A. M. (2018). Context-Aware Computing, Learning, and Big Data in Internet of Things: A Survey. IEEE Internet of Things Journal. https://doi.org/10.1109/jiot.2017.2773600
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.