Cited by 149Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataBlockchain Technology Applications and SecurityIoT and Edge/Fog Computing

FDC: A Secure Federated Deep Learning Mechanism for Data Collaborations in the Internet of Things

Yin, Bo, Yin, Hao, Wu, Yulei, Jiang, Zexun·2020·IEEE Internet of Things Journal

Abstract

With the explosive network data due to the advanced development of the Internet of Things (IoT), the demand for multiparty computation is increasing. In addition, with the advent of future digital society, data have been gradually evolving into an effective virtual asset for sharing and usage. With the nature of the sensitivity, massiveness, fragmentation, and security of multiparty data computation in the IoT environment, we propose a secure data collaboration framework (FDC) based on federated deep-learning technology. The proposed framework can realize the secure collaboration of multiparty data computation on the premise that the data do not need to be transmitted out of their private data center. This framework is empowered by public data center, private data center, and the blockchain technology. The private data center is responsible for data governance, data registration, and data management. The public data center is used for multiparty secure computation. The blockchain paradigm is responsible for ensuring secure data usage and transmissions. A real IoT scenario is used to validate the effectiveness of the proposed framework.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jiot.2020.2966778

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The proposed scheme in [57] lacks security protection design for cloud-based learning.

    “A drawback of this proposed scheme is the lack of security protection design for cloud-based learning in the FL process.”
  • Simulations with human movement datasets confirm high performance in training accuracy and high-security degrees for a wearable sensor network in the FLchain framework of [69].

    “Simulations with human movement datasets confirm high performance in training accuracy and high-security degrees for a wearable sensor network.”
  • An FLchain framework is studied in [69] to achieve secure IoT data collaboration among IoT users.

    “To achieve a secure IoT data collaboration among IoT users, an FLchain framework is also studied in [69] among private data center, a public data center, and a blockchain network.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yin, B., Yin, H., Wu, Y., & Jiang, Z.
Affiliations
  • Beijing Information Science & Technology University (CN)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
Venue
IEEE Internet of Things Journal
Published
2020-07
Volume
7
Issue
7
Pages
6348-6359
ISSN
  • 2327-4662 (ISSN-L)
  • 2372-2541
OpenAlex
W2999469653
Cited by
149
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 13
FWCI
10.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Internet of Things Journal (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Basic Research Program of China (2016YFB1000102)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61972222, 61672318)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Keywords
federated deep learning, secure multi-party computation, Internet of Things, data collaboration, blockchain, data governance, data sharing, privacy-preserving computation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review