Cited by 29Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataCryptography and Data SecurityInternet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting

Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning with Resource Adaptive Compression for Edge Devices

Hidayat, Muhammad Ayat, Nakamura, Yugo, Arakawa, Yutaka·2024·IEEE Internet of Things Journal

Abstract

Federated learning (FL) has gained widespread attention as a distributed machine learning (ML) technique that offers data protection when training on local devices. Unlike conventional centralized training in traditional ML, FL incorporates privacy and security measures as it does not share raw data between the client and server, thereby safeguarding potentially sensitive information. However, there are still vulnerabilities in the FL field, and commonly used approaches, such as encryption and blockchain technologies, often result in significant computational and communication costs, making them impractical for devices with restricted resources. To tackle this challenge, we present a privacy-preserving FL system specifically designed for resource-constrained devices, leveraging compressive sensing and differential privacy (DP) techniques. We implemented the weight-pruning-based compressive sensing method with an adaptive compression ratio based on resource availability. In addition, we employ DP to introduce noise to the gradient before sending it to a central server for aggregation, thereby protecting the gradient’s privacy. Evaluation results demonstrate that our proposed method achieves slightly better accuracy when compared to state-of-the-art methods like DP-federated averaging, DP-FedOpt, and adaptive Gaussian clipping-DP (AGC-DP) for the MNIST, Fashion-MNIST, and Human Activity Recognition data sets. Furthermore, our approach achieves this higher accuracy with a lower total communication cost and training time than the current state-of-the-art methods. Moreover, we comprehensively evaluate our method’s resilience against poisoning attacks, revealing its better resistance than existing state-of-the-art approaches.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jiot.2023.3347552

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Hidayat, M. A., Nakamura, Y., & Arakawa, Y.
Affiliations
Kyushu University (JP)
Venue
IEEE Internet of Things Journal
Published
2024-04-15
Volume
11
Issue
8
Pages
13180-13198
ISSN
  • 2327-4662 (ISSN-L)
  • 2372-2541
OpenAlex
W4390285324
Cited by
29
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 7
FWCI
2.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Internet of Things Journal (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI (JP19KT0020)
  • Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), PRESTO (JPMJPR21P7)
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
Keywords
privacy-preserving federated learning, edge devices, compressed sensing, weight pruning, differential privacy, gradient privacy, communication cost reduction, poisoning attacks, resource-constrained devices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review