The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Study on Breath Acetone in Diabetic Patients Using a Cavity Ringdown Breath Analyzer: Exploring Correlations of Breath Acetone With Blood Glucose and Glycohemoglobin A1C
Abstract
Acetone is qualitatively known as a biomarker of diabetes; however, the quantitative information on acetone concentration in diabetic breath is incomplete, and the knowledge of correlations of breath acetone with diabetic diagnostic parameters, namely, blood glucose (BG) and glycohemoglobin A1C (A1C), are unknown. We utilized a pilot-scale breath acetone analyzer based on the cavity ringdown spectroscopy (CRDS) technique to conduct breath tests with 34 Type 1 diabetic (T1D), ten Type 2 diabetic (T2D) patients, and 15 apparently healthy individuals. Relations between breath acetone and BG, A1C, and several other bio indices, such as the type of diabetes, onset-time, gender, age, and weight were investigated. Our observations show that a linear correlation between the mean group acetone and the mean group BG level does exist (R = 0.98, P < 0.02) when all the T1D subjects tested are grouped by different BG levels, 40-100, 101-150, 151-200, and 201-419 mg/dL. Similarly, among the T1D subjects studied, when their A1C's are grouped by < 7, 7-9.9, and 10-13, a linear correlation between the mean group A1C and the mean group acetone concentration is observed (R = 0.98, P < 0.02). No strong correlations are observed when the BG and A1C numbers are not grouped. The mean breath acetone concentration in the T1D subjects studied in this work is determined to be 2.19 ppmv (parts per million by volume), which is higher than the mean breath acetone concentration, 0.48 ppmv, in the 15 healthy people tested.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Turner, C., Španěl, P., & Smith, D. (2006) · Physiological Measurement · doi:10.1088/0967-3334/27/4/001 · Cited by 379
Acetone metabolism during diabetic ketoacidosis
Owen, O. E., Trapp, V. E., Skutches, C. L., Mozzoli, M. A., Hoeldtke, R. D., Boden, G., & Reichard, G. A. (1982) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/diab.31.3.242 · Cited by 190
Cited by
Sensors for Breath Testing: From Nanomaterials to Comprehensive Disease Detection
Konvalina, G., & Haick, H. (2014) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar400070m · Cited by 561
Non-Invasive Blood Glucose Monitoring Technology: A Review
Tang, L., Chang, S. J., Chen, C.-J., & Liu, J.-T. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20236925 · Cited by 481
Sensing Technologies for Detection of Acetone in Human Breath for Diabetes Diagnosis and Monitoring
Saasa, V., Malwela, T., Beukes, M., Mokgotho, M., Liu, C.-P., & Mwakikunga, B. (2018) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics8010012 · Cited by 287
Review of Non-Invasive Glucose Sensing Techniques: Optical, Electrical and Breath Acetone
Shokrekhodaei, M., & Quinones, S. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20051251 · Cited by 221
Electronic nose: a non-invasive technology for breath analysis of diabetes and lung cancer patients
Behera, B., Joshi, R., Anil Vishnu, G. K., Bhalerao, S., & Pandya, H. J. (2019) · Journal of Breath Research · doi:10.1088/1752-7163/aafc77 · Cited by 179
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, C., Mbi, A., & Shepherd, M.
- Venue
- IEEE Sensors Journal
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 54-63
- ISSN
- 1530-437X (ISSN-L)
- 1558-1748
- OpenAlex
- W2138217742
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Study on Breath Acetone in Diabetic Patients Using a Cavity Ringdown Breath Analyzer: Exploring Correlations of Breath Acetone With Blood Glucose and Glycohemoglobin A1C. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jsen.2009.2035730
- The paper
- Wang, C., Mbi, A., & Shepherd, M. (2010). A Study on Breath Acetone in Diabetic Patients Using a Cavity Ringdown Breath Analyzer: Exploring Correlations of Breath Acetone With Blood Glucose and Glycohemoglobin A1C. IEEE Sensors Journal. https://doi.org/10.1109/jsen.2009.2035730
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.