Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 451

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A 2 $\mu\hbox{W}$ 100 nV/rtHz Chopper-Stabilized Instrumentation Amplifier for Chronic Measurement of Neural Field Potentials

Denison, Tim, Consoer, Kelly, Santa, Wesley, Avestruz, Al-Thaddeus, Cooley, John, Kelly, Andy·2007·IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits

Abstract

This paper describes a prototype micropower instrumentation amplifier intended for chronic sensing of neural field potentials (NFPs). NFPs represent the ensemble activity of thousands of neurons and code-useful information for both normal activity and disease states. NFPs are small - of the order of tens of muV- and reside at low bandwidths that make them susceptible to excess noise. Therefore, to ensure the highest fidelity of signal measurement for diagnostic analysis, the amplifier is chopper-stabilized to eliminate 1/f and popcorn noise. The circuit was prototyped in an 0.8 mum CMOS process and consumes under 2.0 muW from a 1.8 V supply. A noise floor of 0.98 muVrms was achieved over a bandwidth from 0.05 to 100 Hz; the noise-efficiency factor of 4.6 is one of the lowest published to date. A flexible on-chip high-pass filter is used to suppress front-end electrode offsets while maintaining relevant physiological data. The monolithic architect and micropower low-noise low-supply operation could help enable applications ranging from neuroprosthetics to seizure monitors that require a small form factor and battery operation. Although the focus of this paper is on neurophysiological sensing, the circuit architecture can be applied generally to micropower sensor interfaces that benefit from chopper stabilization.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jssc.2007.908664

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. rise, 2004, Deep Brain Stimulation and Epilepsy
  2. makinwa, 2007, dynamic offset cancellation techniques in cmos, IEEE ISSCC Tutorial Session
  3. makinwa, 2001, a wind sensor with an integrated low-offset instrumentation amplifier, Proc ICECS, 3, 1505
  4. 10.1109/ISSCC.2002.993094 · doi:10.1109/isscc.2002.993094
  5. 10.1023/A:1024422319674 · doi:10.1023/a:1024422319674
  6. 10.1109/ICECS.1998.814893 · doi:10.1109/icecs.1998.814893
  7. wu, 2006, a iv 2.3 mw biomedical signal acquisition ic, IEEE ISSCC Dig Tech Papers, 119
  8. 10.1109/JSSC.2006.884195 · doi:10.1109/jssc.2006.884195

Cited by

See all 451

Metadata

Authors
Denison, T., Consoer, K., Santa, W., Avestruz, A.-T., Cooley, J., & Kelly, A.
Venue
IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits
Published
2007-12
Volume
42
Issue
12
Pages
2934-2945
ISSN
0018-9200 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2108560657
Cited by
451
References
20
FWCI
11.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A 2 $\mu\hbox{W}$ 100 nV/rtHz Chopper-Stabilized Instrumentation Amplifier for Chronic Measurement of Neural Field Potentials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/jssc.2007.908664
The paper
Denison, T., Consoer, K., Santa, W., Avestruz, A.-T., Cooley, J., & Kelly, A. (2007). A 2 $\mu\hbox{W}$ 100 nV/rtHz Chopper-Stabilized Instrumentation Amplifier for Chronic Measurement of Neural Field Potentials. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits. https://doi.org/10.1109/jssc.2007.908664

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.