Cited by 237Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design

A High Dynamic-Range Neural Recording Chopper Amplifier for Simultaneous Neural Recording and Stimulation

Chandrakumar, Hariprasad, Markovic, Dejan·2017·IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits

Abstract

Closed-loop neuromodulation is essential for the advance of neuroscience and for administering therapy in patients suffering from drug-resistant neurological conditions. Neural stimulation generates large artifacts at the recording sites, which easily saturate traditional recording front ends. This paper presents a neural recording chopper amplifier capable of handling in-band artifacts up to 40 mVpp while preserving the accompanying small neural signals. New techniques have been proposed that solve the issues of low input impedance and electrode-offset rejection, which enable a DC input impedance of 300 MΩ and a dynamic range of 69 dB (200 Hz-5 kHz) and 78 dB (1-200 Hz). Implemented in a 40-nm CMOS process, the prototype occupies an area of 0.071 mm2/channel, and consumes 2 μW from a 1.2 V supply. The input-referred noise is 7 μVrms(200 Hz-20 kHz) and 2 μVrms(1-200 Hz). The total harmonic distortion for a 20-mVpinput at 1 kHz is -74 dB. This paper improves the linearity by 14-26 dB, dynamic range by 11-28 dB, and input-impedance for chopped front ends by a factor of 11 as compared with the current state of the art, while achieving similar power and noise performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jssc.2016.2645611

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Chopping significantly reduces the amplifier's input impedance due to the combination of the switched capacitor C_I and the passive mixer at the input.

    “Chopping significantly reduces the amplifier's input impedance due to the combination of the switched capacitor C I and the passive mixer at the input [177].”
  • A common combination composed of a chopper amplifier and an ADC is proposed in Chandrakumar and Markovic (2017; 2018) and Samiei and Hashemi (2019; 2021).

    “A common combination composed of a chopper amplifier and the ADC is proposed in Chandrakumar and Markovic (2017; 2018) and Samiei and Hashemi (2019; 2021).”

    From Advances in Neural Recording and Stimulation Integrated Circuits (2021) · cites this paper as Chandrakumar and Markovic, 2017

  • After band-pass amplification, the up-converted signal is down-converted to its original frequency, and the DC offset and flicker noise are up-converted away from the signal.

    “After band-pass amplification, the up-converted signal is down-converted to its original frequency, and the DC offset and flicker noise are up-converted away from the signal.”

    From Advances in Neural Recording and Stimulation Integrated Circuits (2021) · cites this paper as Chandrakumar and Markovic, 2017

  • The chopper up-converts the low-frequency biological signal to the carrier frequency, away from the DC offset and flicker noise.

    “To eliminate the influence of the operational amplifiers’ low-frequency noise and the DC offset, the chopper is used to up-convert the low-frequency biological signal to the carrier frequency (Fclk), away from the DC offset and flicker noise.”

    From Advances in Neural Recording and Stimulation Integrated Circuits (2021) · cites this paper as Chandrakumar and Markovic, 2017

  • Chopping is an effective way to reduce the low-frequency flicker noise of the amplifier.

    “As shown in Figure 4E, chopping is an effective way to reduce the low-frequency flicker noise of the amplifier.”

    From Advances in Neural Recording and Stimulation Integrated Circuits (2021) · cites this paper as Chandrakumar and Markovic, 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chandrakumar, H., & Markovic, D.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits
Published
2017-03
Volume
52
Issue
3
Pages
645-656
ISSN
  • 0018-9200 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-173X
OpenAlex
W2582798323
Cited by
237
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 6
FWCI
9.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) through DARPA’s Restoring Active Memory (RAM) Program (N66001-14-4029)
  • SPAWAR contracting office
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Radio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Keywords
closed-loop neuromodulation, stimulation artifacts, dynamic range, input impedance, low-power analog front-end, 40-nm CMOS, input-referred noise, total harmonic distortion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review