Cited by 46Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsChildren's Physical and Motor DevelopmentInfant Development and Preterm Care

Identification of Developmental Delay in Infants Using Wearable Sensors: Full-Day Leg Movement Statistical Feature Analysis

Open access
Abrishami, Mohammad Saeed, Nocera, Luciano, Mert, Melissa, Trujillo-Priego, Ivan A., Purushotham, Sanjay, Shahabi, Cyrus, Smith, Beth A.·2019·IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine

Abstract

This paper examines how features extracted from full-day data recorded by wearable sensors are able to differentiate between infants with typical development and those with or at risk for developmental delays. Wearable sensors were used to collect full-day (8-13 h) leg movement data from infants with typical development ([Formula: see text]) and infants at risk for developmental delay ([Formula: see text]). At 24 months, at-risk infants were assessed as having good ([Formula: see text]) or poor ([Formula: see text]) developmental outcomes. With this limited size dataset, our statistical analysis indicated that accelerometer features collected earlier in infancy differentiated between at-risk infants with poor and good outcomes at 24 months, as well as infants with typical development. This paper also tested how these features performed on a subset of the data for which the infant movement was known, i.e., 5-min intervals more representative of clinical observations. Our results on this limited dataset indicated that features for full-day data showed more group differences than similar features for the 5-min intervals, supporting the usefulness of full-day movement monitoring.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jtehm.2019.2893223

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Alternative strategies for high-resolution analysis of an infant's motor development involve quantitative data from digital imaging systems or commercial wearable sensors packages, often also with electroencephalography or electromyography.

    “Alternative strategies for high-resolution analysis of an infant’s motor development involve quantitative data from digital imaging systems or commercial wearable sensors packages (11–15), often also with electroencephalography (16) or electromyography (17).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abrishami, M. S., Nocera, L., Mert, M., Trujillo-Priego, I. A., Purushotham, S., Shahabi, C., & Smith, B. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Corresponding author
Abrishami, Mohammad Saeed
Venue
IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine
Published
2019
Volume
7
Pages
1-7
ISSN
2168-2372 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2914134360
Cited by
46
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4
FWCI
2.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • American Physical Therapy Association
  • USC Integrated Media Systems Center
  • Foundation for Physical Therapy
  • Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (K12-HD055929 (KO))
  • National Science Foundation (1706964 (BAS and MM))
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Children's Physical and Motor Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
developmental delay, infants, wearable sensors, accelerometer, leg movement, statistical features, high-risk infants, developmental outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review