Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 353

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Training Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Land–Cover Classification of High-Resolution Imagery

Scott, Grant J., England, Matthew R., Starms, William A., Marcum, Richard A., Davis, Curt H.·2017·IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters

Abstract

Deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) have recently emerged as a dominant paradigm for machine learning in a variety of domains. However, acquiring a suitably large data set for training DCNN is often a significant challenge. This is a major issue in the remote sensing domain, where we have extremely large collections of satellite and aerial imagery, but lack the rich label information that is often readily available for other image modalities. In this letter, we investigate the use of DCNN for land-cover classification in high-resolution remote sensing imagery. To overcome the lack of massive labeled remote-sensing image data sets, we employ two techniques in conjunction with DCNN: transfer learning (TL) with fine-tuning and data augmentation tailored specifically for remote sensing imagery. TL allows one to bootstrap a DCNN while preserving the deep visual feature extraction learned over an image corpus from a different image domain. Data augmentation exploits various aspects of remote sensing imagery to dramatically expand small training image data sets and improve DCNN robustness for remote sensing image data. Here, we apply these techniques to the well-known UC Merced data set to achieve the land-cover classification accuracies of 97.8 ± 2.3%, 97.6 ± 2.6%, and 98.5 ± 1.4% with CaffeNet, GoogLeNet, and ResNet, respectively.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/lgrs.2017.2657778

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. dietterich, 1997, Special issue on inductive transfer, Mach Learn, 28, 5, 10.1023/A:1007355226281 · DOI
  2. 10.1109/LGRS.2015.2453130 · DOI
  3. 10.1109/LGRS.2015.2503142 · DOI
  4. 10.1109/LGRS.2015.2483680 · DOI · Paper page
  5. jiang, 2012, Spatial partition for scene recognition, Computer-Vision ECCV 96, 7573, 730
  6. 10.1109/LGRS.2015.2499239 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1109/CVPRW.2015.7301382 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2444405 · DOI
  9. 10.1145/1869790.1869829 · DOI
  10. 10.1109/TGRS.2014.2351395 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/s11760-015-0804-2 · DOI
  12. 10.1145/2647868.2654889 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1109/CBMI.2014.6849835 · DOI
  14. 10.1109/CVPR.2014.413 · DOI
  15. 10.1109/LGRS.2010.2055033 · DOI · Paper page
  16. glorot, 2011, Deep sparse rectifier neural networks, Proc Int Conf Artif Intell Statist, 315
  17. 10.1080/01431161.2011.608740 · DOI

Cited by

See all 353

Metadata

Authors
Scott, G. J., England, M. R., Starms, W. A., Marcum, R. A., & Davis, C. H.
Venue
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters
Published
2017-04
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
549-553
ISSN
  • 1545-598X (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0571
OpenAlex
W4248710273
Cited by
353
References
4
FWCI
36.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.