Cited by 246Sentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningEmotion and Mood RecognitionTopic Modeling

How Intense Are You? Predicting Intensities of Emotions and Sentiments using Stacked Ensemble [Application Notes]

Open access
Akhtar, Md Shad, Ekbal, Asif, Cambria, Erik·2020·IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine

Abstract

Emotions and sentiments are subjective in nature. They differ on a case-to-case basis. However, predicting only the emotion and sentiment does not always convey complete information. The degree or level of emotions and sentiments often plays a crucial role in understanding the exact feeling within a single class (e.g., `good' versus `awesome'). In this paper, we propose a stacked ensemble method for predicting the degree of intensity for emotion and sentiment by combining the outputs obtained from several deep learning and classical feature-based models using a multi-layer perceptron network. We develop three deep learning models based on convolutional neural network, long short-term memory and gated recurrent unit and one classical supervised model based on support vector regression. We evaluate our proposed technique for two problems, i.e., emotion analysis in the generic domain and sentiment analysis in the financial domain. The proposed model shows impressive results for both the problems. Comparisons show that our proposed model achieves improved performance over the existing state-of-the-art systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mci.2019.2954667

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. J. Wiebe and R. Mihalcea, "Word sense and subjectiv- ity," in Proc. Int. Conf. Computational Linguistics/ Association of Computational Linguistics, Sydney, Australia, 2006, pp. 1065-1072.
  2. S. Bird, E. Klein, and E. Loper, Natural Language Processing with Python: Analyzing Text with the Natural Lan- guage Toolkit. O'Reilly Media, 2009.
  3. S. Khosla, N. Chhaya, and K. Chawla, "Aff2Vec: Affect-enriched distributional word representations," in Proc. 27th Int. Conf. Computational Linguistics, Santa Fe, NM, 2018, pp. 2204-2218.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Akhtar, M. S., Ekbal, A., & Cambria, E.
Affiliations
  • Indian Institute of Technology Patna (IN)
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
Venue
IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine
Published
2020-02
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
64-75
ISSN
  • 1556-603X (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-6048
OpenAlex
W3000271234
Cited by
246
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 101 · 2020: 24
FWCI
19.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine (publishedVersion)
  • DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Electronics and Information technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
emotion intensity prediction, stacking ensemble, multilayer perceptron, convolutional neural networks, long short-term memory, gated recurrent unit, support vector regression, financial sentiment analysis, emotion analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review