Cited by 129Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting MaterialsHuman Mobility and Location-Based Analysis

Multimodal Wearable Sensing for Fine-Grained Activity Recognition in Healthcare

De, Debraj, Bharti, Pratool, Das, Sajal K., Chellappan, Sriram·2015·IEEE Internet Computing

Abstract

State-of-the-art in-home activity recognition schemes with wearable devices are mostly capable of detecting coarse-grained activities (sitting, standing, walking, or lying down), but can't distinguish complex activities (sitting on the floor versus the sofa or bed). Such schemes often aren't effective for emerging critical healthcare applications -- for example, in remote monitoring of patients with Alzheimer's disease, bulimia, or anorexia -- because they require a more comprehensive, contextual, and fine-grained recognition of complex daily user activities. Here, a novel approach for in-home, fine-grained activity recognition uses multimodal wearable sensors on multiple body positions, along with lightly deployed Bluetooth beacons in the environment. In particular, this solution exploits measuring user's ambient environment and location context with wearable sensing and Bluetooth beacons, along with user movement captured with accelerometer and gyroscope sensors. The proposed algorithm is a two-level supervised classifier with both levels running on a server. In the first level, multisensor data from wearables on each body position are collected and analyzed using the proposed modified conditional random field (CRF)-based supervised activity classifier. The classified activity state from each of the wearables data are then fused for deciding the user's final activity state. Preliminary experimental results are presented on the classification of 19 complex daily activities of a user at home.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mic.2015.72

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De, D., Bharti, P., Das, S. K., & Chellappan, S.
Affiliations
Missouri University of Science and Technology (US)
Venue
IEEE Internet Computing
Published
2015-09
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
26-35
ISSN
1089-7801 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1911418635
Cited by
129
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10
FWCI
11.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Internet Computing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
Keywords
fine-grained activity recognition, home monitoring, Bluetooth beacons, conditional random fields, sensor fusion, accelerometer and gyroscope, remote patient monitoring, Alzheimer's disease, location context

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review