Cited by 356Emotion and Mood RecognitionContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsDigital Mental Health Interventions

Mental health monitoring with multimodal sensing and machine learning: A survey

Open access
Garcia-Ceja, Enrique, Riegler, Michael, Nordgreen, Tine, Jakobsen, Petter, Oedegaard, Ketil J., Tørresen, Jim·2018·Pervasive and Mobile Computing

Abstract

Personal and ubiquitous sensing technologies such as smartphones have allowed the continuous collection of data in an unobtrusive manner. Machine learning methods have been applied to continuous sensor data to predict user contextual information such as location, mood, physical activity, etc. Recently, there has been a growing interest in leveraging ubiquitous sensing technologies for mental health care applications, thus, allowing the automatic continuous monitoring of different mental conditions such as depression, anxiety, stress, and so on. This paper surveys recent research works in mental health monitoring systems (MHMS) using sensor data and machine learning. We focused on research works about mental disorders/conditions such as: depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, stress, etc. We propose a classification taxonomy to guide the review of related works and present the overall phases of MHMS. Moreover, research challenges in the field and future opportunities are also discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pmcj.2018.09.003

Cites

185 of 185 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

8 of the 193 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. R. LiKamWa, Y. Liu, N.D. Lane, L. Zhong, Can your smartphone infer your mood, in: PhoneSense workshop, 2011, pp. 1-5.
  2. G.A. Seber, A.J. Lee, Linear Regression Analysis, vol. 329, John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
  3. S.J. Pan, Q. Yang, A survey on transfer learning, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 22 (10) (2010) 1345-1359.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garcia-Ceja, E., Riegler, M., Nordgreen, T., Jakobsen, P., Oedegaard, K. J., & Tørresen, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Oslo (NO)
  • Haukeland University Hospital (NO)
Corresponding author
Garcia-Ceja, Enrique
Venue
Pervasive and Mobile Computing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
51
Pages
1-26
ISSN
1574-1192 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2890929258
Cited by
356
References
193
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 14
FWCI
28.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Pervasive and Mobile Computing (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Norwegian Research Council (259293/o70)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
mental health monitoring, ubiquitous sensing, smartphones, multimodal sensing, depression detection, anxiety detection, stress detection, bipolar disorder, continuous monitoring, classification taxonomy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review