Cited by 207Data-Driven Disease SurveillanceSocial Media in Health EducationMental Health via Writing

How Social Media Will Change Public Health

Dredze, Mark·2012·IEEE Intelligent Systems

Abstract

Recent work in machine learning and natural language processing has studied the health content of tweets and demonstrated the potential for extracting useful public health information from their aggregation. This article examines the types of health topics discussed on Twitter, and how tweets can both augment existing public health capabilities and enable new ones. The author also discusses key challenges that researchers must address to deliver high-quality tools to the public health community.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mis.2012.76

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dredze, M.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Dredze, Mark
Venue
IEEE Intelligent Systems
Published
2012-07
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
81-84
ISSN
1541-1672 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969894105
Cited by
207
References
9
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 9
FWCI
9.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Intelligent Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
Keywords
social media, public health, Twitter, tweets, health topics, natural language processing, machine learning, disease surveillance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review