Wearable Wireless Health Monitoring: Current Developments, Challenges, and Future Trends
Abstract
Wearable health-monitoring systems are becoming very popular, especially in enabling the noninvasive diagnosis of vital functions of the human body. Besides typical singular heartbeat or perspiration sensors, which have been commercially available in recent years, the deployment of a series of body-worn sensors can enable an effective health-monitoring mechanism. The combined information obtained from such systems can either be relayed directly to any health-monitoring personnel in the case of emergencies or can be logged and analyzed as a part of preventive health measures. However, the deployment of on-body nodes for humans must be performed with care, as they may interfere with the patients' regular movements. This is especially challenging because the relationship between the electromagnetic waves is influenced by the patient's movements, distance from the nearest base station, operating environment, etc. Additional challenges to the deployment of such mechanisms are also faced in situations where the nodes require additional on-body space, impose additional weight, or are not conformal enough to the patient's body. On the hardware design aspect, the sensory and communication functions on the electronic node have to be designed using special materials to avoid reliability issues or damage due to repeated or intense movements. Finally, and perhaps the most important aspect that needs to be addressed concerning such systems, is their electromagnetic safety level, which is defined by their specific absorption rates (SARs). This article aims to review the latest developments in body-worn wireless health-monitoring systems and their current challenges and limitations and to discuss future trends for such worn devices for these applications.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The surface of the skin consists of features having 10-1000 μm height.
“The surface of the skin consists of features having 10–1000 µm height and it can be assumed to be a bilayer structure: the epidermis (thickness = 0.05–1.50 mm, Young's modulus = 140–600 kPa) and the dermis (thickness = 0.3–3.0 mm, Young's modulus = 2–80 kPa).14”
From Wearables in Medicine (2018) · cites this paper as [14]
The skin bilayer is linearly elastic for tensile strain values < 15% and enters plastic deformation above 30%.
“This skin bilayer is linearly elastic for tensile strain values < 15% and enters plastic deformation above 30%.”
From Wearables in Medicine (2018) · cites this paper as [14]
Cites
Wireless body sensor networks for health-monitoring applications
Hao, Y., & Foster, R. (2008) · Physiological Measurement · doi:10.1088/0967-3334/29/11/r01 · Cited by 404 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wearable salivary uric acid mouthguard biosensor with integrated wireless electronics
Kim, J., Imani, S., de Araujo, W. R., Warchall, J., Valdés-Ramírez, G., Paixão, T. R. L. C., Mercier, P. P., & Wang, J. (2015) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/j.bios.2015.07.039 · Cited by 678 · see citing works
Yetisen, A. K., Martinez‐Hurtado, J. L., Ünal, B., Khademhosseini, A., & Butt, H. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201706910 · Cited by 569 · see citing works
Wearable Devices for Ambulatory Cardiac Monitoring
Sana, F., Isselbacher, E. M., Singh, J. P., Heist, E. K., Pathik, B., & Armoundas, A. A. (2020) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2020.01.046 · Cited by 362 · see citing works
Baig, M. M., GholamHosseini, H., Moqeem, A. A., Mirza, F., & Lindén, M. (2017) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-017-0760-1 · Cited by 351 · see citing works
Cavitas Sensors: Contact Lens Type Sensors & Mouthguard Sensors
Mitsubayashi, K., & Arakawa, T. (2016) · Electroanalysis · doi:10.1002/elan.201600083 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Hong, W., & Lee, W. G. (2020) · The Analyst · doi:10.1039/d0an01484b · Cited by 47 · see citing works
- Authors
- Soh, P. J., Vandenbosch, G. A. E., Mercuri, M., & Schreurs, D. M. M.-P.
- Affiliations
- Universiti Malaysia Perlis (MY)
- KU Leuven (BE)
- Venue
- IEEE Microwave Magazine
- Published
- 2015-05
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 55-70
- ISSN
- 1527-3342 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2069326401
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 10
- FWCI
- 14.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Microwave Magazine (publishedVersion)
- Archive of Doctoral Theses and Digital Collections (University of Calabria) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Wireless Body Area Networks
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
- Keywords
- wearable health monitoring, wearable sensors, wireless health monitoring, on-body communication, specific absorption rate, electromagnetic safety, non-invasive vital sign monitoring, preventive medicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review