Cited by 22Image and Video Quality AssessmentSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GIoT and Edge/Fog Computing

An NFV-Based Video Quality Assessment Method over 5G Small Cell Networks

Kourtis, Michail-Alexandros, Koumaras, Harilaos, Xilouris, George, Liberal, Fidel·2017·IEEE MultiMedia

Abstract

A video quality assessment mechanism for next-generation (5G) mobile networks uses the small cell deployment architecture to implement a virtual network function to enable in-service monitoring of delivered video quality.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mmul.2017.265091534

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kourtis, M.-A., Koumaras, H., Xilouris, G., & Liberal, F.
Affiliations
  • National Centre of Scientific Research "Demokritos" (GR)
  • University of the Basque Country (ES)
Venue
IEEE MultiMedia
Published
2017-10
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
68-78
ISSN
1070-986X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2626738293
Cited by
22
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Multimedia (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software-Defined Networks and 5G
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Keywords
video quality assessment, next generation networks, 5G, small cell networks, network function virtualization, virtual network functions, in-service monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review