Cited by 19EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesMuscle activation and electromyography studiesNeuroscience and Neural Engineering

Brain-Machine Interfaces: The Perception-Action Closed Loop: A Two-Learner System

Open access
Millan, Jose del R.·2015·IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Magazine

Abstract

A brain-machine interface (BMI) is about transforming neural activity into action and sensation into perception (Figure 1). In a BMI system, neural signals recorded from the brain are fed into a decoding algorithm that translates these signals into motor outputs to control a variety of practical devices for motor-disabled people [1]-[5]. Feedback from the prosthetic device, conveyed to the user either via normal sensory pathways or directly through brain stimulation, establishes a closed control loop.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/msmc.2014.2386901

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Successful BCI requires that the user and the embedded decoder engage in a mutual learning process, in which users must learn to generate distinct brain patterns for different mental tasks, while machine learning techniques ought to discover, interpret, and allow a model's adaptation to the potentially changing individual brain patterns associated to these tasks.

    “Under this view, successful BCI requires that the user and the embedded decoder engage in a mutual learning process, in which users must learn to generate distinct brain patterns for different mental tasks, while machine learning techniques ought to discover, interpret, and allow a model’s adaptation to the potentially changing individual brain patterns associated to these tasks [22].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Millan, J. D. R.
Venue
IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Magazine
Published
2015-01
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
6-8
ISSN
2333-942X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2329385490
Cited by
19
References
12
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Systems Man and Cybernetics Magazine (publishedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
Keywords
brain-computer interface, perception-action loop, feedback control, neural decoding, motor control, prosthesis, sensory feedback, motor impairment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review