Cited by 117EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringMuscle activation and electromyography studies

Advances in Neuroprosthetic Learning and Control

Open access
Carmena, Jose M.·2013·PLoS Biology

Abstract

Significant progress has occurred in the field of brain-machine interfaces (BMI) since the first demonstrations with rodents, monkeys, and humans controlling different prosthetic devices directly with neural activity. This technology holds great potential to aid large numbers of people with neurological disorders. However, despite this initial enthusiasm and the plethora of available robotic technologies, existing neural interfaces cannot as yet master the control of prosthetic, paralyzed, or otherwise disabled limbs. Here I briefly discuss recent advances from our laboratory into the neural basis of BMIs that should lead to better prosthetic control and clinically viable solutions, as well as new insights into the neurobiology of action.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001561

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Frequent or continuous recalibration, especially when accompanied by re-selecting the classifier's features, creates a situation in which the subject's learning could be hindered by the demand to adapt to a continuously changing decoder.

    “Frequent or continuous recalibration, especially in case it is accompanied by re-selecting the classifier’s features, creates a situation in which the subject’s learning could be hindered by the demand to adapt to a continuously changing decoder [29,70].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carmena, J. M.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Carmena, Jose M.
Venue
PLoS Biology
Published
2013-05-21
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
e1001561
ISSN
  • 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-7885
OpenAlex
W2172103792
Cited by
117
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 8
FWCI
11.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0954243, CAREER, N66001-10-C-2008)
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • Christopher and Dana Reeve Foundation
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (N66001-10-C-2008)
  • Advanced Research Projects Agency
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Keywords
brain-computer interface, neuroprosthetics, prosthetic control, neural decoding, paralysis, neurological disorders, robotic prosthetics
MeSH terms
Animals, Haplorhini, Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Robotics, User-Computer Interface, Neural Prostheses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review