The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Blockchain-Based Solutions to Security and Privacy Issues in the Internet of Things
Abstract
IoT is leading a digital revolution in both academia and industry. It brings convenience to people's daily lives; however, the issues of security and privacy of IoT become challenges. Blockchain, a decentralized database based on cryptographic techniques, is promising for IoT security, which may influence a variety of areas including manufacture, finance, and trading. The blockchain framework in an IoT system is an intriguing alternative to the traditional centralized model, which is struggling to meet some specified demands in IoT. In this article, we investigate typical security and privacy issues in IoT and develop a framework to integrate blockchain with IoT, which can provide great assurance for IoT data and various functionalities and desirable scalability including authentication, decentralized payment, and so on. We also suggest some possible solutions to these security and privacy issues in IoT based on blockchain and Ethereum to show how blockchain contributes to IoT.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The adoption of blockchain in IoT can overcome the single point of failure and serve as an adequate means to securely and efficiently store and process IoT data [8].”
From A survey on the adoption of blockchain in IoT: challenges and solutions (2021) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“blockchain, with its decentralized nature, is a promising technique for effectively solving bottleneck and one-point failure problems by eliminating the need for a trusted third party in the IoT network [8].”
From A survey on the adoption of blockchain in IoT: challenges and solutions (2021) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“Enhanced Security: blockchain is more reliable and secure than other record-keeping systems from several aspects [8].”
From A survey on the adoption of blockchain in IoT: challenges and solutions (2021) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“Due to the restricted power and storage resources of IoT devices, vast amounts of data streamed from many devices creates a bottleneck for the current IoT systems, which results in low QoS [8].”
From A survey on the adoption of blockchain in IoT: challenges and solutions (2021) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“Most existing IoT architecture maintains a centralized data centre for storing and processing sensors' data, which can be at risk of breaching security, single-point failure and malicious attacks like DDoS, Sybil attack [8,10,273].”
From A survey on the adoption of blockchain in IoT: challenges and solutions (2021) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“Obviously, the current blockchain systems have serious scalability bottlenecks regarding the number of replicas in the network as well the performance concerns such as constrained throughput (number of transactions per second) and latency (required time for adding a block of transactions in the blockchain) [288].”
From Blockchain for 5G and beyond networks: A state of the art survey (2020) · cites this paper as [288]
Citations
Cites
The Internet of Things: A survey
Atzori, L., Iera, A., & Morabito, G. (2010) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.010 · Cited by 15,613
Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash SystemPreprint
Nakamoto, S. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3440802 · Cited by 14,677
Blockchains and smart contracts for the internet of things
Christidis, K., & Devetsikiotis, M. (2016) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2016.2566339 · Cited by 4,552
Securing Smart Cities Using Blockchain Technology
Biswas, K., & Muthukkumarasamy, V. (2016) · 2016 IEEE 18th International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications; IEEE 14th International Conference on Smart City; IEEE 2nd International Conference on Data Science and Systems (HPCC/SmartCity/DSS) · doi:10.1109/hpcc-smartcity-dss.2016.0198 · Cited by 601
Blockchain in internet of things: Challenges and SolutionsPreprint
Dorri, A., Kanhere, S. S., & Jurdak, R. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1608.05187 · Cited by 556
The IoT electric business model: Using blockchain technology for the internet of things
Zhang, Y., & Wen, J. (2016) · Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications · doi:10.1007/s12083-016-0456-1 · Cited by 554
Inclusive Block Chain Protocols
Lewenberg, Y., Sompolinsky, Y., & Zohar, A. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-47854-7_33 · Cited by 322
Achieving Efficient and Secure Data Acquisition for Cloud-Supported Internet of Things in Smart Grid
Guan, Z., Li, J., Wu, L., Zhang, Y., Wu, J., & Du, X. (2017) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2017.2690522 · Cited by 244
Fuzzy Identity-Based Data Integrity Auditing for Reliable Cloud Storage Systems
Li, Y., Yu, Y. H., Min, G., Susilo, W., Ni, J., & Choo, K. R. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing · doi:10.1109/tdsc.2017.2662216 · Cited by 221
Khajenasiri, I., Estebsari, A., Verhelst, M., & Gielen, G. E. (2017) · Energy Procedia · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.239 · Cited by 215
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- sompolinsky, 2013, Accelerating Bitcoins Transaction Processing, Fast money grows on trees not chains
- khan, 2017, loT Security: Review, Blockchain Solutions, and Open Challenges, Futur Cener Comput Syst
- szabo, 1996, Smart Contracts: Building Blocks for Digital Markets, EXTROPY The Journal of Transhumanist Thought, 16
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey on IoT Security: Application Areas, Security Threats, and Solution Architectures
Hassija, V., Chamola, V., Saxena, V., Jain, D., Goyal, P., & Sikdar, B. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2924045 · Cited by 1,445
Wahab, O. A., Mourad, A., Otrok, H., & Taleb, T. (2021) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2021.3058573 · Cited by 506
Blockchain for 5G and beyond networks: A state of the art survey
Nguyen, D. C., Pathirana, P. N., Ding, M., & Seneviratne, A. (2020) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102693 · Cited by 412
A survey on the adoption of blockchain in IoT: challenges and solutions
Uddin, M. A., Stranieri, A., Gondal, I., & Balasubramanian, V. (2021) · Blockchain: Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.bcra.2021.100006 · Cited by 365
Blockchain for IoT-based smart cities: Recent advances, requirements, and future challenges
Majeed, U., Khan, L. U., Yaqoob, I., Kazmi, S. M. A., Salah, K., & Hong, C. S. (2021) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2021.103007 · Cited by 321
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, Y., Li, Y., Tian, J., & Liu, J.
- Affiliations
- Shaanxi Normal University (CN)
- University of Wollongong (AU)
- Hebei University (CN)
- Beihang University (CN)
- Venue
- IEEE Wireless Communications
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 12-18
- ISSN
- 1536-1284 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0687
- OpenAlex
- W2907164519
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 60.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Wireless Communications (publishedVersion)
- Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
- Keywords
- blockchain, Internet of Things, Internet of Things security, IoT privacy, decentralized authentication, decentralized payment, Ethereum, scalability, cryptographic techniques, decentralized databases
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
