Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 191

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A comparison of semiconductor devices for high-speed logic

Solomon, P.M.·1982·Proceedings of the IEEE

Abstract

The bipolar transistor and FET are compared, considering both today's most advanced implementations and "ultimate" scaled-down devices. The differences between the devices are quantified in terms of transconductance and intrinsic speed. Old limits are re-examined and ways of extending the devices toward their ultimate in performance are proposed. While the major emphasis is on silicon, a comparison is made with the GaAs MESFET. Other semiconductor devices are discussed in the context of "bipolar-like" and "FET-like" devices, and the HEMT is considered a very promising candidate for high-speed logic. While Josephson junction logic is not discussed at length, it is a continual point of reference. In addition to comparing devices, the on-chip wiring environment is discussed, especially concerning its impact on power-delay products.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/proc.1982.12333

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 191

Metadata

Authors
Solomon, P. M.
Venue
Proceedings of the IEEE
Published
1982
Volume
70
Issue
5
Pages
489-509
ISSN
0018-9219 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2025407267
Cited by
191
References
0
FWCI
17.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparison of semiconductor devices for high-speed logic. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/proc.1982.12333
The paper
Solomon, P. M. (1982). A comparison of semiconductor devices for high-speed logic. Proceedings of the IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/proc.1982.12333

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.