Cited by 17Social Robot Interaction and HRISpeech and dialogue systemsEducational Robotics and Engineering

Parents’ Views on Using Social Robots for Language Learning

Tolksdorf, Nils F., Rohlfing, Katharina J.·2020·2020 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)

Abstract

Research in human-robot interaction envisions applications in a variety of areas. In one of them, robots can be used to improve educational performance. However, most scientific investigations focus on learning outcomes without considering the social implications of a robot available as a learning companion. Therefore, the identification of the underlying challenges and issues faced by different stakeholders involved in the technology implementation processes is still sparse. This paper is concerned with parents as a key stakeholder group that is almost overlooked in the existing literature. We present results of a study on child-robot interaction for language learning, in which parents accompanied their children and evaluated the robot after four sessions of experiencing it within a laboratory setting. The results suggest that parents recognize the robots' potential for language learning within a playful interaction with their children. However, as parents reported, the technical challenges for an adaptive and smooth interaction might impede children's learning gains in the long-term.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/ro-man47096.2020.9223540

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Parents generally have positive attitudes toward incorporating robots into their children's learning, but remain concerned about the risk of disrupting school-based learning and potential teacher replacement.

    “Although parents generally have positive attitudes toward incorporating robots into their children's learning, they remain concerned about the risk of disrupting school-based learning and potential teacher replacement [45, 49, 73].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tolksdorf, N. F., & Rohlfing, K. J.
Affiliations
Paderborn University (DE)
Venue
2020 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-08
Pages
634-640
ISSN
1944-9437 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3093775403
Cited by
15
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.47
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE RO-MAN (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Educational Robotics and Engineering
Keywords
social robots, language learning, parents' perspectives, child-robot interaction, human-robot interaction, educational robots, playful learning, technology implementation challenges, adaptive interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review