Cited by 110Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningSocial Robot Interaction and HRISpeech and dialogue systems

Adaptive Robot Language Tutoring Based on Bayesian Knowledge Tracing and Predictive Decision-Making

Open access
Schodde, Thorsten, Bergmann, Kirsten, Kopp, Stefan·2017·Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

Abstract

In this paper, we present an approach to adaptive language tutoring in child-robot interaction. The approach is based on a dynamic probabilistic model that represents the inter-relations between the learner's skills, her observed behaviour in tutoring interaction, and the tutoring action taken by the system. Being implemented in a robot language tutor, the model enables the robot tutor to trace the learner's knowledge and to decide which skill to teach next and how to address it in a game-like tutoring interaction. Results of an evaluation study are discussed demonstrating how participants in the adaptive tutoring condition successfully learned foreign language words.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2909824.3020222

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Physically embodied robots provide adaptive assistance and verbal interaction similar to virtual or conversational agents, yet they foster greater engagement with the physical environment and encourage more advanced social behaviors during learning, leading to improved learning outcomes.

    “Physically embodied robots provide adaptive assistance and verbal interaction similar to virtual or conversational agents [5, 46, 63, 65], yet they foster greater engagement with the physical environment and encourage more advanced social behaviors during learning [2], leading to improved learning outcomes [47].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schodde, T., Bergmann, K., & Kopp, S.
Affiliations
Bielefeld University (DE)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
Publisher
ACM
Published
2017-03-06
Pages
128-136
OpenAlex
W2592042377
Cited by
110
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 3
FWCI
4.52
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (publishedVersion)
  • PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Publikationen an der Universität Bielefeld (Universität Bielefeld) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Horizon 2020 (688014)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
Keywords
child-robot interaction, Bayesian Knowledge Tracing, predictive decision-making, foreign language word learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review