Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 381

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantum cryptography with imperfect apparatus

Open access
Mayers, D., Yao, A.·2002·Proceedings 39th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (Cat. No.98CB36280)

Abstract

Quantum key distribution, first proposed by C.H. Bennett and G. Brassard (1984), provides a possible key distribution scheme whose security depends only on the quantum laws of physics. So far the protocol has been proved secure even under channel noise and detector faults of the receiver but is vulnerable if the photon source used is imperfect. In this paper we propose and give a concrete design for a new concept, self-checking source, which requires the manufacturer of the photon source to provide certain tests; these tests are designed such that, if passed, the source is guaranteed to be adequate for the security of the quantum key distribution protocol, even though the testing devices may not be built to the original specification. The main mathematical result is a structural theorem which states that, for any state in a Hilbert space, if certain EPR-type equations are satisfied, the state must be essentially the orthogonal sum of EPR pairs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/sfcs.1998.743501

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. 10.1016/0375-9601(93)90880-9 · DOI · Paper page
  2. schmidt, 1906, Math Ann, 63, 433, 10.1007/BF01449770 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.722 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.2818 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.3121 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1109/PHYCMP.1994.363696 · doi:10.1109/phycmp.1994.363696
  7. 10.1080/09500349414552301 · DOI
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevA.50.1047 · DOI
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevA.54.97 · DOI
  10. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.722 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.2818 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1103/PhysRevA.54.2675 · DOI
  13. mayers, 1998, Unconditional security in quantum cryptography
  14. hughes, 0, Quantum cryptography over underground optical fibers, proceeding of Advances in Cryptology - CRYPTO
  15. lo, 1998, Security of quantum key distribution
  16. 10.1364/AO.33.002949 · DOI
  17. 10.1103/PhysRevA.57.2379 · DOI
  18. aspect, 1986, Quantum Concepts in Space and Time, 1
  19. 10.1364/OL.21.001854 · DOI
  20. 10.1007/BF00191318 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1049/el:19930862 · DOI
  22. 10.1145/225058.225085 · DOI
  23. mayers, 1996, Quantum key distribution and string oblivious transfer in noisy channel, Advances in Cryptology Proceedings of CRYPTO'96, 1109, 343
  24. 10.1007/3-540-44750-4_10 · doi:10.1007/3-540-44750-4_10
  25. biham, 1998, Security of quantum key distribution against all collective attacks
  26. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.4034 · DOI
  27. 10.1103/PhysRevA.56.1173 · DOI
  28. 10.1103/PhysRevA.56.1163 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 381

Metadata

Authors
Mayers, D., & Yao, A.
Venue
Proceedings 39th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (Cat. No.98CB36280)
Published
2002-11-27
Pages
503-509
ISSN
0272-5428 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2170184539
Cited by
381
References
3
FWCI
4.08
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantum cryptography with imperfect apparatus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/sfcs.1998.743501
The paper
Mayers, D., & Yao, A. (2002). Quantum cryptography with imperfect apparatus. Proceedings 39th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (Cat. No.98CB36280). https://doi.org/10.1109/sfcs.1998.743501

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.