Challenges of Using Generative AI Tools in Omani Higher Education Institutions :Perceptions of Students and Academics
Abstract
The rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) technologies, such as ChatGPT, has introduced various opportunities and challenges that must be addressed for its full potential to be realized in higher education. This study investigates the challenges associated with using GenAI tools in Omani higher education institutions (HEIs) from the perspective of both students and academics. Survey data was collected from 1,749 students and 450 academics across different universities in Oman. The main findings indicate that although both groups recognize issues like logical errors, bias and misleading information, lack of citation accuracy, facilitating cheating, dependency and reduced critical thinking, academics rated challenges slightly higher across all statements, especially on concerns about over-reliance on GenAI and concerns about facilitating cheating in exams or assignments. These findings indicate a significant concern among academics and students about over-reliance on GenAI, which may potentially diminish students’ ability to think critically and creatively, and increase students’ intellectual independence on ChatGPT. Despite these reservations on GenAI use, there is a general positive attitude of both students and academics for the adoption of GenAI in the higher education context, indicating a high level of readiness among both groups to explore GenAI's potential benefits, with an acknowledgment that regulatory frameworks may be necessary to address its potential drawbacks. The study highlights the need for regulatory frameworks, comprehensive guidelines and training programs to foster the responsible and ethical integration of GenAI technologies in Omani HEIs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0 · Cited by 7,242 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…for academics in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) including profiling and prediction, assessment and evaluation, adaptive systems and personalization, and intelligent tutoring systems [12, 13] which are expected to increase teaching efficiency and enhance the quality of students learning.”
Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation
Ji, Z., Lee, N., Frieske, R., Yu, T., Su, D., Xu, Y., Ishii, E., Bang, Y. J., Madotto, A., & Fung, P. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3571730 · Cited by 5,025 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Another challenge is that GenAI tools are prone to hallucinate, producing content that is factually incorrect or inconsistent or generating incorrect citations and referencing, which can mislead users and degrade the quality of academic work for both academics and students [24, 25].”
Students' voices on generative ai: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education
Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.00290 · Cited by 2,504 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…education is becoming increasingly linked with rapid developments in new GenAI advanced applications, with the potential to revolutionize its landscape by providing innovative solutions that can enhance the quality of the teaching and learning and enhance students’ learning experience [4, 6].”
Students’ voices on generative AI: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education
Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8 · Cited by 2,301 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…education is becoming increasingly linked with rapid developments in new GenAI advanced applications, with the potential to revolutionize its landscape by providing innovative solutions that can enhance the quality of the teaching and learning and enhance students’ learning experience [4, 6].”
AI and education: guidance for policy-makers
UNESCO (2021) · doi:10.54675/pcsp7350 · Cited by 929 · see citing works
Challenges and Opportunities of Generative AI for Higher Education as Explained by ChatGPT
Michel-Villarreal, R., Vilalta-Perdomo, E., Salinas-Navarro, D. E., Thierry-Aguilera, R., & Gerardou, F. S. (2023) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci13090856 · Cited by 877 · see citing works
Engineering Education in the Era of ChatGPT: Promise and Pitfalls of Generative AI for Education
Qadir, J. (2023) · 2023 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) · doi:10.1109/educon54358.2023.10125121 · Cited by 707 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…be used to enhance students’ learning in many ways as it can provide individualized tutoring and feedback to students according to their individual learning requirements, level, and progress and can be used as conversational agent to provide explanations tailored to students' misconceptions [11].”
Artificial intelligence literacy in higher and adult education: A scoping literature review
Laupichler, M. C., Aster, A., Schirch, J., & Raupach, T. (2022) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100101 · Cited by 658 · see citing works
Chan, C. K. Y., & Lee, K. K. W. (2023) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-023-00269-3 · Cited by 634 · see citing works
Preiksaitis, C., & Rose, C. (2023) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/48785 · Cited by 468 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Another challenge is accuracy and reliability of AI-generated content and potential for students to accept it blindly [21].”
Generative Artificial Intelligence: Implications and Considerations for Higher Education Practice
Farrelly, T., & Baker, N. (2023) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci13111109 · Cited by 414 · see citing works
Hinojo-Lucena, F.-J., Aznar-Díaz, I., Cáceres-Reche, M.-P., & Romero-Rodríguez, J.-M. (2019) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci9010051 · Cited by 400 · see citing works
The AI Revolution in Education: Will AI Replace or Assist Teachers in Higher Education?
Chan, C. K. Y., & Tsi, L. H. Y. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.01185 · Cited by 387 · see citing works
Will generative AI replace teachers in higher education? A study of teacher and student perceptions
Chan, C. K. Y., & Tsi, L. H. Y. (2024) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101395 · Cited by 387 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The second most significant challenge is overreliance on GenAI technologies, which could undermine students' creativity and critical thinking skills and overall learning experience [15, 18, 19, 20].”
Yu, H., & Guo, Y. (2023) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2023.1183162 · Cited by 357 · see citing works
ChatGPT is not all you need. A state-of-the-art review of large generative AI models
Gozalo-Brizuela, R., & Garrido-Merchan, E. C. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.04655 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Xu, Z., Wijekumar, K. K., Ramı́rez, G., Hu, X., & Irey, R. C. (2019) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12758 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
A Systematic Review of Generative AI and (English Medium Instruction) Higher Education
Bannister, P., Urbieta, A. S., & Peñalver, E. A. (2023) · Aula Abierta · doi:10.17811/rifie.52.4.2023.401-409 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Masters, K. (2023) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2023.2208731 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Alshamy, A., Al-Harthi, A. S. A., & Abdullah, S. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15040501 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Self-citationThe solution lies in education: artificial intelligence & the skills gap
Chrisinger, D. (2019) · On the Horizon The International Journal of Learning Futures · doi:10.1108/oth-03-2019-096 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES OF USING ChatGPT IN THE ELT SCENARIO OF UTAS, NIZWA, OMAN
Govindarajan, R., & Christuraj, G. (2024) · Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes · doi:10.22190/jtesap230529046g · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ncube, P. D. N., Dzvapatsva, G. P., Matobobo, C., & Ranga, M. M. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-025-00871-w · Cited by 31 · see citing works
“Moreover, scholars emphasise the urgent need for policies and regulations that not only regulate the use of AI but also address critical concerns such as data pri - vacy and security [ 64, 72, 77, 81, 107].”
Pérez-Pérez, I., González-Afonso, M. C., Plasencia-Carballo, Z., & Pérez-Jorge, D. (2026) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers15020111 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“Therefore, we are entering a renewed debate on what it means to “assess” when the product (i.e., the assessable output) may be mediated by GenAI, and what conditions render such assessment legitimate [6,14].”
Alshamy, A. S., Al’Abri, K. M., Garcia, M. B., & Yousef, A. M. F. (2026) · Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching · doi:10.37074/jalt.2026.9.2.12 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Effect of Generative AI Use on Programming Self-Efficacy in Computer Engineering Students
Mutawa, A. M., Alsubaihi, S., & Sruthi, S. (2026) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Systems, and Emerging Technologies (ICAISET) · doi:10.1109/icaiset66439.2026.11542111
Afonso, M., Gonçalves, R., Santos, J., Martins, C. L., & Marreiros, G. (2026) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-32026-1_30
Pham, H. M., Nguyen, T. T. H., Nguyen, G. T. H., Vuong, N. L., & Nguyen, Q. H. V. (2026) · Journal of International Education in Business · doi:10.1108/jieb-08-2025-0114
- Authors
- Alshamy, A. S., Al-Harthi, A. S. A., & Abdullah, S.
- Affiliations
- Sultan Qaboos University (OM)
- Instructional and Learning Technologies College of Education Sultan Qaboos University,Muscat,Sultanate of Oman
- Venue
- 2025 International Conference on Smart Applications, Communications and Networking (SmartNets)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2025-07-22
- Pages
- 1-5
- OpenAlex
- W4413457591
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 5.72
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Conference on Smart Applications, Communications and Networking (SmartNets) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Keywords
- generative AI, ChatGPT, higher education, student perceptions, academic perceptions, academic integrity, cheating, overreliance on AI, critical thinking, AI dependency, algorithmic bias, AI regulation, responsible AI adoption, AI training programs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
