Cited by 31Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies3D IC and TSV technologiesElectrical and Thermal Properties of Materials

Reliability and Flexibility of Ultra-Thin Chip-on-Flex (UTCOF) Interconnects With Anisotropic Conductive Adhesive (ACA) Joints

Su-Tsai Lu, Wen-Hwa Chen·2010·IEEE Transactions on Advanced Packaging

Abstract

The need for flexible interconnects in advanced applications in consumer electronic products is increasing rapidly. The reliability and flexibility of ultra-thin chip-on-flex (UTCOF) interconnects formed using anisotropic conductive adhesive (ACA) are thus investigated. Two films of ACA materials, namely ACA-P and ACA-F, are assembled at different bonding temperatures to study the effect of temperature on the adhesion at the substrate-adhesive and adhesive-chip interfaces using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and a 90° peeling test. The contact resistance of a daisy chain with 188 input/output (I/O) is measured to examine the quality of bonding through dummy test samples with an 80-μm pitch. The reliability of the fabricated UTCOF interconnects bonded via selected ACA joints is evaluated by performing an 85°C/85% RH thermal humidity storage test (THST) for 1000 h, and their flexibility is evaluated in static bending and four-point bending tests. The interfaces between the ultra-thin silicon chip and the substrate of failed samples in the THST and four-point bending testing are then investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), which is utilized to obtain cross-sectional images. Finite element analysis is also conducted to elucidate the failure mechanism of the UTCOF interconnects in the four-point bending test. The averaged maximum allowable deflections of the fabricated UTCOF interconnects with ACA-P and ACA-F materials are 26% and 168%, respectively, higher than those of the COF interconnects with a chip thickness of 670 μm. Moreover, the contact resistance remains stable, varying by less than 10%, in the static bending test with a bending radius of 30 mm. According to the results thus obtained, give the appropriate choice of an ACA material and the optimal curing conditions, the UTCOF interconnects with ACA joints reliably serve as flexible interconnects for use in consumer electronic products.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tadvp.2010.2052806

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lu, S.-T., & Chen, W.-H.
Affiliations
National Tsing Hua University (TW)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Advanced Packaging
Published
2010-08
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
702-712
ISSN
  • 1521-3323 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9980
OpenAlex
W2118805732
Cited by
31
References
25
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Advanced Packaging (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Georgia Institute of Technology
  • Industrial Technology Research Institute
  • National Tsing Hua University
  • National Taiwan University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › 3D IC and TSV technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrical and Thermal Properties of Materials
Keywords
anisotropic conductive adhesive, flexible interconnects, interconnect reliability, bonding temperature, adhesion, contact resistance, bending flexibility, failure mechanisms, finite element analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review