Cited by 70Artificial Intelligence in EducationIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningAI in Service Interactions

“Evaluation of developing educational chatbots based on the seven principles for good teaching.”

Gonda, Donn Emmanuel, Luo, Jing, Wong, Yiu-Lun, Lei, Chi-Un·2018·2018 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE)

Abstract

The use of chatbot, in general, is gaining popularity in several sectors. However, in the education field, chatbot as a learning tool to improve the teaching is still in its infancy. The course team developed several chatbot prototypes using Agile Software Development. This study evaluated the educational appropriateness of chatbot using Chickering and Gamson's Seven Principles for Good Teaching to improve the delivery of a group assessment in higher education. Findings showed that the use of chatbot addressed five principles in enhancing the traditional course teaching.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tale.2018.8615175

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 25 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gonda, D. E., Luo, J., Wong, Y.-L., & Lei, C.-U.
Affiliations
University of Hong Kong (HK)
Venue
2018 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-12
Pages
446-453
OpenAlex
W2910726435
Cited by
70
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.91
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
Keywords
educational chatbots, chatbot evaluation, group assessment, university teaching, chatbot prototype, agile software development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review