Cited by 112Artificial Intelligence in EducationIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningAI in Service Interactions

Pedagogical AI conversational agents in higher education: a conceptual framework and survey of the state of the art

Open access
Yusuf, Habeeb, Money, Arthur, Daylamani-Zad, Damon·2025·Educational technology research and development

Abstract

The ever-changing global educational landscape, coupled with the advancement of Web3, is seeing rapid changes in the ways pedagogical artificially intelligent conversational agents are being developed and used to advance teaching and learning in higher education. Given the rapidly evolving research landscape, there is a need to establish what the current state of the art is in terms of the pedagogical applications and technological functions of these conversational agents and to identify the key existing research gaps, and future research directions, in the field. A literature survey of the state of the art of pedagogical AI conversational agents in higher education was conducted. The resulting literature sample (n = 92) was analysed using thematic template analysis, the results of which were used to develop a conceptual framework of pedagogical conversational agents in higher education. Furthermore, a survey of the state of the art was then presented as a function of the framework. The conceptual framework proposes that pedagogical AI conversational agents can primarily be considered in terms of their pedagogical applications and their pedagogical purposes , which include pastoral , instructional and cognitive , and are further considered in terms of mode of study and intent . The technological functions of the agents are also considered in terms of embodiment (embodied/disembodied) and functional type and features . This research proposes that there are numerous opportunities for future research, such as, the use of conversational agents for enhancing assessment, reflective practice and to support more effective administration and management practice. In terms of technological functions, future research would benefit from focusing on enhancing the level of personalisation and media richness of interaction that can be achieved by AI conversational agents.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This paper surveys 92 studies of pedagogical AI conversational agents in higher education and develops a conceptual framework organizing them by pedagogical applications and technological functions. It finds most agents are instructional or pastoral, mostly chatbots, with future opportunities in assessment, reflection, administration, personalisation, and media richness.

Key findings

  • The literature sample was 92 studies; pedagogical purposes were instructional (n = 41), pastoral (n = 37), and cognitive (n = 14), with modes of study split between face-to-face (n = 50) and distance education (n = 42).
  • Conversational agent intents were most commonly mentoring and coaching (n = 26), motivate and inspire (n = 17), simulate and experience (n = 15), and FAQs/knowledge base (n = 14); assessments (n = 3), admin and management (n = 3), and reflective skills/metacognitive (n = 4) were least explored.
  • Technological functions were categorized by embodiment (embodied/disembodied), functional type, and features; functional types were chatbot (n = 56), virtual human (n = 24), avatar (n = 10), and voice bot (n = 2).
  • The paper identifies future research needs in assessment, reflective practice, administration/management, and in enhancing personalisation and media richness of interaction.

Methods

  • A literature survey of the state of the art was conducted using Petersen et al. (2008) conventions, searching databases via Brunel University London’s library facility with Boolean search terms around conversational agents and pedagogy.
  • Inclusion/exclusion criteria limited studies to 2014–2022, higher education/university settings, journal or conference proceedings, and English-language, online-available primary studies.
  • The search reduced 5,170 initial results to 1,448 after duplicate removal, then 484 after abstract/publication-type screening, and finally 92 studies after full-text review; thematic template analysis was used to develop the conceptual framework.

Limitations

  • The paper states that selection, extraction, and analysis are “not an exact science” and may contain subjective research elements.
  • The paper states that only one coder was involved, so interrater reliability consideration was not required.
  • The paper states the review is limited to a pre-defined search criteria and period (2014–2022), with additional relevant studies outside the criteria considered only in the discussion; evident from the text, the search also excluded non-English and non-online-available studies.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11423-025-10447-4

Cites

123 of 123 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 44 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingcitation

    Within the categorisation label communication, the agents are all used for distance education, due to their ability to increase the level of interaction between individuals for remote education and e-learning.

    “Within the categorisation label communication, the agents are all used for distanceeducation, due to their ability to increase the level of interaction between individuals for remote education and e-learning”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    There is no existing research that surveys and categorises contemporary research studies across the full range of pedagogical AI conversational agents, specifically in the higher education landscape based on both their pedagogical and technological functions.

    “To the best of our knowledge, there is no existing research that surveys and categorises contemporary research studies across the full range of pedagogical AI conversational agents, specifically in the higher education landscape based on both, their pedagogical and technological functions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The literature search strategy and databases used were comprehensive enough to identify all relevant studies on pedagogical AI conversational agents in higher education.
  • Findingnone given

    Cognitive agents tend to be deployed as face-to-face systems.

    “In terms of mode of study, these agents tend to be deployed as face-to-face systems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingcitation

    The studies that fall in the remit of the assessment category explore a conversational agent for assessing learners work, either on an individual level or in groupwork.

    “Finally, the studies that fall in the remit of the assessment category explore a conversational agent for assessing learners work, either on an individual level or in groupwork”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    In terms of conversational agent intents, the largest category to be explored by researchers is mentoring and coaching (n = 26, 28%).

    “In terms of the conversational agent intents, the largest category to be explored by researchers is mentoring and coaching (n = 26, 28%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 67
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 72
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 5
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Within the simulate and experience label, all the conversational agents are used for face-to-face educational programmes, with the aim of providing context to education for an improved student experience.

    “Within the simulate and experience label, all the conversational agents are used for face-to-face educational programmes, with the aim of providing context to education for an improved student experience.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingnone given

    The pedagogic section of the framework presents three tiers of categorisation for the pedagogical functions of conversational agents.

    “The pedagogic section of the framework presents three tiers of categorisation for the pedagogical functions of conversational agents.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The 92 studies identified by the search strategy are representative of the state of the art of pedagogical AI conversational agents in higher education.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The first and highest level of categorisation is embodiment, in which every AI conversational agent is labelled as either embodied (some degree of visual or humanistic form) or disembodied (command line or text based, without visual form).

    “The first and highest level of categorisation is embodiment, in which every AI conversational agent is labelled as either embodied, wherein the agent has some degree of visual or humanistic form, or disembodied, in which the agent is command line or text based, without visual form.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The 92 studies identified by the search strategy are representative of the state of the art of pedagogical AI conversational agents in higher education.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The studies labelled under reflective skills and metacognitive tend to also be applied to programmes categorised as distance-education, however some studies in this domain are also applied in face-to-face contexts.

    “The studies labelled under reflective skills and metacognitive (Bhartiya et al., 2019;Chang et al., 2022;Xiao et al., 2019;Yılmaz et al., 2018) tend to also be applied to programmes categorised as distance-education, however some studies in this domain are also applied in face-to-face contexts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Studies within assessment domain tend to vary in agent type and mode of study, and is not as explored as other categorisations within the framework hence a smaller sample.

    “Studies within this domain tend to vary in agent type and mode of study, and is not as explored as other categorisations within the framework hence a smaller sample.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    AI conversational agents categorised within the pastoral domain aid educational administration tasks to reduce staff workloads and increase efficiency, or build motivation and/or self-efficacy of students.

    “The AI conversational agents categorised within the pastoral domain aid educational administration tasks to reduce staff workloads and increase efficiency, or build motivation and/or self-efficacy of students.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The 92 studies identified by the search strategy are representative of the state of the art of pedagogical AI conversational agents in higher education.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Agents in mentoring and coaching can be used in both distance-education (n = 12/26, 46%) and face-to-face education (n = 14/26, 54%).

    “agents can be used in both distance-education (n = 12/26, 46%) and face-to-face education (n = 14/26, 54%)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Studies of AI conversational agents used for instruction aid teaching and learning through instruction or via building on knowledge of core competencies.

    “Studies of AI conversational agents used for instruction aid teaching and learning through instruction or via building on knowledge of core competencies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The 92 studies identified by the search strategy are representative of the state of the art of pedagogical AI conversational agents in higher education.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The second level of categorisation, functional type, relates to the specific type of AI conversational agent design in terms of its aesthetic interface, which can be virtual human (anthropomorphic representation), avatar (embodied creature but not completely anthropomorphic or human-like), chatbot (text based communicational agent), or voice bot (audio based agent, allowing only verbal communi

    “The second level of categorisation identified as functional type relates to the specific type of AI conversational agent design, in terms of its aesthetic interface, which can be virtual human which is an anthropomorphic representation, avatar which is an embodied creature but not completely anthropomorphic or human-like, chatbot which is a text based communicational agent, or voice bot which is”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The 92 studies identified by the search strategy are representative of the state of the art of pedagogical AI conversational agents in higher education.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Within the FAQ's and knowledge base category, all conversational agents aim to increase student participation by answering student queries, and are used in both distance education and face-to-face education.

    “Within the FAQ's and knowledge base category, all conversational agents aim to increase student participation by answering student queries, and are used in both distanceeducation and face-to-face education”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    The aim of the assessment agent is to provide feedback to learners.

    “The aim of the agent is to provide feedback to learners”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    From the studies reviewed, around half of the conversational agents were used in a distance-education programme delivery and the other half were used in a face-to-face programme delivery.

    “From the studies reviewed, around half of the conversational agents were used in a distance-education programme delivery and the other half were used in a face-to-face programme delivery.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The 92 studies identified by the search strategy are representative of the state of the art of pedagogical AI conversational agents in higher education.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Cognitive AI conversational agents build the metacognitive functions of students by promoting creative thinking, facilitating experiences or reducing their psychological natural responses.

    “Finally, the cognitive AI conversational agents build the metacognitive functions of students by promoting creative thinking, facilitating experiences or reducing their psychological natural responses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The 92 studies identified by the search strategy are representative of the state of the art of pedagogical AI conversational agents in higher education.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingown data

    The characteristics of AI conversational agents were organised into two overarching themes: pedagogical applications and technological functions.

    “The characteristics of AI conversational agents were organised into two overarching themes, namely pedagogical applications and technological functions of AI conversational agents.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The 92 studies identified by the search strategy are representative of the state of the art of pedagogical AI conversational agents in higher education.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Most studies within the simulate and experience label (instructional) are used in healthcare-based education programmes, and are medical technology (MedTech) based research studies.

    “Most studies within this label are used in healthcare-based education programmes, and are medical technology (MedTech) based research studies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingnone given

    The third and lowest level of categorisation, conversational agent intents, includes eight sections: FAQ's & Knowledge Base, Motivate & Inspire, Admin & Management, Communication, Reflective Skills & Metacognitive, Simulate & Experience, Assessments, and Mentoring & Coaching.

    “(5) Reflective Skills & Metacognitive where the conversational agent promotes analytical, divergent, critical and/or creative thinking in learners' to aid learning, (6) Simulate & Experience where the conversational agent provides a platform to stimulate a particular context or role and/or the agent to interact with human emotion to some degree, for example as a patient in healthcare education, (7”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The 92 studies identified by the search strategy are representative of the state of the art of pedagogical AI conversational agents in higher education.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingnone given

    The first and highest level of categorisation, pedagogical purposes, is an overarching primary function of pedagogical application, stated as instructional, pastoral and cognitive.

    “The first and highest level of categorisation identified as pedagogical purposes is an overarching primary function of pedagogical application, stated as instructional, pastoral and cognitive.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The 92 studies identified by the search strategy are representative of the state of the art of pedagogical AI conversational agents in higher education.
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingcitation

    The majority of cognitive agents tend to have intents focused on the simulate and experience category.

    “Regarding conversational agent intents, the majority agents tend to have intents focused on the simulate and experience category”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The conversational agents within the high-level instructional category labelled as simulate and experience are also used for face-to-face educational programmes, however they are used for an instructional teaching and learning purpose to build student knowledge, as opposed to the cognitive high-level category wherein they are assisting the cognitive functions of students, such as psychological.

    “Similar to the cognitive high-level category, the conversational agents within the highlevel instructional category labelled as simulate and experience are also used for faceto-face educational programmes, however they are used for an instructional teaching and learning purpose to build student knowledge, as opposed to the cognitive high-level category wherein they are assisting the cognitive”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The third and lowest level of categorisation, features, indicates the implementation of a specific type of technology, including five sections: Machine Learning, Social/IM Link, External Data Source, Natural Language Processing (API or Native/Natural), and Custom/Unspecified Development.

    “This layer of categorisation includes five sections; (1) Machine Learning, wherein the AI conversational agent has additional learning capabilities such as eye tracking, emotion sensors, gaze detection, biometrics etc. to make the conversation more intelligent, emotionally, or otherwise, (2) Social/IM Link which uses a social media or instant messaging (IM) platform as the primary user interface,”
    • Also stated in: § Technological functions · plain
      “(4) Natural Language Processing (NLP) for understanding human language, which can have two sub-categories, firstly Application Programming Interface (API) wherein the agent connects to an external NLP system such as Facebook (Wit.ai),Python libraries, IBM Watson etc. and secondly Native/Natural NLP wherein the agent uses NLP using built-in libraries or source code, and lastly (5) Custom/Unspec”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The 92 studies identified by the search strategy are representative of the state of the art of pedagogical AI conversational agents in higher education.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In terms of conversational agent intents, the largest category to be explored by researchers is Motivate & Inspire label, wherein most conversational agents (n = 13/17, 76%) are used within face-to-face education programmes while some (n = 4/17, 23%) are used in distance-learning programmes.

    “In terms of the conversational agent intents, the largest category to be explored by researchers is Motivate & Inspire label, wherein most conversational agents (n = 13/17, 76%) are used within face-to-face education programmes while some (n = 4/17, 23%) are used in distance-learning programmes”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Face-to-face agents are generally guided by an instructor or facilitator, tend to be more diverse in embodiment and functional type, and include chatbots, virtual humans or avatars, and voice-bots.

    “The agents used for face-to-face education are generally guided by an instructor or facilitator and therefore tend to be more diverse in their embodiment and functional type, and accordingly this category can include chatbots”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The conversational agents within the high-level Pastoral category labelled as Communication are also used for distance-learning programmes, however they are used for pastoral support purposes to aid the learning process by engaging students, as opposed to the Cognitive high-level category wherein they are used as a tool for interaction between students.

    “Similar to the Cognitive high-level category, the conversational agents within the high-level Pastoral category labelled as Communication are also used for distancelearning programmes, however they are used for pastoral support purposes to aid the learning process by engaging students, as opposed to the Cognitive high-level category wherein they are used as a tool for interaction between students”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Each study acknowledges that agents can provide emotional support and foster a positive learning environment.

    “Each study acknowledges that agents can provide emotional support and foster a positive learning environment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The most common functional type of pedagogical conversational agent is the chatbot, which is mostly disembodied with text-based inputs and outputs.

    “The most common functional type of agent is the chatbot, which is sometimes embodied (Scholten et al., 2019;Xie et al., 2021) but mostly presents as a disembodied agent, having a text-based inputs and outputs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The conversational agents within the high-level Pastoral category labelled as FAQ & Knowledge Base are mostly used for distance-learning programmes (n = 9/10, 90%) to aid student learning and/or act as a student support mechanism, as opposed to the Instructional high-level category wherein they are used as a tool for increasing student participation by answering student queries.

    “Furthermore, similar to the Instructional high-level category, the conversational agents within the high-level Pastoral category labelled as FAQ & Knowledge Base are mostly used for distance-learning programmes (n = 9/10, 90%) to aid student learning and/or act as a student support mechanism, as opposed to the Instructional high-level category wherein they are used as a tool for increasing student”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Most agents within the pastoral group are labelled as distance-education, which shows a contrasting overview to the instructional group, mainly since pastoral AI conversational agents supplement and support teaching and learning as opposed to direct in-class instruction.

    “Concerning the mode of study categorisation, most agents within the pastoral group are labelled as distance-education, which shows a contrasting overview to the instructional group, mainly since pastoral AI conversational agents supplement and support teaching and learning as opposed to direct in-class instruction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingcitation

    Distance-learning agents are generally used by students in their own time and include mostly disembodied chatbots, with some embodied virtual humans.

    “The AI conversational agents used for distance-learning are generally used by students in their own time (non-scheduled) and include mostly disembodied chatbots”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    Across these studies, a common theme emerges regarding the cognitive load management facilitated by agents.

    “Across these studies, a common theme emerges regarding the cognitive load management facilitated by agents.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    Social/IM link agents tend to be disembodied chatbots that use platforms such as Telegram, WhatsApp and Facebook messenger.

    “Social/IM link tend to be disembodied chatbots that use platforms such as Telegram, WhatsApp and Facebook messenger”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Studies in educational technology tend to focus on either the pedagogical impact of their agents or the technological advancement of their agent.

    “However, studies within this remit tend to focus on either the pedagogical impact of their agents, or the technological advancement of their agent”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Virtual human conversational agents are always embodied agents and span over all three pedagogical purposes (cognitive, instructional and pastoral).

    “Virtual human conversational agents are always embodied agents and span over all three pedagogical purposes (cognitive, instructional and pastoral).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Kim and Baylor (2006) categorise roles statically, while Tao et al. (2008) advocate for a more flexible, dynamic role adaptation.

    “However, while Kim and Baylor (2006) categorise roles statically, Tao et al. (2008) advocate for a more flexible, dynamic role adaptation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The voice bot is the least popular functional type of pedagogical conversational agent and is only used within the cognitive pedagogical purpose.

    “The last and least-popular functional type of pedagogical conversational agent is the voice bot, which is only used within the cognitive pedagogical purpose (Morris & Chen, 2020, 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    The agents within the Motivate & Inspire category tend to have anthropomorphic aesthetic characteristics.

    “The agents within this category tend to have anthropomorphic aesthetic characteristics.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    There is a lack of focus on cognitive agents in general and instructional agents specifically focusing on assessment.

    “There appears to be a lack of focus on cognitive agents in general and instructional agents specifically focusing on assessment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    From the surveyed pedagogical conversational agents, some used native NLP libraries, but many linked to common and sometimes open-source NLP systems through API connections.

    “From the pedagogical conversational agents surveyed, some used native NLP libraries such as the study by Hsu et al. (2021) that uses a custom Python library, but many agents linked to common and sometimes opensource NLP systems through API connections to services such as Google's DialogFlow (Gonda & Chu, 2019), Juji.ai (Gupta & Chen, 2022), NLP.js (Winkler et al., 2020), IBM's Watson (Gonda et al.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The highest-level categorisation of the technological functions is the cyber-physical and visual embodiment of the conversational agents which, based on the thematic analysis conducted, has been classified as embodied and disembodied.

    “The highest-level categorisation of the technological functions is the cyber-physical and visual embodiment of the conversational agents which, based on the thematic analysis conducted, has been classified as embodied and disembodied.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingcitation

    Every pedagogical agent analysed within the remit of this survey can be considered within the construct of embodiment.

    “Every pedagogical agent analysed within the remit of this survey can be considered within the construct of embodiment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The majority of AI conversational agents exploit NLP capabilities and have provisions for connecting to various data sources.

    “In reference to the technological functions, the majority of AI conversational agents exploit NLP capabilities to ensure users can effectively and easily communicate with the agents and have provisions for connecting to various data sources to draw meaningful conversations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingreasoning

    There is a lack of research that focuses on the use of LLMs for pedagogical purposes.

    “Due to its recent inception, there is a lack of research that focuses on the use of LLMs for pedagogical purposes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    They highlight the need for agents to adapt to individual learners' emotional and motivational needs, suggesting that personalised interactions can lead to better educational outcomes.

    “They highlight the need for agents to adapt to individual learners' emotional and motivational needs, suggesting that personalised interactions can lead to better educational outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    All sources recognise that human-like gestures and facial expressions contribute to a more relatable and effective learning experience.

    “All sources recognise that human-like gestures and facial expressions contribute to a more relatable and effective learning experience.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingreasoning

    All these studies recognise the importance of scalability in deploying pedagogical agents across various educational settings.

    “All these studies recognise the importance of scalability in deploying pedagogical agents across various educational settings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The review highlighted the diverse applications of these agents in various educational contexts.

    “The review has highlighted the diverse applications of these agents in various educational contexts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    When comparing these studies, several shared themes emerge regarding strategic implementation in educational contexts, such as scalability and task management.

    “When comparing these studies, several shared themes emerge regarding strategic implementation in educational contexts, such as scalability and task management.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingown data

    The conceptual framework presented in the study has two overarching themes: pedagogical applications and technological functions of pedagogical AI conversational agents.

    “The conceptual framework presented in this study has two overarching themes which include the pedagogical applications, and technological functions of pedagogical AI conversational agents.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The frameworks share a common goal of enhancing educational outcomes through the strategic use of conversational agents, yet they differ in their focus areas, ranging from psychological and social dynamics to cognitive processes and technological functions.

    “The frameworks share a common goal of enhancing educational outcomes through the strategic use of conversational agents, yet they differ in their focus areas, ranging from psychological and social dynamics to cognitive processes and technological functions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The study found many disembodied chatbots having NLP capabilities, which creates an intelligent agent able to identify users' intentions from verbal cues in natural language.

    “this study has found many disembodied chatbots having NLP capabilities, which creates an intelligent agent, as the agent is able to identify users' intentions from verbal cues in natural language.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Of the 92 studies, 50 were conducted in face-to-face mode and 42 in distance education mode.

    “Face-to-face | 50”
    • Also stated in: § Conclusions · plain
      “Distance | 42”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Of the 92 studies, the pedagogical purposes were cognitive (14), pastoral (37), and instructional (41).

    “Cognitive | 14”
    • Also stated in: § Conclusions · plain
      “Pastoral | 37”
    • Also stated in: § Conclusions · plain
      “Instructional | 41”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The technological functions of AI conversational agents were found to be either embodied or disembodied, and to belong to one of four functional types (virtual human, avatar, chatbot, or voice bot), and to have one or more of five technological functions (machine learning, natural language processing, external data source, social and instant messaging link, or custom and/or unspecified development

    “The technological functions of AI conversational agents were found to be either embodied or disembodied, and belong to one of four functional types; (1) virtual human, (2) avatar, (3) chatbot or (4) voice bot, and to have one (or more) of five technological functions; (1) machine learning, (2) natural language processing, 3) external data source, (4) social and instant messaging link or (5) custom”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Each framework addresses task coordination uniquely, contributing to an understanding of how agents support instructional goals.

    “Each framework addresses task coordination uniquely, contributing to an understanding of how agents support instructional goals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    The conversational agents that exploit natural language processing systems also fall into one of two sub-types: native and natural or application programming interface systems.

    “The conversational agents that exploit natural language processing systems also fall into one of two sub-types; native and natural or application programming interface systems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Pedagogical applications of AI conversational agents were found to belong to one of three pedagogical purposes (pastoral, instructional, or cognitive) and to specify into one of two modes of study (face-to-face or distance-education).

    “Pedagogical applications of AI conversational agents were found to belong to one of three pedagogical purposes; (1) pastoral, (2) instructional or (3) cognitive, and specify into one of two modes of study, face-to-face or distance-education.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Studies of conversational agents used for Instruction aid teaching and learning through instruction or via building on knowledge of core competencies.

    “Studies of conversational agents used for Instruction aid teaching and learning through instruction or via building on knowledge of core competencies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Anomalies and irregularities in the thematic analysis were rectified through validation, ensuring all studies in the literature dataset found a home in each thematic layer, arriving at a consensus pool of overarching themes and sub-themes.

    “Any anomalies found (such as where a study would not be identified within a set a theme) or other irregularities and inconsistencies were rectified through validation, which ensured that all the studies in the literature dataset found a home in each of the thematic layers, finally arriving at a consensus pool of overarching themes and sub-themes that set the foundation on which the findings of”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Pedagogical applications and technological functions complement each other, as increased technological functions can enable a wider range of pedagogical applications, and more specified pedagogical applications often require more specialised technological functions.

    “Both of these overarching themes complement each other, as increased technological functions can enable a wider range of pedagogical applications, and more specified pedagogical applications often require more specialised technological functions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The 92 studies identified by the search strategy are representative of the state of the art of pedagogical AI conversational agents in higher education.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    The review process was partially conducted based on the conventions and guidelines applied by Petersen et al. (2008).

    “The review process of this study is partially conducted based on the conventions and guidelines applied by Petersen et al. (2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Petersen et al. (2008)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    The technological functions of pedagogical AI conversational agents can be considered in terms of embodiment (embodied/disembodied) and functional type and features.

    “The technological functions of the agents are also considered in terms of embodiment (embodied/disembodied) and functional type and features.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The 92 studies identified by the search strategy are representative of the state of the art of pedagogical AI conversational agents in higher education.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Conversational agents have been demonstrated to supplement and advance education in various forms, such as providing assessment of learners' work, increasing peer dialogue, providing a context for education (e.g., role-play in healthcare education), and answering student queries.

    “Conversational agents have been demonstrated to supplement and advance education in various forms, such as providing assessment of learners work (Maryadi et al., 2017), increasing peer dialogue (Wang et al., 2020), providing a context for education, for example in coordinating role-play in healthcare education (Shorey et al., 2019), and answering student queries (Gonda & Chu, 2019).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Maryadi et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Wang et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Shorey et al., 2019 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Pedagogical AI conversational agents can primarily be considered in terms of their pedagogical applications and pedagogical purposes, which include pastoral, instructional and cognitive, and are further considered in terms of mode of study and intent.

    “The conceptual framework proposes that pedagogical AI conversational agents can primarily be considered in terms of their pedagogical applications and their pedagogical purposes, which include pastoral, instructional and cognitive, and are further considered in terms of mode of study and intent.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The 92 studies identified by the search strategy are representative of the state of the art of pedagogical AI conversational agents in higher education.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Due to the recent global Covid-19 pandemic in 2020, distance education has significantly increased in many higher educational institutes and has become the normal standard.

    “According to Yarmak et al. (2021), due to the recent global Covid-19 pandemic in 2020, distance education has significantly increased in many higher educational institutes (HEI) and has become the normal standard”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Yarmak et al. (2021)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The databases selected for the survey are the most relevant sources for computer-related studies.

    “The databases selected for the survey are presented in Table 1, and were selected as they are the most relevant sources for computer-related studies (Dyba et al., 2007;Kitchenham & Charters, 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Dyba et al., 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Kitchenham & Charters, 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    There was only one coder involved in the thematic analysis, and therefore interrater reliability consideration was not required.

    “There was only one coder involved in the process and therefore interrater reliability consideration was not required.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Pastoral agents aid educational administration tasks to reduce workloads and increase efficiency or build motivation and/or self-efficacy of students.

    “The conversational agents categorised within the Pastoral domain aid educational administration tasks to reduce workloads and increase efficiency or build motivation and/or self-efficacy of students.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Although studies relate to aiding programmes in either of the two modes of delivery, the findings of the studies can be intermingled as the benefit of the experiments are not limited to the mode in which they are placed.

    “Furthermore, although studies relate to aiding programmes in either of the two modes of delivery, the findings of the studies can be intermingled as the benefit of the experiments are not limited to the mode in which they are placed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The selection, extraction, and analysis processes are not an exact science, and the results may have elements of subjective research.

    “It must be noted that the selection, extraction, and analysis processes are not an exact science as there are no absolute rules, nor container in the proposed research domain to follow or adhere to, hence the results may have elements of subjective research.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Cognitive agents build the metacognitive functions of the students by promoting creative thinking, giving experiences or reducing the psychological natural responses.

    “Cognitive agents build the metacognitive functions of the students by promoting creative thinking, giving experiences or reducing the psychological natural responses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Marín (2014) introduces a social dimension, suggesting that emotional and social aspects are as crucial as cognitive support in the learning process.

    “Marín (2014) introduces a social dimension, suggesting that emotional and social aspects are as crucial as cognitive support in the learning process.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Marín (2014)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Tao et al. (2008) propose a framework that integrates psychological incentive mechanisms, suggesting that Expert, Mentor, and Motivator agents stimulate learners' internal motivation.

    “Tao et al. (2008) propose a framework that integrates psychological incentive mechanisms, suggesting that Expert, Mentor, and Motivator agents stimulate learners' internal motivation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tao et al. (2008)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Within developed countries, education-focused applications appear to be slower in adopting the latest advancements in digital transformation technologies and gaining investment in cutting-edge technologies compared to sectors such as finance and pharma.

    “Within developed countries, and especially in a post-Covid United Kingdom, education focused applications appear to be slower in adopting the latest advancements in digital transformation technologies and gaining investment in cutting-edge technologies, while sectors such as finance and pharma appear to benefit more from public sector investment”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Bell, 2023

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Hacker & Dreifus, 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Johnson et al., 2023

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Zhao et al. (2014) emphasise agents' ability to adapt to learners' emotional states, noting that timely feedback can enhance learner motivation.

    “Zhao et al. (2014) emphasise agents' ability to adapt to learners' emotional states, noting that timely feedback can enhance learner motivation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zhao et al. (2014)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Their contribution lies in emphasising scalability, allowing pedagogical agents to operate across various educational contexts and disciplines.

    “Their contribution lies in emphasising scalability, allowing pedagogical agents to operate across various educational contexts and disciplines.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Nakano et al. (2008)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Disembodied conversational agents generally lack bodily form and thus, are centred on a text-based graphical user interface.

    “Disembodied conversational agents generally lack bodily form and thus, are centred on a text-based graphical user interface.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Marín (2014) emphasises agents' roles in fostering social interaction and emotional support, suggesting that virtual peer interactions contribute to empathy and social equality among learners, thereby improving learning outcomes.

    “Marín (2014) emphasises agents' roles in fostering social interaction and emotional support, suggesting that virtual peer interactions contribute to empathy and social equality among learners, thereby improving learning outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Marín (2014)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Fakinlede et al. (2013) highlight agents as virtual companions, not only providing academic support but also fostering positive learning environments that mitigate isolation.

    “Fakinlede et al. (2013) highlight agents as virtual companions, not only providing academic support but also fostering positive learning environments that mitigate isolation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fakinlede et al. (2013)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Moreno (2004) focuses on cognitive processing, proposing that agents aid in organising learning materials and managing cognitive load.

    “Moreno (2004) focuses on cognitive processing, proposing that agents aid in organising learning materials and managing cognitive load.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Moreno (2004)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    This research has adopted the view stipulated by Ziemke (2023) which posits that embodied conversational agents have 'organismic' and physical attributes which make them anthropomorphic based on their visual aesthetic and/or ability of interaction with users.

    “This research has adopted the view stipulated by Ziemke (2023) which posits that embodied conversational agents have”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ziemke (2023)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Mayer and DaPra (2012) integrate social agency, arguing that agents can enhance comprehension through rapport-building, while Zhao et al. (2014) highlight the adaptability of agents in providing personalised support.

    “Mayer and DaPra (2012) integrate social agency, arguing that agents can enhance comprehension through rapport-building, while Zhao et al. (2014) highlight the adaptability of agents in providing personalised support.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Mayer and DaPra (2012)

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Zhao et al. (2014)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Disembodied conversational agents are more common in pedagogical contexts due to being easier to develop, requiring less visual programming expertise and computational power for rendering media outputs.

    “Such conversational agents are more common in pedagogical contexts due to being easier to develop, requiring less visual programming expertise and computational power for rendering media outputs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Kim and Baylor (2006) classify pedagogical agents into three roles: Expert, Mentor, and Motivator.

    “Kim and Baylor (2006) classify pedagogical agents into three roles: Expert, Mentor, and Motivator.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kim and Baylor (2006)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    The use of LLMs is likely to become much more common in light of new vendors developing AI conversational agents using this approach.

    “The use of LLMs is likely to become much more common in light of new vendors developing AI conversational agents using this approach (Dilmegani, 2023).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Dilmegani, 2023

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Lemon et al. (2002) highlights natural language processing capabilities as crucial for creating an immersive learning environment.

    “Lemon et al. (2002) highlights natural language processing capabilities as crucial for creating an immersive learning environment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lemon et al. (2002)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Komatani et al. (2006) emphasise multi-threaded dialogue management, showing how agents' ability to manage multiple conversation threads enhances user engagement.

    “Komatani et al. (2006) emphasise multi-threaded dialogue management, showing how agents' ability to manage multiple conversation threads enhances user engagement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Komatani et al. (2006)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Large language models (LLMs) are a rapidly emerging technology for the development of AI conversational agents.

    “One rapidly emerging technology is the use of large language models (LLMs) for the development of AI conversational agents.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Min et al. (2019) and Mayer and DaPra (2012) discuss embodiment, with findings indicating that human-like gestures improve interaction quality and foster social presence.

    “Min et al. (2019) and Mayer and DaPra (2012) discuss embodiment, with findings indicating that human-like gestures improve interaction quality and foster social presence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Min et al. (2019)

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Mayer and DaPra (2012)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Tao et al. (2008) propose that agents should switch flexibly among roles such as knowledge provider, emotional stimulator, and organiser to better meet diverse student needs.

    “Tao et al. (2008) propose that agents should switch flexibly among roles such as knowledge provider, emotional stimulator, and organiser to better meet diverse student needs, enhancing adaptability in learning contexts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tao et al. (2008)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Voice bots have limitations such as lack of visual engagement and dependence on a singular human sense, which makes them less inclusive in terms of actual use.

    “It is not explored due to the various and obvious limitations of the voice bot, such as lack of visual engagement and dependence on a singular human sense, which also makes it less inclusive in terms of actual use.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Students consistently need to reflect on their knowledge, methods of learning and revision techniques to build better memory retention, gain a better understanding of their subject matter, and avoid unconscious biases from directing their critical judgement through implicit assumptions.

    “Students consistently need to reflect on their knowledge, methods of learning and revision techniques to build better memory retention, gain a better understanding of their subject matter, and avoid unconscious biases from directing their critical judgement through implicit assumptions (Brookfield, 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Brookfield, 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Lemon et al. (2002) focus on adaptable dialogue systems, and Marín (2014) provides structured role definitions across educational contexts.

    “As previously discussed, Lemon et al. (2002) focus on adaptable dialogue systems, and Marín (2014) provides structured role definitions across educational contexts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Lemon et al. (2002)

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Marín (2014)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Academic and faculty staff satisfaction in higher education is an area of interest for universities as it is linked to staff effectiveness and retainment.

    “Academic and faculty staff satisfaction in higher education is an area of interest for universities as it is linked to staff effectiveness and retainment (Gillespie et al., 2001).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gillespie et al., 2001 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Reflections are an important tool for the teacher or instructor, as reflective practice allows progress in pedagogical ability by reflecting on sessions and identifying areas of weakness and implementing perpetual improvements.

    “reflections are also an important tool for the teacher or instructor, as reflective practice allows progress in pedagogical ability, by reflecting on sessions and identifying areas of weakness and implementing perpetual improvements, consistently (Tay et al., 2023).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tay et al., 2023

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The literature review and conceptual framework demonstrated the growing trend and potential benefits of using AI conversational agents for pedagogical purposes in higher education.

    “this literature review and conceptual framework has demonstrated the growing trend and potential benefits of using AI conversational agents for pedagogical purposes in higher education.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Student satisfaction is a key performance indicator for universities, and in many countries such as the UK, institutions have a legal responsibility to declare student satisfaction results to regulatory bodies, and student satisfaction also affects legalities related to student-university relationship in contract law.

    “Student satisfaction is a key performance indicator for universities, and in many countries such as the UK, institutions have a legal responsibility to declare student satisfaction results to regulatory bodies, and student satisfaction also affects legalities related to student-university relationship in contract law (Gaffney-Rhys & Jones, 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gaffney-Rhys & Jones, 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In many higher education institutes, teaching and faculty staff employ considerable time on assessment and feedback but have very little professional development in how to design assessments.

    “In many higher education institutes, teaching and faculty staff employ considerable time on assessment and feedback,”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites McConlogue, 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Reflection is a crucial aspect of learning, especially in higher education.

    “Another crucial aspect of learning is reflection, especially in higher education (Harvey et al., 2016;Moon, 2004).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Harvey et al., 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Moon, 2004

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Assessment processes are one of the most cited factors linked to causing student stress and anxiety in higher education.

    “assessment processes are one of the most cited factors linked to causing student stress and anxiety in higher education (McConlogue, 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites McConlogue, 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The conceptual framework developed in this study provides a comprehensive understanding of the key components and design principles of pedagogical AI conversational agents and offers a useful framework for future research and development in this field.

    “The conceptual framework developed in this study provides a comprehensive understanding of the key components and design principles of pedagogical AI conversational agents and offers a useful framework for future research and development in this field.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The conceptual framework developed in the current study distinguishes itself from frameworks in the wider literature by offering a comprehensive approach that integrates both pedagogical applications and technological considerations, making it particularly suited to the complexities of higher education.

    “The conceptual framework developed in the current study distinguishes itself from frameworks presented in the wider literature to date by offering a comprehensive approach that integrates both pedagogical applications and technological considerations, making it particularly suited to the complexities of higher education.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    A cause of stress and burnout is not necessarily having a high number of students, but rather the lack of management tools available to handle a high number of students.

    “When analysed, it is apparent that a cause of stress and burnout is not necessarily having a high number of students, but rather the lack of management tools available to handle a high number of students.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A major factor in faculty staff dissatisfaction is occupational stress, a primary cause of which is exposure to high numbers of students, especially tuition of postgraduates, which strongly predicts the experience of burnout.

    “A major factor in faculty staff dissatisfaction is occupational stress, a primary cause of which is”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Watts & Robertson, 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The conceptual framework developed in the current study builds upon and extends existing frameworks by providing a comprehensive categorisation of pedagogical conversational agents that integrates both pedagogical applications and technological functions.

    “the conceptual framework developed in the current study builds upon, and extends existing frameworks, by providing a comprehensive categorisation of pedagogical conversational agents that integrates both pedagogical applications and technological functions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Many pedagogical instructional theories are based on the process of reflection, for instance Experiential Learning Theory which posits that learning happens through experimentation, reflection, thought and action.

    “Many pedagogical instructional theories are based on the process of reflection, for instance Experiential Learning Theory which posits that learning happens through experimentation, reflection, thought and action (Kolb, 1984).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kolb, 1984

      Not checked in the free run.

104 of 104
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 92 studies identified by the search strategy are representative of the state of the art of pedagogical AI conversational agents in higher education.

    “The resulting literature sample (n = 92) was analysed using thematic template analysis”
    “only 92 studies remained”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The literature search strategy and databases used were comprehensive enough to identify all relevant studies on pedagogical AI conversational agents in higher education.

    “To the best of our knowledge, there is no existing research that surveys and categorises contemporary research studies across the full range of pedagogical AI conversational agents, specifically in the higher education landscape based on both, their pedagogical and technological functions.”
    “The databases selected for the survey are presented in Table 1, and were selected as they are the most relevant sources for computer-related studies (Dyba et al., 2007;Kitchenham & Charters, 2007).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Assessment processes directly lead to grades, results, and degree classifications, which can have significant impacts on student progression, retainment, graduate destinations and in some cases on teacher reputation.

    “assessment processes directly lead to grades, results, and degree classifications, which can have significant impacts on student progression, retainment, graduate destinations and in some cases on teacher reputation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The ability to manage the learning journey appropriately, with clear communication between the faculty department and the student, impacts on student satisfaction.

    “the ability to manage the learning journey appropriately, with clear communication between the faculty department and the student also impacts on student satisfaction.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Aside from VLEs such as Moodle, Blackboard, Teams and otherwise, the use of technological tools to manage students in terms of learning progression, educational journey recording, student-teacher communication, requests for help and logistical variables are scarce.

    “Aside from VLE's such as Moodle, Blackboard, Teams and otherwise, the use of technological tools to manage students in terms of learning progression, educational journey recording, student-teacher communication, requests for help and logistical variables are scarce.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Technological innovations within the area of reflection are not widespread.

    “technological innovations within this area are not widespread”
6 of 6

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • With GenAI, the unit of analysis shifts from the isolated learner to human-AI ensembles, calling for role taxonomies that move beyond tool/teammate labels to account for co-regulation and distributed cognition.

    “With GenAI, the unit of analysis shifts from the isolated learner to human-AI ensembles, calling for role taxonomies that move beyond tool/teammate labels to account for co-regulation and distributed cognition [53].”

    From A Systematic Review of Generative AI in K–12: Mapping Goals, Activities, Roles, and Outcomes via the 3P Model (2025) · cites this paper as [53]

    The “Role-based functions and educational support models” section (page unavailable) proposes a broader, adaptable taxonomy of pedagogical-agent roles, including pastoral, instructional, and cognitive support. It does not say that GenAI shifts the unit of analysis to human–AI ensembles, or frame the taxonomy in terms of co-regulation and distributed cognition. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Shorey et al. is treated as a virtual human but tabulated as an avatar

    Minor

    In the discussion of virtual human agents, Shorey et al. (2019) is given as an example of one linked to an external NLP system. Table 6 instead assigns that study the functional type "Av" (avatar).

  • Scholten et al. is called a chatbot but tabulated as an avatar

    Minor

    The text cites Scholten et al. (2019) as an example of an embodied chatbot, while Table 6 assigns it the functional type "Av" (avatar).

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Bell, A. (2023). Core connectivity: The key enabler of digital transformation Neos Networks. Neos Networks.
  2. Bickmore, T., Trinh, H., Hoppmann, M., & Asadi, R. (2016). Virtual agents in the classroom: Experience fielding a co-presenter agent in University courses. Intelligent Virtual Agents (pp. 154–163). Springer International Publishing. · DOI
  3. Brookfield, S. D. (2021). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Wiley.
  4. Chang, C.-Y., Kuo, S.-Y., & Hwang, G.-H. (2021). Chatbot-facilitated nursing education: Incorporating a knowledge-based chatbot system into a nursing training program. Educational Technology & Society, 25(1), 15–27.
  5. Dibitonto, M., Leszczynska, K., Tazzi, F., & Medaglia, C. M. (2018). Chatbot in a campus environment: Design of LiSA, a virtual assistant to help students in their university life. Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 103–116). Springer International Publishing.
  6. Feng, D., Jeong, D. C., Krämer, N. C., Miller, L. C., & Marsella, S. (2017). "Is It Just Me?": Evaluating attribution of negative feedback as a function of virtual instructor's gender and proxemics. AAMAS '17: Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, Brazil.
  7. Gupta, S., & Chen, Y. (2022). Supporting inclusive learning using chatbots? A chatbot-led interview study. Journal of Information Systems Education and Information Technologies, 33(1), 98–108.
  8. Hacker, P., Engel, A., & List, T. (2023). Understanding and regulating ChatGPT, and other large generative AI models. Verfassungsblog, 2366–7044. https://doaj-org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/article/dd299f24915c4f6b8138f1c58647eb8f
  9. Hacker, A., & Dreifus, C. (2017). Higher education?: How colleges are wasting our money and failing our kids—and what we can do about it-AKA STRATEGY. Times books.
  10. Higher Education Statistics Agency. (2022). Higher education student statistics: UK, 2017/18-Student numbers and characteristics. HESA.
  11. Kitchenham, B. A., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. https://www.elsevier.com/__data/promis_misc/525444systematicreviewsguide.pdf
  12. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.
  13. Komatani, K., Kanda, N., Nakano, M., Nakadai, K., Tsujino, H., Ogata, T., & Okuno, H. G. (2006). Multi-domain spoken dialogue system with extensibility and robustness against speech recognition errors. In J. Alexandersson & A. Knott (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th SIGdial workshop on discourse and dialogue Sydney. Association for computational linguistics.
  14. Lowe, R., Pow, N., Serban, I. V., & Pineau, J. (2016). The Ubuntu dialogue corpus: A large dataset for research inunstructured multi-turn dialogue systems. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1506.08909 · DOI
  15. Marín, D. P. (2014). 5 future trends (I): Pedagogical conversational agents. In K. Jasmin (Ed.), Information and communications technology (pp. 142–161). De Gruyter Open Poland.
  16. McConlogue, T. (2020). Assessment and feedback in higher education: A guide for teachers. London: UCL Press. · DOI
  17. Min, W., Park, K., Wiggins, J., Mott, B., Wiebe, E., Boyer, K. E., & Lester, J. (2019). Predicting dialogue breakdown in conversational pedagogical agents with multimodal LSTMs. In S. Isotani, E. Millán, A. Ogan, P. Hastings, B. McLaren, & R. Luckin (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Education. Springer.
  18. Modrzejewski, M., & Rokita, P. (2018). Critical analysis of conversational agent technology for intelligent customer Support and proposition of a new solution. Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing (pp. 723–733). Cham: Springer International Publishing. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Moon, J. A. (2004). A handbook of reflective and experiential learning: Theory and practice. Hoboken: RoutledgeFalmer.
  20. Moreno, R. (2004). Animated pedagogical agents in educational technology. Educational Technology, 44(6), 23–30.
  21. Rodrigues, C., Reis, A., Pereira, R., Martins, P., Sousa, J., & Pinto, T. (2022). A review of conversational agents in education technology and innovation in learning teaching and education. Springer.
  22. Zhao, R., Papangelis, A., & Cassell, J. (2014). Towards a dyadic computational model of rapport management for human-virtual agent interaction. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 514–527). International Publishing.
  23. Ziemke, T. (2023). Disentangling notions of embodiment. Workshop on Developmental Embodied Cognition, https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Disentangling-Notions-of-Embodiment-Ziemke/a3fb41f1b3591469775b4fd50944e887b975fbd8

Authors
Yusuf, H., Money, A., & Daylamani-Zad, D.
Affiliations
Brunel University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Yusuf, Habeeb
  • Money, Arthur
  • Daylamani-Zad, Damon
Venue
Educational technology research and development
Published
2025-01-15
Volume
73
Issue
2
Pages
815-874
ISSN
  • 1042-1629 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-6501
OpenAlex
W4406423087
Cited by
112
References
123
Citations by year
2026: 76 · 2025: 36
FWCI
116.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Educational Technology Research and Development (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
Keywords
AI chatbots in education, higher education, conceptual framework, pastoral support, pedagogical support, cognitive support, personalization, media richness, assessment, reflective practice, Web3, research gaps

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review