Pedagogical AI conversational agents in higher education: a conceptual framework and survey of the state of the art
Open accessAbstract
The ever-changing global educational landscape, coupled with the advancement of Web3, is seeing rapid changes in the ways pedagogical artificially intelligent conversational agents are being developed and used to advance teaching and learning in higher education. Given the rapidly evolving research landscape, there is a need to establish what the current state of the art is in terms of the pedagogical applications and technological functions of these conversational agents and to identify the key existing research gaps, and future research directions, in the field. A literature survey of the state of the art of pedagogical AI conversational agents in higher education was conducted. The resulting literature sample (n = 92) was analysed using thematic template analysis, the results of which were used to develop a conceptual framework of pedagogical conversational agents in higher education. Furthermore, a survey of the state of the art was then presented as a function of the framework. The conceptual framework proposes that pedagogical AI conversational agents can primarily be considered in terms of their pedagogical applications and their pedagogical purposes , which include pastoral , instructional and cognitive , and are further considered in terms of mode of study and intent . The technological functions of the agents are also considered in terms of embodiment (embodied/disembodied) and functional type and features . This research proposes that there are numerous opportunities for future research, such as, the use of conversational agents for enhancing assessment, reflective practice and to support more effective administration and management practice. In terms of technological functions, future research would benefit from focusing on enhancing the level of personalisation and media richness of interaction that can be achieved by AI conversational agents.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This paper surveys 92 studies of pedagogical AI conversational agents in higher education and develops a conceptual framework organizing them by pedagogical applications and technological functions. It finds most agents are instructional or pastoral, mostly chatbots, with future opportunities in assessment, reflection, administration, personalisation, and media richness.
Key findings
- The literature sample was 92 studies; pedagogical purposes were instructional (n = 41), pastoral (n = 37), and cognitive (n = 14), with modes of study split between face-to-face (n = 50) and distance education (n = 42).
- Conversational agent intents were most commonly mentoring and coaching (n = 26), motivate and inspire (n = 17), simulate and experience (n = 15), and FAQs/knowledge base (n = 14); assessments (n = 3), admin and management (n = 3), and reflective skills/metacognitive (n = 4) were least explored.
- Technological functions were categorized by embodiment (embodied/disembodied), functional type, and features; functional types were chatbot (n = 56), virtual human (n = 24), avatar (n = 10), and voice bot (n = 2).
- The paper identifies future research needs in assessment, reflective practice, administration/management, and in enhancing personalisation and media richness of interaction.
Methods
- A literature survey of the state of the art was conducted using Petersen et al. (2008) conventions, searching databases via Brunel University London’s library facility with Boolean search terms around conversational agents and pedagogy.
- Inclusion/exclusion criteria limited studies to 2014–2022, higher education/university settings, journal or conference proceedings, and English-language, online-available primary studies.
- The search reduced 5,170 initial results to 1,448 after duplicate removal, then 484 after abstract/publication-type screening, and finally 92 studies after full-text review; thematic template analysis was used to develop the conceptual framework.
Limitations
- The paper states that selection, extraction, and analysis are “not an exact science” and may contain subjective research elements.
- The paper states that only one coder was involved, so interrater reliability consideration was not required.
- The paper states the review is limited to a pre-defined search criteria and period (2014–2022), with additional relevant studies outside the criteria considered only in the discussion; evident from the text, the search also excluded non-English and non-online-available studies.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 44 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingcitation
Within the categorisation label communication, the agents are all used for distance education, due to their ability to increase the level of interaction between individuals for remote education and e-learning.
“Within the categorisation label communication, the agents are all used for distanceeducation, due to their ability to increase the level of interaction between individuals for remote education and e-learning”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
There is no existing research that surveys and categorises contemporary research studies across the full range of pedagogical AI conversational agents, specifically in the higher education landscape based on both their pedagogical and technological functions.
“To the best of our knowledge, there is no existing research that surveys and categorises contemporary research studies across the full range of pedagogical AI conversational agents, specifically in the higher education landscape based on both, their pedagogical and technological functions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The literature search strategy and databases used were comprehensive enough to identify all relevant studies on pedagogical AI conversational agents in higher education.
- Findingnone given
Cognitive agents tend to be deployed as face-to-face systems.
“In terms of mode of study, these agents tend to be deployed as face-to-face systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
The studies that fall in the remit of the assessment category explore a conversational agent for assessing learners work, either on an individual level or in groupwork.
“Finally, the studies that fall in the remit of the assessment category explore a conversational agent for assessing learners work, either on an individual level or in groupwork”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In terms of conversational agent intents, the largest category to be explored by researchers is mentoring and coaching (n = 26, 28%).
“In terms of the conversational agent intents, the largest category to be explored by researchers is mentoring and coaching (n = 26, 28%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingreasoning
The primary aim of the studies under the communication label is to promote participation and/or interaction of students through engagement with the conversational agent.
“The primary aim of the studies under the communication label is to promote participation and/or interaction of students through engagement with the conversational agent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
All the studies within mentoring and coaching aim to provide teaching and learning to some degree, either by direct instruction, aid in mentoring/coaching or encouraging students to explore topics.
“All the studies within this area aim to provide teaching and learning to some degree, either by direct instruction, aid in mentoring/coaching or encouraging students to explore topics”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Each study in the literature dataset related to an AI conversational agent being used to aid a programme of study delivered by distance-education (online, self-study, e-learning) or face-to-face education (in-person classroom or theatre).
“Upon a review of the studies in the literature dataset, it was evident that each study related to an AI conversational agent being used to aid a programme of study which is delivered by distance-education, which includes online, self-study and e-learning delivery modes, or face-to-face education, which includes in-person delivery within a classroom or theatre.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The 92 studies identified by the search strategy are representative of the state of the art of pedagogical AI conversational agents in higher education.
- Findingreasoning
The majority of instructional studies are categorised as face-to-face.
“Regarding the mode of study, the majority of studied are categorised as face-to-face which could be due to the nature of instruction in traditional HEI's.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Within instructional and pastoral domains, the majority of AI conversational agents focus on providing knowledge to students, building student motivation and engagement, or answering student queries.
“Within these instructional and pastoral domains, the majority of AI conversational agents focus on providing knowledge to students, building student motivation and engagement, or answering student queries.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
From the survey conducted as part of this research, the types of conversational agents identified include virtual humans, avatars, chatbots and voice bots.
“From the survey conducted as part of this research, the types of conversational agents identified include virtual humans, avatars, chatbots and voice bots”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Conversational agents within the Admin & Management category have been used for both face-to-face and distance-education programmes for the purpose of administering or managing the education process.
“Conversational agents within the Admin & Management category have been used for both face-to-face and distance-education programmes for the purpose of administering or managing the education process”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Across these studies, there is a shared recognition of the importance of motivation and social rapport in learning.
“Across these studies, there is a shared recognition of the importance of motivation and social rapport in learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Most virtual human agents are developed using powerful graphical rendering software and then linked to an algorithmic programming sequence to enable conversation.
“Most virtual human agents are developed using powerful graphical rendering software such as iClone, Unity, Unreal, Media Semantics, Flash etc. which is common in video game development, and then linked to an algorithmic programming sequence to enable conversation, such as in Node.js (Ayedoun et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Many AI conversational agents (n = 37) are used for pastoral purposes.
“Furthermore, many AI conversational agents (n = 37) are used for pastoral purposes, which support educational providers in teaching and learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Across these studies, a shared theme is the emphasis on embodiment as essential for enhancing user engagement and interaction quality.
“Across these studies, a shared theme is the emphasis on embodiment as essential for enhancing user engagement and interaction quality.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Avatar agents span over all three pedagogical purposes.
“Avatar agents also span over all three pedagogical purposes and make use of stop motion animation tools”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The trend in pedagogical AI conversational agents focuses on the development of instructional and pastoral applications, specifically using disembodied chatbots.
“the trend appears to focus on the development of instructional and pastoral applications, specifically using disembodied chatbots.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The largest proportion (n = 41) of AI conversational agents used in higher education are used for instructional purposes.
“the largest proportion (n = 41) of agents used to advance teacher and/or learning within higher education are used for instructional (direct teaching) purposes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
All the agents used within the Motivate & Inspire studies aim to build the level of motivation and self-efficacy of students by inspiring and/or prompting them to learn, participate and engage in some form of educational activity.
“All the agents used within the studies aim to build the level of motivation and self-efficacy of students by inspiring and/ or prompting them to learn, participate and engage in some form of educational activity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Some virtual human agents are linked to external NLP systems via APIs to create advanced communicative dialogue.
“Some are then then linked to external NLP systems via API's such as DialogFlow (Shorey et al., 2019) to create advanced communicative dialogue.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
The studies recognise that agents can help reduce extraneous cognitive load, allowing learners to focus on essential content.
“The studies recognise that agents can help reduce extraneous cognitive load, allowing learners to focus on essential content.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Beyond NLP, the majority of the conversational agents do not have further intelligent abilities or emotional awareness.
“beyond NLP, the majority of the conversational agents do not have further intelligent abilities or emotional awareness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The agents were found to belong to one of eight sub-types: mentoring and coaching, assessments, simulate and experience, reflective skills and metacognitive, communication, administration and management, motivate and inspire, or FAQ's and knowledge base.
“The agents were also found to belong to one of eight sub-types; (1) mentoring and coaching, (2) assessments, (3) simulate and experience, (4) reflective skills and metacognitive, (5) communication, (6) administration and management, (7) motivate and inspire, or (8) FAQ's and knowledge base.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The comparison of frameworks reveals both similarities and differences between existing knowledge and the conceptual framework developed in the current study.
“The comparison of these frameworks reveals both similarities and differences between existing knowledge and the conceptual framework developed in the current study, highlighting the diverse approaches to categorising and understanding pedagogical conversational agents.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The research found very few agents designed to promote or encourage students to use reflective thinking.
“this research has found very few agents designed to promote or encourage students to use reflective thinking.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The results of the study indicate that very few conversational agents have been designed to aid and support the management of education.
“the results of this study indicate that very few conversational agents have been designed to aid and support the management of education.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The research found very few agents designed to support, automate, or strengthen assessment processes.
“this research has found very few agents are designed to support, automate, or strengthen assessment processes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The survey included 92 studies.
“n = 92”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The literature sample analysed in this study consisted of 92 studies.
“The resulting literature sample (n = 92) was analysed using thematic template analysis”
- Also stated in: § Literature search strategy · plain
“only 92 studies remained”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Literature search strategy · plain
- Interpretationcitation
The lack of a humanoid figure does not necessarily mean lack of emotional intelligence in the agent.
“The lack of a humanoid figure does not necessarily mean lack of emotional intelligence in the agent”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Nakano et al. (2008) focus on the development of strategic frameworks that address multi-domain tasks within educational environments.
“Nakano et al. (2008) focus on the development of strategic frameworks that address multi-domain tasks within educational environments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nakano et al. (2008)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The psychological, social, and motivational dimensions of pedagogical agents play a critical role in fostering learner engagement and rapport.
“The psychological, social, and motivational dimensions of pedagogical agents play a critical role in fostering learner engagement and rapport.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
A central approach in pedagogical agent research involves categorising agents by educational roles, assigning functions such as tutor, mentor, or motivator to enhance specific learning outcomes.
“A central approach in pedagogical agent research involves categorising agents by educational roles, assigning functions such as tutor, mentor, or motivator to enhance specific learning outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Trends with conversational agents outside the education sector tend to focus more on leveraging machine learning techniques, neural networks, IoT, and advanced APIs.
“the trends with conversational agents outside of the education sector tend to have more focus on leveraging machine learning techniques, utilising cutting edge technological concepts such as neural networks, internet of things (IoT) and advanced API's to create more powerful and advanced conversational agents”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
The framework supports task coordination by enabling agents to manage complex interactions among multiple stakeholders, including students, educators, and administrative staff.
“The framework supports task coordination by enabling agents to manage complex interactions among multiple stakeholders, including students, educators, and administrative staff.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nakano et al. (2008)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The development of metacognitive skills, specifically the ability to perform reflection and make decisions based on reflective processes, aids students in their civil and personal development by preparing them to become critical and creative thinkers.
“The development of metacognitive skills, specifically the ability to perform reflection and make decisions based on reflective processes aids students, in addition to their academic learning, in their civil and personal development by preparing them to become critical and creative thinkers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Brookfield, 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- May combine two claims. 67
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 72
- The quote only partly states this claim. 5
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenWithin the simulate and experience label, all the conversational agents are used for face-to-face educational programmes, with the aim of providing context to education for an improved student experience.
“Within the simulate and experience label, all the conversational agents are used for face-to-face educational programmes, with the aim of providing context to education for an improved student experience.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingnone givenThe pedagogic section of the framework presents three tiers of categorisation for the pedagogical functions of conversational agents.
“The pedagogic section of the framework presents three tiers of categorisation for the pedagogical functions of conversational agents.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The 92 studies identified by the search strategy are representative of the state of the art of pedagogical AI conversational agents in higher education.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe first and highest level of categorisation is embodiment, in which every AI conversational agent is labelled as either embodied (some degree of visual or humanistic form) or disembodied (command line or text based, without visual form).
“The first and highest level of categorisation is embodiment, in which every AI conversational agent is labelled as either embodied, wherein the agent has some degree of visual or humanistic form, or disembodied, in which the agent is command line or text based, without visual form.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The 92 studies identified by the search strategy are representative of the state of the art of pedagogical AI conversational agents in higher education.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe studies labelled under reflective skills and metacognitive tend to also be applied to programmes categorised as distance-education, however some studies in this domain are also applied in face-to-face contexts.
“The studies labelled under reflective skills and metacognitive (Bhartiya et al., 2019;Chang et al., 2022;Xiao et al., 2019;Yılmaz et al., 2018) tend to also be applied to programmes categorised as distance-education, however some studies in this domain are also applied in face-to-face contexts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenStudies within assessment domain tend to vary in agent type and mode of study, and is not as explored as other categorisations within the framework hence a smaller sample.
“Studies within this domain tend to vary in agent type and mode of study, and is not as explored as other categorisations within the framework hence a smaller sample.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenAI conversational agents categorised within the pastoral domain aid educational administration tasks to reduce staff workloads and increase efficiency, or build motivation and/or self-efficacy of students.
“The AI conversational agents categorised within the pastoral domain aid educational administration tasks to reduce staff workloads and increase efficiency, or build motivation and/or self-efficacy of students.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The 92 studies identified by the search strategy are representative of the state of the art of pedagogical AI conversational agents in higher education.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAgents in mentoring and coaching can be used in both distance-education (n = 12/26, 46%) and face-to-face education (n = 14/26, 54%).
“agents can be used in both distance-education (n = 12/26, 46%) and face-to-face education (n = 14/26, 54%)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenStudies of AI conversational agents used for instruction aid teaching and learning through instruction or via building on knowledge of core competencies.
“Studies of AI conversational agents used for instruction aid teaching and learning through instruction or via building on knowledge of core competencies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The 92 studies identified by the search strategy are representative of the state of the art of pedagogical AI conversational agents in higher education.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe second level of categorisation, functional type, relates to the specific type of AI conversational agent design in terms of its aesthetic interface, which can be virtual human (anthropomorphic representation), avatar (embodied creature but not completely anthropomorphic or human-like), chatbot (text based communicational agent), or voice bot (audio based agent, allowing only verbal communi
“The second level of categorisation identified as functional type relates to the specific type of AI conversational agent design, in terms of its aesthetic interface, which can be virtual human which is an anthropomorphic representation, avatar which is an embodied creature but not completely anthropomorphic or human-like, chatbot which is a text based communicational agent, or voice bot which is”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The 92 studies identified by the search strategy are representative of the state of the art of pedagogical AI conversational agents in higher education.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationWithin the FAQ's and knowledge base category, all conversational agents aim to increase student participation by answering student queries, and are used in both distance education and face-to-face education.
“Within the FAQ's and knowledge base category, all conversational agents aim to increase student participation by answering student queries, and are used in both distanceeducation and face-to-face education”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationThe aim of the assessment agent is to provide feedback to learners.
“The aim of the agent is to provide feedback to learners”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFrom the studies reviewed, around half of the conversational agents were used in a distance-education programme delivery and the other half were used in a face-to-face programme delivery.
“From the studies reviewed, around half of the conversational agents were used in a distance-education programme delivery and the other half were used in a face-to-face programme delivery.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The 92 studies identified by the search strategy are representative of the state of the art of pedagogical AI conversational agents in higher education.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenCognitive AI conversational agents build the metacognitive functions of students by promoting creative thinking, facilitating experiences or reducing their psychological natural responses.
“Finally, the cognitive AI conversational agents build the metacognitive functions of students by promoting creative thinking, facilitating experiences or reducing their psychological natural responses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The 92 studies identified by the search strategy are representative of the state of the art of pedagogical AI conversational agents in higher education.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingown dataThe characteristics of AI conversational agents were organised into two overarching themes: pedagogical applications and technological functions.
“The characteristics of AI conversational agents were organised into two overarching themes, namely pedagogical applications and technological functions of AI conversational agents.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The 92 studies identified by the search strategy are representative of the state of the art of pedagogical AI conversational agents in higher education.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenMost studies within the simulate and experience label (instructional) are used in healthcare-based education programmes, and are medical technology (MedTech) based research studies.
“Most studies within this label are used in healthcare-based education programmes, and are medical technology (MedTech) based research studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingnone givenThe third and lowest level of categorisation, conversational agent intents, includes eight sections: FAQ's & Knowledge Base, Motivate & Inspire, Admin & Management, Communication, Reflective Skills & Metacognitive, Simulate & Experience, Assessments, and Mentoring & Coaching.
“(5) Reflective Skills & Metacognitive where the conversational agent promotes analytical, divergent, critical and/or creative thinking in learners' to aid learning, (6) Simulate & Experience where the conversational agent provides a platform to stimulate a particular context or role and/or the agent to interact with human emotion to some degree, for example as a patient in healthcare education, (7”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The 92 studies identified by the search strategy are representative of the state of the art of pedagogical AI conversational agents in higher education.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingnone givenThe first and highest level of categorisation, pedagogical purposes, is an overarching primary function of pedagogical application, stated as instructional, pastoral and cognitive.
“The first and highest level of categorisation identified as pedagogical purposes is an overarching primary function of pedagogical application, stated as instructional, pastoral and cognitive.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The 92 studies identified by the search strategy are representative of the state of the art of pedagogical AI conversational agents in higher education.
The quote only partly states this claim.
FindingcitationThe majority of cognitive agents tend to have intents focused on the simulate and experience category.
“Regarding conversational agent intents, the majority agents tend to have intents focused on the simulate and experience category”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe conversational agents within the high-level instructional category labelled as simulate and experience are also used for face-to-face educational programmes, however they are used for an instructional teaching and learning purpose to build student knowledge, as opposed to the cognitive high-level category wherein they are assisting the cognitive functions of students, such as psychological.
“Similar to the cognitive high-level category, the conversational agents within the highlevel instructional category labelled as simulate and experience are also used for faceto-face educational programmes, however they are used for an instructional teaching and learning purpose to build student knowledge, as opposed to the cognitive high-level category wherein they are assisting the cognitive”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe third and lowest level of categorisation, features, indicates the implementation of a specific type of technology, including five sections: Machine Learning, Social/IM Link, External Data Source, Natural Language Processing (API or Native/Natural), and Custom/Unspecified Development.
“This layer of categorisation includes five sections; (1) Machine Learning, wherein the AI conversational agent has additional learning capabilities such as eye tracking, emotion sensors, gaze detection, biometrics etc. to make the conversation more intelligent, emotionally, or otherwise, (2) Social/IM Link which uses a social media or instant messaging (IM) platform as the primary user interface,”
- Also stated in: § Technological functions · plain
“(4) Natural Language Processing (NLP) for understanding human language, which can have two sub-categories, firstly Application Programming Interface (API) wherein the agent connects to an external NLP system such as Facebook (Wit.ai),Python libraries, IBM Watson etc. and secondly Native/Natural NLP wherein the agent uses NLP using built-in libraries or source code, and lastly (5) Custom/Unspec”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The 92 studies identified by the search strategy are representative of the state of the art of pedagogical AI conversational agents in higher education.
- Also stated in: § Technological functions · plain
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn terms of conversational agent intents, the largest category to be explored by researchers is Motivate & Inspire label, wherein most conversational agents (n = 13/17, 76%) are used within face-to-face education programmes while some (n = 4/17, 23%) are used in distance-learning programmes.
“In terms of the conversational agent intents, the largest category to be explored by researchers is Motivate & Inspire label, wherein most conversational agents (n = 13/17, 76%) are used within face-to-face education programmes while some (n = 4/17, 23%) are used in distance-learning programmes”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationFace-to-face agents are generally guided by an instructor or facilitator, tend to be more diverse in embodiment and functional type, and include chatbots, virtual humans or avatars, and voice-bots.
“The agents used for face-to-face education are generally guided by an instructor or facilitator and therefore tend to be more diverse in their embodiment and functional type, and accordingly this category can include chatbots”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe conversational agents within the high-level Pastoral category labelled as Communication are also used for distance-learning programmes, however they are used for pastoral support purposes to aid the learning process by engaging students, as opposed to the Cognitive high-level category wherein they are used as a tool for interaction between students.
“Similar to the Cognitive high-level category, the conversational agents within the high-level Pastoral category labelled as Communication are also used for distancelearning programmes, however they are used for pastoral support purposes to aid the learning process by engaging students, as opposed to the Cognitive high-level category wherein they are used as a tool for interaction between students”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningEach study acknowledges that agents can provide emotional support and foster a positive learning environment.
“Each study acknowledges that agents can provide emotional support and foster a positive learning environment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe most common functional type of pedagogical conversational agent is the chatbot, which is mostly disembodied with text-based inputs and outputs.
“The most common functional type of agent is the chatbot, which is sometimes embodied (Scholten et al., 2019;Xie et al., 2021) but mostly presents as a disembodied agent, having a text-based inputs and outputs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe conversational agents within the high-level Pastoral category labelled as FAQ & Knowledge Base are mostly used for distance-learning programmes (n = 9/10, 90%) to aid student learning and/or act as a student support mechanism, as opposed to the Instructional high-level category wherein they are used as a tool for increasing student participation by answering student queries.
“Furthermore, similar to the Instructional high-level category, the conversational agents within the high-level Pastoral category labelled as FAQ & Knowledge Base are mostly used for distance-learning programmes (n = 9/10, 90%) to aid student learning and/or act as a student support mechanism, as opposed to the Instructional high-level category wherein they are used as a tool for increasing student”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningMost agents within the pastoral group are labelled as distance-education, which shows a contrasting overview to the instructional group, mainly since pastoral AI conversational agents supplement and support teaching and learning as opposed to direct in-class instruction.
“Concerning the mode of study categorisation, most agents within the pastoral group are labelled as distance-education, which shows a contrasting overview to the instructional group, mainly since pastoral AI conversational agents supplement and support teaching and learning as opposed to direct in-class instruction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
FindingcitationDistance-learning agents are generally used by students in their own time and include mostly disembodied chatbots, with some embodied virtual humans.
“The AI conversational agents used for distance-learning are generally used by students in their own time (non-scheduled) and include mostly disembodied chatbots”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningAcross these studies, a common theme emerges regarding the cognitive load management facilitated by agents.
“Across these studies, a common theme emerges regarding the cognitive load management facilitated by agents.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningSocial/IM link agents tend to be disembodied chatbots that use platforms such as Telegram, WhatsApp and Facebook messenger.
“Social/IM link tend to be disembodied chatbots that use platforms such as Telegram, WhatsApp and Facebook messenger”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenStudies in educational technology tend to focus on either the pedagogical impact of their agents or the technological advancement of their agent.
“However, studies within this remit tend to focus on either the pedagogical impact of their agents, or the technological advancement of their agent”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenVirtual human conversational agents are always embodied agents and span over all three pedagogical purposes (cognitive, instructional and pastoral).
“Virtual human conversational agents are always embodied agents and span over all three pedagogical purposes (cognitive, instructional and pastoral).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenKim and Baylor (2006) categorise roles statically, while Tao et al. (2008) advocate for a more flexible, dynamic role adaptation.
“However, while Kim and Baylor (2006) categorise roles statically, Tao et al. (2008) advocate for a more flexible, dynamic role adaptation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe voice bot is the least popular functional type of pedagogical conversational agent and is only used within the cognitive pedagogical purpose.
“The last and least-popular functional type of pedagogical conversational agent is the voice bot, which is only used within the cognitive pedagogical purpose (Morris & Chen, 2020, 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenThe agents within the Motivate & Inspire category tend to have anthropomorphic aesthetic characteristics.
“The agents within this category tend to have anthropomorphic aesthetic characteristics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThere is a lack of focus on cognitive agents in general and instructional agents specifically focusing on assessment.
“There appears to be a lack of focus on cognitive agents in general and instructional agents specifically focusing on assessment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFrom the surveyed pedagogical conversational agents, some used native NLP libraries, but many linked to common and sometimes open-source NLP systems through API connections.
“From the pedagogical conversational agents surveyed, some used native NLP libraries such as the study by Hsu et al. (2021) that uses a custom Python library, but many agents linked to common and sometimes opensource NLP systems through API connections to services such as Google's DialogFlow (Gonda & Chu, 2019), Juji.ai (Gupta & Chen, 2022), NLP.js (Winkler et al., 2020), IBM's Watson (Gonda et al.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe highest-level categorisation of the technological functions is the cyber-physical and visual embodiment of the conversational agents which, based on the thematic analysis conducted, has been classified as embodied and disembodied.
“The highest-level categorisation of the technological functions is the cyber-physical and visual embodiment of the conversational agents which, based on the thematic analysis conducted, has been classified as embodied and disembodied.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
FindingcitationEvery pedagogical agent analysed within the remit of this survey can be considered within the construct of embodiment.
“Every pedagogical agent analysed within the remit of this survey can be considered within the construct of embodiment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe majority of AI conversational agents exploit NLP capabilities and have provisions for connecting to various data sources.
“In reference to the technological functions, the majority of AI conversational agents exploit NLP capabilities to ensure users can effectively and easily communicate with the agents and have provisions for connecting to various data sources to draw meaningful conversations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
FindingreasoningThere is a lack of research that focuses on the use of LLMs for pedagogical purposes.
“Due to its recent inception, there is a lack of research that focuses on the use of LLMs for pedagogical purposes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThey highlight the need for agents to adapt to individual learners' emotional and motivational needs, suggesting that personalised interactions can lead to better educational outcomes.
“They highlight the need for agents to adapt to individual learners' emotional and motivational needs, suggesting that personalised interactions can lead to better educational outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenAll sources recognise that human-like gestures and facial expressions contribute to a more relatable and effective learning experience.
“All sources recognise that human-like gestures and facial expressions contribute to a more relatable and effective learning experience.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
FindingreasoningAll these studies recognise the importance of scalability in deploying pedagogical agents across various educational settings.
“All these studies recognise the importance of scalability in deploying pedagogical agents across various educational settings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe review highlighted the diverse applications of these agents in various educational contexts.
“The review has highlighted the diverse applications of these agents in various educational contexts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningWhen comparing these studies, several shared themes emerge regarding strategic implementation in educational contexts, such as scalability and task management.
“When comparing these studies, several shared themes emerge regarding strategic implementation in educational contexts, such as scalability and task management.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingown dataThe conceptual framework presented in the study has two overarching themes: pedagogical applications and technological functions of pedagogical AI conversational agents.
“The conceptual framework presented in this study has two overarching themes which include the pedagogical applications, and technological functions of pedagogical AI conversational agents.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe frameworks share a common goal of enhancing educational outcomes through the strategic use of conversational agents, yet they differ in their focus areas, ranging from psychological and social dynamics to cognitive processes and technological functions.
“The frameworks share a common goal of enhancing educational outcomes through the strategic use of conversational agents, yet they differ in their focus areas, ranging from psychological and social dynamics to cognitive processes and technological functions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe study found many disembodied chatbots having NLP capabilities, which creates an intelligent agent able to identify users' intentions from verbal cues in natural language.
“this study has found many disembodied chatbots having NLP capabilities, which creates an intelligent agent, as the agent is able to identify users' intentions from verbal cues in natural language.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataOf the 92 studies, 50 were conducted in face-to-face mode and 42 in distance education mode.
“Face-to-face | 50”
- Also stated in: § Conclusions · plain
“Distance | 42”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Conclusions · plain
May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataOf the 92 studies, the pedagogical purposes were cognitive (14), pastoral (37), and instructional (41).
“Cognitive | 14”
- Also stated in: § Conclusions · plain
“Pastoral | 37”
- Also stated in: § Conclusions · plain
“Instructional | 41”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Conclusions · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe technological functions of AI conversational agents were found to be either embodied or disembodied, and to belong to one of four functional types (virtual human, avatar, chatbot, or voice bot), and to have one or more of five technological functions (machine learning, natural language processing, external data source, social and instant messaging link, or custom and/or unspecified development
“The technological functions of AI conversational agents were found to be either embodied or disembodied, and belong to one of four functional types; (1) virtual human, (2) avatar, (3) chatbot or (4) voice bot, and to have one (or more) of five technological functions; (1) machine learning, (2) natural language processing, 3) external data source, (4) social and instant messaging link or (5) custom”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningEach framework addresses task coordination uniquely, contributing to an understanding of how agents support instructional goals.
“Each framework addresses task coordination uniquely, contributing to an understanding of how agents support instructional goals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenThe conversational agents that exploit natural language processing systems also fall into one of two sub-types: native and natural or application programming interface systems.
“The conversational agents that exploit natural language processing systems also fall into one of two sub-types; native and natural or application programming interface systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPedagogical applications of AI conversational agents were found to belong to one of three pedagogical purposes (pastoral, instructional, or cognitive) and to specify into one of two modes of study (face-to-face or distance-education).
“Pedagogical applications of AI conversational agents were found to belong to one of three pedagogical purposes; (1) pastoral, (2) instructional or (3) cognitive, and specify into one of two modes of study, face-to-face or distance-education.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenStudies of conversational agents used for Instruction aid teaching and learning through instruction or via building on knowledge of core competencies.
“Studies of conversational agents used for Instruction aid teaching and learning through instruction or via building on knowledge of core competencies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataAnomalies and irregularities in the thematic analysis were rectified through validation, ensuring all studies in the literature dataset found a home in each thematic layer, arriving at a consensus pool of overarching themes and sub-themes.
“Any anomalies found (such as where a study would not be identified within a set a theme) or other irregularities and inconsistencies were rectified through validation, which ensured that all the studies in the literature dataset found a home in each of the thematic layers, finally arriving at a consensus pool of overarching themes and sub-themes that set the foundation on which the findings of”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPedagogical applications and technological functions complement each other, as increased technological functions can enable a wider range of pedagogical applications, and more specified pedagogical applications often require more specialised technological functions.
“Both of these overarching themes complement each other, as increased technological functions can enable a wider range of pedagogical applications, and more specified pedagogical applications often require more specialised technological functions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The 92 studies identified by the search strategy are representative of the state of the art of pedagogical AI conversational agents in higher education.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe review process was partially conducted based on the conventions and guidelines applied by Petersen et al. (2008).
“The review process of this study is partially conducted based on the conventions and guidelines applied by Petersen et al. (2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Petersen et al. (2008)
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenThe technological functions of pedagogical AI conversational agents can be considered in terms of embodiment (embodied/disembodied) and functional type and features.
“The technological functions of the agents are also considered in terms of embodiment (embodied/disembodied) and functional type and features.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The 92 studies identified by the search strategy are representative of the state of the art of pedagogical AI conversational agents in higher education.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationConversational agents have been demonstrated to supplement and advance education in various forms, such as providing assessment of learners' work, increasing peer dialogue, providing a context for education (e.g., role-play in healthcare education), and answering student queries.
“Conversational agents have been demonstrated to supplement and advance education in various forms, such as providing assessment of learners work (Maryadi et al., 2017), increasing peer dialogue (Wang et al., 2020), providing a context for education, for example in coordinating role-play in healthcare education (Shorey et al., 2019), and answering student queries (Gonda & Chu, 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Maryadi et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wang et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Shorey et al., 2019 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenPedagogical AI conversational agents can primarily be considered in terms of their pedagogical applications and pedagogical purposes, which include pastoral, instructional and cognitive, and are further considered in terms of mode of study and intent.
“The conceptual framework proposes that pedagogical AI conversational agents can primarily be considered in terms of their pedagogical applications and their pedagogical purposes, which include pastoral, instructional and cognitive, and are further considered in terms of mode of study and intent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The 92 studies identified by the search strategy are representative of the state of the art of pedagogical AI conversational agents in higher education.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDue to the recent global Covid-19 pandemic in 2020, distance education has significantly increased in many higher educational institutes and has become the normal standard.
“According to Yarmak et al. (2021), due to the recent global Covid-19 pandemic in 2020, distance education has significantly increased in many higher educational institutes (HEI) and has become the normal standard”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yarmak et al. (2021)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe databases selected for the survey are the most relevant sources for computer-related studies.
“The databases selected for the survey are presented in Table 1, and were selected as they are the most relevant sources for computer-related studies (Dyba et al., 2007;Kitchenham & Charters, 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Dyba et al., 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kitchenham & Charters, 2007
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThere was only one coder involved in the thematic analysis, and therefore interrater reliability consideration was not required.
“There was only one coder involved in the process and therefore interrater reliability consideration was not required.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenPastoral agents aid educational administration tasks to reduce workloads and increase efficiency or build motivation and/or self-efficacy of students.
“The conversational agents categorised within the Pastoral domain aid educational administration tasks to reduce workloads and increase efficiency or build motivation and/or self-efficacy of students.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAlthough studies relate to aiding programmes in either of the two modes of delivery, the findings of the studies can be intermingled as the benefit of the experiments are not limited to the mode in which they are placed.
“Furthermore, although studies relate to aiding programmes in either of the two modes of delivery, the findings of the studies can be intermingled as the benefit of the experiments are not limited to the mode in which they are placed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe selection, extraction, and analysis processes are not an exact science, and the results may have elements of subjective research.
“It must be noted that the selection, extraction, and analysis processes are not an exact science as there are no absolute rules, nor container in the proposed research domain to follow or adhere to, hence the results may have elements of subjective research.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenCognitive agents build the metacognitive functions of the students by promoting creative thinking, giving experiences or reducing the psychological natural responses.
“Cognitive agents build the metacognitive functions of the students by promoting creative thinking, giving experiences or reducing the psychological natural responses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMarín (2014) introduces a social dimension, suggesting that emotional and social aspects are as crucial as cognitive support in the learning process.
“Marín (2014) introduces a social dimension, suggesting that emotional and social aspects are as crucial as cognitive support in the learning process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Marín (2014)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTao et al. (2008) propose a framework that integrates psychological incentive mechanisms, suggesting that Expert, Mentor, and Motivator agents stimulate learners' internal motivation.
“Tao et al. (2008) propose a framework that integrates psychological incentive mechanisms, suggesting that Expert, Mentor, and Motivator agents stimulate learners' internal motivation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tao et al. (2008)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWithin developed countries, education-focused applications appear to be slower in adopting the latest advancements in digital transformation technologies and gaining investment in cutting-edge technologies compared to sectors such as finance and pharma.
“Within developed countries, and especially in a post-Covid United Kingdom, education focused applications appear to be slower in adopting the latest advancements in digital transformation technologies and gaining investment in cutting-edge technologies, while sectors such as finance and pharma appear to benefit more from public sector investment”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Bell, 2023
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hacker & Dreifus, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Johnson et al., 2023
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationZhao et al. (2014) emphasise agents' ability to adapt to learners' emotional states, noting that timely feedback can enhance learner motivation.
“Zhao et al. (2014) emphasise agents' ability to adapt to learners' emotional states, noting that timely feedback can enhance learner motivation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhao et al. (2014)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTheir contribution lies in emphasising scalability, allowing pedagogical agents to operate across various educational contexts and disciplines.
“Their contribution lies in emphasising scalability, allowing pedagogical agents to operate across various educational contexts and disciplines.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nakano et al. (2008)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningDisembodied conversational agents generally lack bodily form and thus, are centred on a text-based graphical user interface.
“Disembodied conversational agents generally lack bodily form and thus, are centred on a text-based graphical user interface.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMarín (2014) emphasises agents' roles in fostering social interaction and emotional support, suggesting that virtual peer interactions contribute to empathy and social equality among learners, thereby improving learning outcomes.
“Marín (2014) emphasises agents' roles in fostering social interaction and emotional support, suggesting that virtual peer interactions contribute to empathy and social equality among learners, thereby improving learning outcomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Marín (2014)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFakinlede et al. (2013) highlight agents as virtual companions, not only providing academic support but also fostering positive learning environments that mitigate isolation.
“Fakinlede et al. (2013) highlight agents as virtual companions, not only providing academic support but also fostering positive learning environments that mitigate isolation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fakinlede et al. (2013)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMoreno (2004) focuses on cognitive processing, proposing that agents aid in organising learning materials and managing cognitive load.
“Moreno (2004) focuses on cognitive processing, proposing that agents aid in organising learning materials and managing cognitive load.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Moreno (2004)
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThis research has adopted the view stipulated by Ziemke (2023) which posits that embodied conversational agents have 'organismic' and physical attributes which make them anthropomorphic based on their visual aesthetic and/or ability of interaction with users.
“This research has adopted the view stipulated by Ziemke (2023) which posits that embodied conversational agents have”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ziemke (2023)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMayer and DaPra (2012) integrate social agency, arguing that agents can enhance comprehension through rapport-building, while Zhao et al. (2014) highlight the adaptability of agents in providing personalised support.
“Mayer and DaPra (2012) integrate social agency, arguing that agents can enhance comprehension through rapport-building, while Zhao et al. (2014) highlight the adaptability of agents in providing personalised support.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Mayer and DaPra (2012)
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Zhao et al. (2014)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningDisembodied conversational agents are more common in pedagogical contexts due to being easier to develop, requiring less visual programming expertise and computational power for rendering media outputs.
“Such conversational agents are more common in pedagogical contexts due to being easier to develop, requiring less visual programming expertise and computational power for rendering media outputs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationKim and Baylor (2006) classify pedagogical agents into three roles: Expert, Mentor, and Motivator.
“Kim and Baylor (2006) classify pedagogical agents into three roles: Expert, Mentor, and Motivator.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kim and Baylor (2006)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThe use of LLMs is likely to become much more common in light of new vendors developing AI conversational agents using this approach.
“The use of LLMs is likely to become much more common in light of new vendors developing AI conversational agents using this approach (Dilmegani, 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dilmegani, 2023
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLemon et al. (2002) highlights natural language processing capabilities as crucial for creating an immersive learning environment.
“Lemon et al. (2002) highlights natural language processing capabilities as crucial for creating an immersive learning environment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lemon et al. (2002)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationKomatani et al. (2006) emphasise multi-threaded dialogue management, showing how agents' ability to manage multiple conversation threads enhances user engagement.
“Komatani et al. (2006) emphasise multi-threaded dialogue management, showing how agents' ability to manage multiple conversation threads enhances user engagement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Komatani et al. (2006)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenLarge language models (LLMs) are a rapidly emerging technology for the development of AI conversational agents.
“One rapidly emerging technology is the use of large language models (LLMs) for the development of AI conversational agents.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMin et al. (2019) and Mayer and DaPra (2012) discuss embodiment, with findings indicating that human-like gestures improve interaction quality and foster social presence.
“Min et al. (2019) and Mayer and DaPra (2012) discuss embodiment, with findings indicating that human-like gestures improve interaction quality and foster social presence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Min et al. (2019)
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Mayer and DaPra (2012)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTao et al. (2008) propose that agents should switch flexibly among roles such as knowledge provider, emotional stimulator, and organiser to better meet diverse student needs.
“Tao et al. (2008) propose that agents should switch flexibly among roles such as knowledge provider, emotional stimulator, and organiser to better meet diverse student needs, enhancing adaptability in learning contexts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tao et al. (2008)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningVoice bots have limitations such as lack of visual engagement and dependence on a singular human sense, which makes them less inclusive in terms of actual use.
“It is not explored due to the various and obvious limitations of the voice bot, such as lack of visual engagement and dependence on a singular human sense, which also makes it less inclusive in terms of actual use.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationStudents consistently need to reflect on their knowledge, methods of learning and revision techniques to build better memory retention, gain a better understanding of their subject matter, and avoid unconscious biases from directing their critical judgement through implicit assumptions.
“Students consistently need to reflect on their knowledge, methods of learning and revision techniques to build better memory retention, gain a better understanding of their subject matter, and avoid unconscious biases from directing their critical judgement through implicit assumptions (Brookfield, 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Brookfield, 2021
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLemon et al. (2002) focus on adaptable dialogue systems, and Marín (2014) provides structured role definitions across educational contexts.
“As previously discussed, Lemon et al. (2002) focus on adaptable dialogue systems, and Marín (2014) provides structured role definitions across educational contexts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Lemon et al. (2002)
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Marín (2014)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAcademic and faculty staff satisfaction in higher education is an area of interest for universities as it is linked to staff effectiveness and retainment.
“Academic and faculty staff satisfaction in higher education is an area of interest for universities as it is linked to staff effectiveness and retainment (Gillespie et al., 2001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gillespie et al., 2001 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationReflections are an important tool for the teacher or instructor, as reflective practice allows progress in pedagogical ability by reflecting on sessions and identifying areas of weakness and implementing perpetual improvements.
“reflections are also an important tool for the teacher or instructor, as reflective practice allows progress in pedagogical ability, by reflecting on sessions and identifying areas of weakness and implementing perpetual improvements, consistently (Tay et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tay et al., 2023
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe literature review and conceptual framework demonstrated the growing trend and potential benefits of using AI conversational agents for pedagogical purposes in higher education.
“this literature review and conceptual framework has demonstrated the growing trend and potential benefits of using AI conversational agents for pedagogical purposes in higher education.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationStudent satisfaction is a key performance indicator for universities, and in many countries such as the UK, institutions have a legal responsibility to declare student satisfaction results to regulatory bodies, and student satisfaction also affects legalities related to student-university relationship in contract law.
“Student satisfaction is a key performance indicator for universities, and in many countries such as the UK, institutions have a legal responsibility to declare student satisfaction results to regulatory bodies, and student satisfaction also affects legalities related to student-university relationship in contract law (Gaffney-Rhys & Jones, 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gaffney-Rhys & Jones, 2010
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn many higher education institutes, teaching and faculty staff employ considerable time on assessment and feedback but have very little professional development in how to design assessments.
“In many higher education institutes, teaching and faculty staff employ considerable time on assessment and feedback,”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McConlogue, 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationReflection is a crucial aspect of learning, especially in higher education.
“Another crucial aspect of learning is reflection, especially in higher education (Harvey et al., 2016;Moon, 2004).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Harvey et al., 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Moon, 2004
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAssessment processes are one of the most cited factors linked to causing student stress and anxiety in higher education.
“assessment processes are one of the most cited factors linked to causing student stress and anxiety in higher education (McConlogue, 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McConlogue, 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe conceptual framework developed in this study provides a comprehensive understanding of the key components and design principles of pedagogical AI conversational agents and offers a useful framework for future research and development in this field.
“The conceptual framework developed in this study provides a comprehensive understanding of the key components and design principles of pedagogical AI conversational agents and offers a useful framework for future research and development in this field.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe conceptual framework developed in the current study distinguishes itself from frameworks in the wider literature by offering a comprehensive approach that integrates both pedagogical applications and technological considerations, making it particularly suited to the complexities of higher education.
“The conceptual framework developed in the current study distinguishes itself from frameworks presented in the wider literature to date by offering a comprehensive approach that integrates both pedagogical applications and technological considerations, making it particularly suited to the complexities of higher education.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningA cause of stress and burnout is not necessarily having a high number of students, but rather the lack of management tools available to handle a high number of students.
“When analysed, it is apparent that a cause of stress and burnout is not necessarily having a high number of students, but rather the lack of management tools available to handle a high number of students.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA major factor in faculty staff dissatisfaction is occupational stress, a primary cause of which is exposure to high numbers of students, especially tuition of postgraduates, which strongly predicts the experience of burnout.
“A major factor in faculty staff dissatisfaction is occupational stress, a primary cause of which is”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Watts & Robertson, 2011
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe conceptual framework developed in the current study builds upon and extends existing frameworks by providing a comprehensive categorisation of pedagogical conversational agents that integrates both pedagogical applications and technological functions.
“the conceptual framework developed in the current study builds upon, and extends existing frameworks, by providing a comprehensive categorisation of pedagogical conversational agents that integrates both pedagogical applications and technological functions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMany pedagogical instructional theories are based on the process of reflection, for instance Experiential Learning Theory which posits that learning happens through experimentation, reflection, thought and action.
“Many pedagogical instructional theories are based on the process of reflection, for instance Experiential Learning Theory which posits that learning happens through experimentation, reflection, thought and action (Kolb, 1984).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kolb, 1984
Not checked in the free run.
The paper relies on this without support.
The 92 studies identified by the search strategy are representative of the state of the art of pedagogical AI conversational agents in higher education.
“The resulting literature sample (n = 92) was analysed using thematic template analysis”
“only 92 studies remained”
The paper relies on this without support.
The literature search strategy and databases used were comprehensive enough to identify all relevant studies on pedagogical AI conversational agents in higher education.
“To the best of our knowledge, there is no existing research that surveys and categorises contemporary research studies across the full range of pedagogical AI conversational agents, specifically in the higher education landscape based on both, their pedagogical and technological functions.”
“The databases selected for the survey are presented in Table 1, and were selected as they are the most relevant sources for computer-related studies (Dyba et al., 2007;Kitchenham & Charters, 2007).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Assessment processes directly lead to grades, results, and degree classifications, which can have significant impacts on student progression, retainment, graduate destinations and in some cases on teacher reputation.
“assessment processes directly lead to grades, results, and degree classifications, which can have significant impacts on student progression, retainment, graduate destinations and in some cases on teacher reputation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The ability to manage the learning journey appropriately, with clear communication between the faculty department and the student, impacts on student satisfaction.
“the ability to manage the learning journey appropriately, with clear communication between the faculty department and the student also impacts on student satisfaction.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Aside from VLEs such as Moodle, Blackboard, Teams and otherwise, the use of technological tools to manage students in terms of learning progression, educational journey recording, student-teacher communication, requests for help and logistical variables are scarce.
“Aside from VLE's such as Moodle, Blackboard, Teams and otherwise, the use of technological tools to manage students in terms of learning progression, educational journey recording, student-teacher communication, requests for help and logistical variables are scarce.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Technological innovations within the area of reflection are not widespread.
“technological innovations within this area are not widespread”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
With GenAI, the unit of analysis shifts from the isolated learner to human-AI ensembles, calling for role taxonomies that move beyond tool/teammate labels to account for co-regulation and distributed cognition.
“With GenAI, the unit of analysis shifts from the isolated learner to human-AI ensembles, calling for role taxonomies that move beyond tool/teammate labels to account for co-regulation and distributed cognition [53].”
From A Systematic Review of Generative AI in K–12: Mapping Goals, Activities, Roles, and Outcomes via the 3P Model (2025) · cites this paper as [53]
The “Role-based functions and educational support models” section (page unavailable) proposes a broader, adaptable taxonomy of pedagogical-agent roles, including pastoral, instructional, and cognitive support. It does not say that GenAI shifts the unit of analysis to human–AI ensembles, or frame the taxonomy in terms of co-regulation and distributed cognition. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Shorey et al. is treated as a virtual human but tabulated as an avatar
MinorIn the discussion of virtual human agents, Shorey et al. (2019) is given as an example of one linked to an external NLP system. Table 6 instead assigns that study the functional type "Av" (avatar).
“Some are then then linked to external NLP systems via API's such as DialogFlow (Shorey et al., 2019) to create advanced communicative dialogue.”
“Shorey et al. (2019) x x x Av x”
Scholten et al. is called a chatbot but tabulated as an avatar
MinorThe text cites Scholten et al. (2019) as an example of an embodied chatbot, while Table 6 assigns it the functional type "Av" (avatar).
“The most common functional type of agent is the chatbot, which is sometimes embodied (Scholten et al., 2019;Xie et al., 2021) but mostly presents as a disembodied agent”
“Scholten et al. (2019) x x x Av x”
Cites
I.—COMPUTING MACHINERY AND INTELLIGENCE
TURING, A. M. (1950) · Mind · doi:10.1093/mind/lix.236.433 · Cited by 10,290 · see citing works
ELIZA—a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine
Weizenbaum, J. (1966) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/365153.365168 · Cited by 4,452 · see citing works
Systematic Mapping Studies in Software Engineering
Petersen, K., Feldt, R., Mujtaba, S., & Mattsson, M. (2008) · Electronic Workshops in Computing · doi:10.14236/ewic/ease2008.8 · Cited by 3,239 · see citing works
Building a Conceptual Framework: Philosophy, Definitions, and Procedure
Jabareen, Y. (2009) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/160940690900800406 · Cited by 1,559 · see citing works
Artificial hallucinations in ChatGPT: implications in scientific writing
Alkaissi, H., & McFarlane, S. I. (2023) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.35179 · Cited by 1,540 · see citing works
Conversational agents in healthcare: a systematic review
Laranjo, L., Dunn, A. G., Tong, H. L., Kocaballi, A. B., Chen, J., Bashir, R., Surian, D., Gallego, B., Magrabi, F., Lau, A. Y. S., et al. (2018) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocy072 · Cited by 1,388 · see citing works
Chatbots: History, technology, and applications
Adamopoulou, E., & Moussiades, L. (2020) · Machine Learning with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.mlwa.2020.100006 · Cited by 1,090 · see citing works
Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education: Learning for the Longer Term
(2007) · doi:10.4324/9780203964309 · Cited by 1,049 · see citing works
Research Methods for Clinical and Health Psychology
Marks, D. F., & Yardley, L. (2004) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781849209793 · Cited by 929 · see citing works
Interacting with educational chatbots: A systematic review
Kuhail, M. A., Alturki, N., Alramlawi, S., & Alhejori, K. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11177-3 · Cited by 841 · see citing works
The design and implementation of Xiaoice, an empathetic social chatbot
Zhou, L., Gao, J., Li, D., & Shum, H.-Y. (2020) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00368 · Cited by 777 · see citing works
Gillespie, N. A., Walsh, M., Winefield, A. H., Dua, J., & Stough, C. (2001) · Work & Stress · doi:10.1080/02678370117944 · Cited by 695 · see citing works
Chen, Y., Jensen, S., Albert, L. J., Gupta, S., & Lee, T. (2023) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-022-10291-4 · Cited by 685 · see citing works
Stephanidis, C., Salvendy, G., Antona, M., Chen, J. Y. C., Dong, J., Duffy, V. G., Fang, X., Fidopiastis, C., Fragomeni, G., Fu, L. P., et al. (2019) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2019.1619259 · Cited by 524 · see citing works
Burnout in university teaching staff: a systematic literature review
Watts, J., & Robertson, N. (2011) · Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00131881.2011.552235 · Cited by 490 · see citing works
Rediscovering the use of chatbots in education: A systematic literature review
Pérez, J. Q., Daradoumis, T., & Puig, J. M. M. (2020) · Computer Applications in Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/cae.22326 · Cited by 483 · see citing works
Applying Systematic Reviews to Diverse Study Types: An Experience Report
Dyba, T., Dingsoyr, T., & Hanssen, G. K. (2007) · First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2007) · doi:10.1109/esem.2007.59 · Cited by 391 · see citing works
Yin, J., Goh, T.-T., Yang, B., & Xiaobin, Y. (2021) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633120952067 · Cited by 349 · see citing works
An embodiment effect in computer-based learning with animated pedagogical agents.
Mayer, R. E., & DaPra, C. S. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/a0028616 · Cited by 324 · see citing works
Survey of conversational agents in health
Montenegro, J. L. Z., da Costa, C. A., & da Rosa Righi, R. (2019) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2019.03.054 · Cited by 322 · see citing works
Diederich, S., Brendel, B., TU Dresden, G., Morana, S., & Kolbe, L. M. (2022) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00724 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
A Social-Cognitive Framework for Pedagogical Agents as Learning Companions
Kim, Y. A., & Baylor, A. L. (2006) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-006-0637-3 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Chang, C., Hwang, G., & Gau, M. (2022) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13158 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
Digital Natives and Digital Immigrants
Wang, Q., Myers, M. D., & Sundaram, D. (2013) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-013-0296-y · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Shorey, S., Ang, E., Yap, J., Ng, E. D., Lau, S. T., & Chui, C. K. (2019) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/14658 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Cano, E. V., Andrés, S. M., & Menéses, E. L. (2021) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-021-00269-8 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Fidan, M., & Gencel, N. (2022) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/07356331221077901 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Kumar, J. A. (2021) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-021-00302-w · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Winkler, R., Hobert, S., Salovaara, A., Söllner, M., & Leimeister, J. M. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376781 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Conversational Agents: Goals, Technologies, Vision and Challenges
Allouch, M., Azaria, A., & Azoulay, R. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21248448 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Intelligent Assistants in Higher-Education Environments
Hien, H. T., Pham-Nguyen, C., Nam, L. N. H., Nhung, H. L. T. K., & Dinh, T. L. (2018) · International Symposium on Information and Communication Technology · doi:10.1145/3287921.3287937 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Using a pedagogical agent to deliver conversational style instruction: What benefits can you obtain?
Lin, L., Ginns, P., Wang, T., & Zhang, P. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103658 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Conversational agents in business: A systematic literature review and future research directions
Bavaresco, R., Silveira, D., Reis, E., Barbosa, J., Righi, R., Costa, C., Antunes, R., Gomes, M., Gatti, C., Vanzin, M., et al. (2020) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2020.100239 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Harvey, M., Coulson, D., & McMaugh, A. (2016) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1.13.2.2 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Liew, T. W., Zin, N. A. M., & Ashaari, N. S. (2017) · Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences · doi:10.1186/s13673-017-0089-2 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Ayedoun, E., Hayashi, Y., & Seta, K. (2019) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-018-0171-6 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
A conversation with ChatGPT on the role of computational systems biology in stem cell research
Cahan, P., & Treutlein, B. (2023) · Stem Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2022.12.009 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Proposing a task-oriented chatbot system for EFL learners speaking practice
Hsu, M.-H., Chen, P.-S., & Yu, C.-S. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2021.1960864 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Online chat and chatbots to enhance mature student engagement in higher education
Abbas, N., Whitfield, J., Atwell, E., Bowman, H., Pickard, T., & Walker, A. (2022) · International Journal of Lifelong Education · doi:10.1080/02601370.2022.2066213 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
The evaluation of chatbot as a tool for health literacy education among undergraduate students
Mokmin, N. A. M., & Ibrahim, N. A. (2021) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10542-y · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Neumann, A. T., Arndt, T., Köbis, L., Meissner, R., Martin, A., de Lange, P., Pengel, N., Klamma, R., & Wollersheim, H.-W. (2021) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2021.668220 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Krämer, N. C., Karacora, B., Lucas, G., Dehghani, M., Rüther, G., & Gratch, J. S. (2016) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.04.002 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
“Interacting with a conversational agent system for educational purposes in online courses.”
Song, D., Oh, E. Y., & Rice, M. (2017) · 2017 10th International Conference on Human System Interactions (HSI) · doi:10.1109/hsi.2017.8005002 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
The appearance effect: Influences of virtual agent features on performance and motivation
Shiban, Y., Schelhorn, I., Jobst, V., Hörnlein, A., Puppe, F., Pauli, P., & Mühlberger, A. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.077 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Effects of self-regulation scaffolding on online participation and learning outcomes
Song, D., & Kim, D. (2021) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2020.1767525 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Choose your programming copilot
Sobania, D., Briesch, M., & Rothlauf, F. (2022) · Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO) · doi:10.1145/3512290.3528700 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Tegos, S., Demetriadis, S., & Karakostas, A. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.014 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Maicher, K. R., Danforth, D. R., Price, A., Zimmerman, L., Wilcox, B., Liston, B. W., Cronau, H., Belknap, L., Ledford, C. H., Way, D. P., et al. (2016) · Simulation in Healthcare The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare · doi:10.1097/sih.0000000000000195 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Tegos, S. D., Demetriadis, S., & Tsiatsos, Τ. (2013) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-013-0007-3 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Design of a chatbot as a distance learning assistant
Tamayo, P. A., Herrero, A., Martín, J., Navarro, C., & Tránchez, J. M. (2019) · Open Praxis · doi:10.5944/openpraxis.12.1.1063 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Xiao, Z., Zhou, M. X., & Fu, W.-T. (2019) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) · doi:10.1145/3301275.3302264 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
The Effect of the Metacognitive Support via Pedagogical Agent on Self-Regulation Skills
Yılmaz, F. G. K., Olpak, Y. Z., & Yılmaz, R. (2017) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633117707696 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Tegos, S. D., Demetriadis, S., Papadopoulos, P. M., & Weinberger, A. (2016) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-016-9246-2 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
“Evaluation of developing educational chatbots based on the seven principles for good teaching.”
Gonda, D. E., Luo, J., Wong, Y.-L., & Lei, C.-U. (2018) · 2018 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE) · doi:10.1109/tale.2018.8615175 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Moon, J., & Ryu, J. (2020) · Journal of Computing in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s12528-020-09255-x · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Qualitative exploration of digital chatbot use in medical education: A pilot study
Kaur, A., Singh, S., Chandan, J. S., Robbins, T., & Patel, V. (2021) · DIGITAL HEALTH · doi:10.1177/20552076211038151 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Rule-based chabot for student enquiries
Singh, J., Joesph, M. H., & Jabbar, K. B. A. (2019) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1228/1/012060 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Covid 19 – A Major Cause of Digital Transformation in Education or Just an Evaluation Test
Mladenova, T., Kalmukov, Y., & Valova, I. (2020) · TEM Journal · doi:10.18421/tem93-42 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
González, L. A., Neyem, A., Contreras‐McKay, I., & Molina, D. (2022) · Computer Applications in Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/cae.22526 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
A Voice Interactive Multilingual Student Support System using IBM Watson
Ralston, K., Chen, Y., Isah, H., & Zulkernine, F. H. (2019) · International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications · doi:10.1109/icmla.2019.00309 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Using a Machine Learning Architecture to Create an AI-Powered Chatbot for Anatomy Education
Li, Y. S., Lam, C. S. N., & See, C. (2021) · Medical Science Educator · doi:10.1007/s40670-021-01405-9 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Can a Humorous Conversational Agent Enhance Learning Experience and Outcomes?
Ceha, J., Lee, K. J., Nilsen, E., Goh, J., & Law, E. (2021) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445068 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Lecturer's Apprentice: A Chatbot for Assisting Novice Programmers
Ismail, M., & Ade-Ibijola, A. (2019) · International Multidisciplinary Information Technology and Engineering Conference (IMITEC) · doi:10.1109/imitec45504.2019.9015857 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
“Using a multiplatform chatbot as an online tutor in a university course.”
Lee, L.-K., Fung, Y.-C., Pun, Y.-W., Wong, K.-K., Yu, M. T.-Y., & Wu, N.-I. (2020) · 2020 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET) · doi:10.1109/iset49818.2020.00021 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Using chatbots to aid transition
Carayannopoulos, S. (2017) · International Journal of Information and Learning Technology · doi:10.1108/ijilt-10-2017-0097 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Multi-tasking and collaborative activities in dialogue systems
Lemon, O., Gruenstein, A., Battle, A., et al. (2002) · SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue (SIGDIAL) · doi:10.3115/1118121.1118137 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Yılmaz, R., & Yılmaz, F. G. K. (2020) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-020-09741-0 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Hayashi, Y. (2020) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-020-09333-3 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Development of an Empathy-Centric Counseling Chatbot System Capable of Sentimental Dialogue Analysis
Trappey, A. J. C., Lin, A. P. C., Hsu, K. Y. K., Trappey, C. V., & Tu, K. L. K. (2022) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr10050930 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Gonda, D. E., & Chu, B. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering · doi:10.1109/tale48000.2019.9225974 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Benefits of Affective Pedagogical Agents in Multimedia Instruction
Wang, Y., Feng, X., Guo, J., Gong, S., Wu, Y., & Wang, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.797236 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Nelekar, S., Abdulrahman, A., Gupta, M., & Richards, D. (2021) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13174 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
A Conversational Agent to Improve Response Quality in Course Evaluations
Wambsganß, T., Winkler, R., Söllner, M., & Leimeister, J. M. (2020) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3334480.3382805 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Ba, S., Stein, D., Liu, Q., Long, T., Xie, K., & Wu, L. (2021) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633121992421 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Liew, T. W., & Tan, S.-M. (2016) · International Conference on Digital Information Management · doi:10.1109/icdim.2016.7829758 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Villegas-Ch, W. E., García-Ortiz, J., Mullo-Ca, K., Sánchez-Viteri, S., & Cañizares, M. R. (2021) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi13040097 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Developing a Task-Based Dialogue System for English Language Learning
Li, K.-C., Chang, M., & Wu, K.-H. (2020) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci10110306 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Artificial Neural Network Based University Chatbot System
Bhartiya, N., Jangid, N., Jannu, S., Shukla, P., & Chapaneri, R. (2019) · IEEE Bombay Section Signature Conference (IBSSC) · doi:10.1109/ibssc47189.2019.8973095 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Xie, T., Liu, R., Chen, Y., & Liu, G. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2021.3129800 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Agente conversacional virtual: la inteligencia artificial para el aprendizaje autónomo
Rodríguez, J. A., Santana, M. G., Perera, V. A., & Pulido, J. R. (2021) · Pixel-Bit Revista de Medios y Educación · doi:10.12795/pixelbit.86171 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Jill Watson SA: Design and Evaluation of a Virtual Agent to Build Communities Among Online Learners
Wang, Q., Jing, S., Camacho, I., Joyner, D. A., & Goel, A. K. (2020) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3334480.3382878 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Using Learning Analytics to Explore Responses from Student Conversations with Chatbot for Education
Hamzah, W. M. A. F. W., Ismail, I., Yusof, M. K., Saany, S. I. A., & Yacob, A. (2021) · International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP) · doi:10.3991/ijep.v11i6.23475 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Using a Chatterbot as a FAQ Assistant in a Course about Computers Architecture
Mikic-Fonte, F. A., Nistal, M. L., & Rodríguez, M. C. (2018) · IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) · doi:10.1109/fie.2018.8659174 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Open knowledge interface: a digital assistant to support students in writing academic assignments
Resch, O., & Yankova, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSOFT International Workshop on Education through Advanced Software Engineering and Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1145/3340435.3342723 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
A Chatterbot Sensitive to Student's Context to Help on Software Engineering Education
Paschoal, L. N., de Oliveira, M. M., & Chicon, P. M. M. (2018) · Latin American Computer Conference (CLEI) · doi:10.1109/clei.2018.00105 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Motivational virtual agent in e-learning: the roles of regulatory focus and message framing
Tan, S.-M., Liew, T. W., & Gan, C. L. (2020) · Information and Learning Sciences · doi:10.1108/ils-09-2019-0088 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Ontology-based Integration of Knowledge Base for Building an Intelligent Searching Chatbot
Nguyen, H. D., Tran, T.-V., Pham, X.-T., Huynh, A. T., & Do, N. V. (2021) · Sensors and Materials · doi:10.18494/sam.2021.3264 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Smart Assistance for Students and People Living in a Campus
Gaglio, S., Re, G. L., Morana, M., et al. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Smart Computing · doi:10.1109/smartcomp.2019.00042 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Teacher reflection – call for a transformative mindset
Tay, L. Y., Tan, L. S., Aiyoob, T. B., Tan, J. Y., Ong, M. W. L., Lim-Ratnam, C., & Chua, P. H. (2022) · Reflective Practice · doi:10.1080/14623943.2022.2130224 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
An Intelligent Natural Language Conversational System for Academic Advising
Edward, M., & John, G. (2015) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2015.060116 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
A framework for building conversational agents based on a multi-expert model
Nakano, M., Funakoshi, K., Hasegawa, Y., et al. (2008) · doi:10.3115/1622064.1622081 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Scholten, M. R., Kelders, S. M., & van Gemert‐Pijnen, J. E. W. C. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01063 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
(2021) · doi:10.1007/s10916-021-01737-4 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Supporting peer assessment in education with conversational agents
Lee, Y., & Fu, W. (2019) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) · doi:10.1145/3308557.3308695 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Lee, H., Kanakogi, Y., & Hiraki, K. (2015) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.140361 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Jin, X., Bian, Y., Geng, W., et al. (2019) · IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR) · doi:10.1109/vr.2019.8797764 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Engaging students to fill surveys using chatbots: University case study
Belhaj, N., Hamdane, A., Chaoui, N. E. H., Chaoui, H., & Bekkali, M. E. (2021) · Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science · doi:10.11591/ijeecs.v24.i1.pp473-483 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Agent-Supported Peer Collaboration in MOOCs
Tegos, S. D., Mavridis, A., & Demetriadis, S. (2021) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2021.710856 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
A Systematic Identification of Pedagogical Conversational Agents
Paschoal, L. N., Krassmann, A. L., Nunes, F. B., de Oliveira, M. M., Bercht, M., Barbosa, E. F., & Souza, S. R. S. (2020) · IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) · doi:10.1109/fie44824.2020.9273813 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Analysis of conversational listening skills toward agent-based social skills training
Tanaka, H., Iwasaka, H., Negoro, H., & Nakamura, S. (2019) · Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces · doi:10.1007/s12193-019-00313-y · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Examining the Acceptance of Virtual Assistant - Vanika for University Students
Gunadi, D., Sanjaya, R., & Harnadi, B. (2019) · International Conference on Informatics and Computational Sciences (ICICoS) · doi:10.1109/icicos48119.2019.8982513 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Designing public financial management systems: exploring the use of chatbot-assisted case studies
Asquer, A., & Krachkovskaya, I. (2022) · Public Money & Management · doi:10.1080/09540962.2022.2069412 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Issues surrounding the introduction of formal student contracts
Gaffney‐Rhys, R., & Jones, J. (2009) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602930902977749 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Tashi-Bot: A Intelligent Personal Assistant for Users in an Educational InstitutionPreprint
Carlos, H., Sanchez-Torres, G., & Salcedo, D. (2021) · Preprints.org · doi:10.20944/preprints202108.0380.v1 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Zubani, M., Sigalini, L., Serina, I., Putelli, L., Gerevini, A., & Chiari, M. (2022) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi14020062 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
The use of chatbot as an element of tutorial action in university teaching
Valdivieso, P. Á. C. (2021) · ReiDoCrea Revista electrónica de investigación Docencia Creativa · doi:10.30827/digibug.69299 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Halan, S., Lok, B. C. L., Sia, I. K. M., et al. (2014) · IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) · doi:10.1109/icalt.2014.79 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Using virtual assistant for learning selected topics of Physics
Aguilar-Mejía, J. R., & Tejeda, S. (2020) · IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC) · doi:10.1109/isec49744.2020.9397822 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Virtual interactive consulting agent to support freshman students in transition to higher education
Lahav, O., Talis, V., Cinamon, R. G., & Rizzo, A. (2019) · Journal of Computing in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s12528-019-09237-8 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Development of Personalized Pedagogical Agent for Student-Centered e- Learning Environment
Maryadi, J. A., Santoso, H. B., & Isa, Y. K. (2017) · World Engineering Education Forum (WEEF) · doi:10.1109/weef.2017.8467028 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Toward an eclectic and malleable multiagent educational assistant
Briel, A. (2021) · Computer Applications in Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/cae.22449 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Voice’s Effect on Student Effort Ratings and Recall Performance While Under Cognitive Stress
Morris, T. W., & Chen, H.-T. M. (2021) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1071181321651070 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Who Makes Your Heart Beat? What Makes You Sweat? Social Conflict in Virtual Reality for Educators
Lee, M., Kolkmeier, J., Heylen, D., & IJsselsteijn, W. A. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.628246 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
The Effect of Pacing on Learners’ Perceptions of Pedagogical Agents
Schroeder, N. L., & Craig, S. D. (2017) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633116689790 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Gonçalves, G. S., Ribeiro, T. D. L. S., Teixeira, J. E. V., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Innovation · doi:10.5585/iji.v10i1.20652 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
The Influence of Voice on Pedagogical Agent’s Persona and Recall Performance
Morris, T. W., & Chen, H.-T. M. (2020) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1071181320641111 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Yarmak, O. V., Shkaiderova, T., Strashko, E. V., et al. (2021) · E3S Web of Conferences · doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202124411043 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Work-in-Progress—Virtual Agents in Teaching: A Study of Human Aspects
Jha, M., Richards, D., Porte, M., & Atif, A. (2020) · International Conference of the Immersive Learning Research Network (iLRN) · doi:10.23919/ilrn47897.2020.9155122 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Tan, C. P., Yeap, C. K., Chong, O. L., et al. (2021) · Artificial Intelligence and Cloud Computing Conference (AICCC) · doi:10.1145/3508259.3508292 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
A revolutionary approach in virtual learning
Ramachandiran, C. R., Mahmud, M. M., & Jomhari, N. (2019) · International Conference on e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning · doi:10.1145/3306500.3306522 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Conversational Forensics: Building Conversational Pedagogical Agents with Attitude
Fakinlede, I., Kumar, V., Wen, D., & Kinshuk (2013) · IEEE International Conference on Technology for Education (T4E) · doi:10.1109/t4e.2013.52 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Tao, X., Niu, Q., Jackson, M., et al. (2008) · IEEE International Symposium on IT in Medicine and Education (ITME) · doi:10.1109/itme.2008.4743901 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
HCI History and Today's Opportunities – What We Anticipated, What We Did Not
Grudin, J. T. (2021) · Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3411763.3445013 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Bell, A. (2023). Core connectivity: The key enabler of digital transformation Neos Networks. Neos Networks.
- Bickmore, T., Trinh, H., Hoppmann, M., & Asadi, R. (2016). Virtual agents in the classroom: Experience fielding a co-presenter agent in University courses. Intelligent Virtual Agents (pp. 154–163). Springer International Publishing. · DOI
- Brookfield, S. D. (2021). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Wiley.
- Chang, C.-Y., Kuo, S.-Y., & Hwang, G.-H. (2021). Chatbot-facilitated nursing education: Incorporating a knowledge-based chatbot system into a nursing training program. Educational Technology & Society, 25(1), 15–27.
- Dibitonto, M., Leszczynska, K., Tazzi, F., & Medaglia, C. M. (2018). Chatbot in a campus environment: Design of LiSA, a virtual assistant to help students in their university life. Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 103–116). Springer International Publishing.
- Feng, D., Jeong, D. C., Krämer, N. C., Miller, L. C., & Marsella, S. (2017). "Is It Just Me?": Evaluating attribution of negative feedback as a function of virtual instructor's gender and proxemics. AAMAS '17: Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, Brazil.
- Gupta, S., & Chen, Y. (2022). Supporting inclusive learning using chatbots? A chatbot-led interview study. Journal of Information Systems Education and Information Technologies, 33(1), 98–108.
- Hacker, P., Engel, A., & List, T. (2023). Understanding and regulating ChatGPT, and other large generative AI models. Verfassungsblog, 2366–7044. https://doaj-org.ezproxy.brunel.ac.uk/article/dd299f24915c4f6b8138f1c58647eb8f
- Hacker, A., & Dreifus, C. (2017). Higher education?: How colleges are wasting our money and failing our kids—and what we can do about it-AKA STRATEGY. Times books.
- Higher Education Statistics Agency. (2022). Higher education student statistics: UK, 2017/18-Student numbers and characteristics. HESA.
- Kitchenham, B. A., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. https://www.elsevier.com/__data/promis_misc/525444systematicreviewsguide.pdf
- Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.
- Komatani, K., Kanda, N., Nakano, M., Nakadai, K., Tsujino, H., Ogata, T., & Okuno, H. G. (2006). Multi-domain spoken dialogue system with extensibility and robustness against speech recognition errors. In J. Alexandersson & A. Knott (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th SIGdial workshop on discourse and dialogue Sydney. Association for computational linguistics.
- Lowe, R., Pow, N., Serban, I. V., & Pineau, J. (2016). The Ubuntu dialogue corpus: A large dataset for research inunstructured multi-turn dialogue systems. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1506.08909 · DOI
- Marín, D. P. (2014). 5 future trends (I): Pedagogical conversational agents. In K. Jasmin (Ed.), Information and communications technology (pp. 142–161). De Gruyter Open Poland.
- McConlogue, T. (2020). Assessment and feedback in higher education: A guide for teachers. London: UCL Press. · DOI
- Min, W., Park, K., Wiggins, J., Mott, B., Wiebe, E., Boyer, K. E., & Lester, J. (2019). Predicting dialogue breakdown in conversational pedagogical agents with multimodal LSTMs. In S. Isotani, E. Millán, A. Ogan, P. Hastings, B. McLaren, & R. Luckin (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Education. Springer.
- Modrzejewski, M., & Rokita, P. (2018). Critical analysis of conversational agent technology for intelligent customer Support and proposition of a new solution. Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing (pp. 723–733). Cham: Springer International Publishing. · DOI · Paper page
- Moon, J. A. (2004). A handbook of reflective and experiential learning: Theory and practice. Hoboken: RoutledgeFalmer.
- Moreno, R. (2004). Animated pedagogical agents in educational technology. Educational Technology, 44(6), 23–30.
- Rodrigues, C., Reis, A., Pereira, R., Martins, P., Sousa, J., & Pinto, T. (2022). A review of conversational agents in education technology and innovation in learning teaching and education. Springer.
- Zhao, R., Papangelis, A., & Cassell, J. (2014). Towards a dyadic computational model of rapport management for human-virtual agent interaction. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 514–527). International Publishing.
- Ziemke, T. (2023). Disentangling notions of embodiment. Workshop on Developmental Embodied Cognition, https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Disentangling-Notions-of-Embodiment-Ziemke/a3fb41f1b3591469775b4fd50944e887b975fbd8
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lin, X., & Tan, H. (2025) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems13100840 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yusuf, H., Money, A., & Daylamani-Zad, D.
- Affiliations
- Brunel University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Yusuf, Habeeb
- Money, Arthur
- Daylamani-Zad, Damon
- Venue
- Educational technology research and development
- Published
- 2025-01-15
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 815-874
- ISSN
- 1042-1629 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-6501
- OpenAlex
- W4406423087
- Semantic Scholar
- d0944ed94452ffd45bc10dcec8832efa19e4b145
- Cited by
- 112
- References
- 123
- Citations by year
- 2026: 76 · 2025: 36
- FWCI
- 116.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Educational Technology Research and Development (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
- Keywords
- AI chatbots in education, higher education, conceptual framework, pastoral support, pedagogical support, cognitive support, personalization, media richness, assessment, reflective practice, Web3, research gaps
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review