The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rapyuta: A Cloud Robotics Platform
Abstract
In this paper, we present the design and implementation of Rapyuta, an open-source cloud robotics platform. Rapyuta helps robots to offload heavy computation by providing secured customizable computing environments in the cloud. The computing environments also allow the robots to easily access the RoboEarth knowledge repository. Furthermore, these computing environments are tightly interconnected, paving the way for deployment of robotic teams. We also describe three typical use cases, some benchmarking and performance results, and two proof-of-concept demonstrations. Note to Practitioners - Rapyuta allows to outsource some or all of a robot's onboard computational processes to a commercial data center. Its main difference to other, similar frameworks like the Google App Engine is that it is specifically tailored towards multiprocess high-bandwidth robotics applications/middlewares and provides a well-documented open-source implementation that can be modified to cover a large variety of robotic scenarios. Rapyuta supports the outsourcing of almost all of the current 3000+ ROS packages out of the box and is easily extensible to other robotic middleware. A pre-installed Amazon Machine Image (AMI) is provided that allows to launch Rapyuta in any of Amazon's data center within minutes. Once launched, robots can authenticate themselves to Rapyuta, create one or more secured computational environments in the cloud and launch the desired nodes/processes. The computing environments can also be arbitrarily connected to build parallel computing architectures on the fly. The WebSocket-based communication protocol, which provides synchronous and asynchronous communication mechanisms, allows not only ROS based robots, but also browsers and mobiles phones to connect to the ecosystem. Rapyuta's computing environments are private, secure, and optimized for data throughput. However, its performance is in large part determined by the latency and quality of the network connection and the performance of the data center. Optimizing performance under these constraints is typically highly application-specific. The paper illustrates an example of performance optimization in a collaborative real-time 3-D mapping application. Other target applications include collaborative 3-D mapping, task/grasp planning, object recognition, localization, and teleoperation, among others.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The NIST definition of cloud computing
Mell, P. M., & Grance, T. (2011) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-145 · Cited by 11,795
ROS: an open-source Robot Operating System
Quigley, M. (2009) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · Cited by 8,729
3D is here: Point Cloud Library (PCL)
Rusu, R. B., & Cousins, S. (2011) · 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation · doi:10.1109/icra.2011.5980567 · Cited by 4,885
The Hadoop Distributed File System
Shvachko, K., Kuang, H., Radia, S., & Chansler, R. (2010) · 2010 IEEE 26th Symposium on Mass Storage Systems and Technologies (MSST) · doi:10.1109/msst.2010.5496972 · Cited by 4,834
KinectFusion: Real-time dense surface mapping and tracking
Newcombe, R. A., Fitzgibbon, A., Izadi, S., Hilliges, O., Molyneaux, D., Kim, D., Davison, A. J., Kohi, P., Shotton, J., & Hodges, S. (2011) · 2011 10th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality · doi:10.1109/ismar.2011.6092378 · Cited by 4,008
Probabilistic Robotics (Intelligent Robotics and Autonomous Agents)
Thrun, S., Burgard, W., & Fox, D. (2005) · The MIT Press eBooks · Cited by 1,422
Coordinating hundreds of cooperative, autonomous vehicles in warehouses
Wurman, P. R., & Mountz, M. (2008) · Cited by 835
(2008) · Developing with Google App Engine · doi:10.1007/978-1-4302-1832-6_1 · Cited by 610
Fette, I., & Melnikov, A. (2011) · doi:10.17487/rfc6455 · Cited by 571
Cloud robotics: architecture, challenges and applications
Hu, G., Tay, W., & Wen, Y. (2012) · IEEE Network · doi:10.1109/mnet.2012.6201212 · Cited by 488
Cited by
Simultaneous Localization and Mapping: A Survey of Current Trends in Autonomous Driving
Bresson, G., Alsayed, Z., Yu, L., & Glaser, S. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles · doi:10.1109/tiv.2017.2749181 · Cited by 885
A Survey of Research on Cloud Robotics and Automation
Kehoe, B., Patil, S., Abbeel, P., & Goldberg, K. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering · doi:10.1109/tase.2014.2376492 · Cited by 833
When UAV Swarm Meets Edge-Cloud Computing: The QoS Perspective
Chen, W., Liu, B., Huang, H., Guo, S., & Zheng, Z. (2019) · IEEE Network · doi:10.1109/mnet.2019.1800222 · Cited by 184
A Fog Robotic System for Dynamic Visual Servoing
Tian, N., Chen, J., Ma, M., Zhang, R., Huang, B., Goldberg, K., & Sojoudi, S. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1809.06716 · Cited by 49
(2020) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Mohanarajah, G., Hunziker, D., D'Andrea, R., & Waibel, M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering
- Published
- 2015-04
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 481-493
- ISSN
- 1545-5955 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-3783
- OpenAlex
- W2094017627
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 27.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rapyuta: A Cloud Robotics Platform. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tase.2014.2329556
- The paper
- Mohanarajah, G., Hunziker, D., D'Andrea, R., & Waibel, M. (2015). Rapyuta: A Cloud Robotics Platform. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tase.2014.2329556
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.