Cited by 22Topic ModelingNatural Language Processing TechniquesSentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining

SemGloVe: Semantic Co-Occurrences for GloVe From BERT

Open access
Gan, Leilei, Teng, Zhiyang, Zhang, Yue, Zhu, Linchao, Wu, Fei, Yang, Yi·2022·IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing

Abstract

GloVe learns word embeddings by leveraging statistical information from word co-occurrence matrices. However, word pairs in the matrices are extracted from a predefined local context window, which might lead to limited word pairs and potentially semantic irrelevant word pairs. In this paper, we proposeSemGloVe, which distillssemantic co-occurrencesfrom BERT into static GloVe word embeddings. Particularly, we propose two models to extract co-occurrence statistics based on either the masked language model or the multi-head attention weights of BERT. Our methods can extract word pairs limited by the local window assumption, and can define the co-occurrence weights by directly considering the semantic distance between word pairs. Experiments on several word similarity datasets and external tasks show that SemGloVe can outperform GloVe.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/taslp.2022.3197316

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GloVe utilizes word co-occurrence data or global statistics to infer semantic relationships between words in the corpus, as opposed to word2vec's dependence on local context windows.

    “The GloVe algorithm utilizes word co-occurrence data or global statistics to infer semantic relationships between words in the corpus, as opposed to word2vec's dependence on local context windows for deriving these associations (Badri et al. 2022; Gan et al. 2022; Curto et al. 2022).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gan, L., Teng, Z., Zhang, Y., Zhu, L., Wu, F., & Yang, Y.
Affiliations
  • Zhejiang University (CN)
  • Westlake University (CN)
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
  • Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CN)
Venue
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing
Published
2022
Volume
30
Pages
2696-2704
ISSN
  • 2329-9290 (ISSN-L)
  • 2329-9304
OpenAlex
W3113816342
Cited by
22
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (62037001)
  • Ministry of Science and Technology (2020 YFC 0832500)
  • Zhejiang Province Key Project (2022SDXHDX0003)
  • Zhejiang Province Science and Technology Project (2022C01044)
  • Starry Night Science Fund of Zhejiang University Shanghai Institute for Advanced Study (SN-ZJU-SIAS-0010)
  • CAAI-Huawei MindSpore Open Fund (CAAIXSJLJJ-2021-015A, CAAIXSJLJJ-2021-046A)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Keywords
gloves, word embeddings, BERT, masked language models, multi-head attention, word similarity, knowledge distillation, static word embeddings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review