Cited by 111EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringMuscle activation and electromyography studies

Ascertaining the Importance of Neurons to Develop Better Brain-Machine Interfaces

Sanchez, J.C., Carmena, J.M., Lebedev, M.A., Nicolelis, M.A.L., Harris, J.G., Principe, J.C.·2004·IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

In the design of brain-machine interface (BMI) algorithms, the activity of hundreds of chronically recorded neurons is used to reconstruct a variety of kinematic variables. A significant problem introduced with the use of neural ensemble inputs for model building is the explosion in the number of free parameters. Large models not only affect model generalization but also put a computational burden on computing an optimal solution especially when the goal is to implement the BMI in low-power, portable hardware. In this paper, three methods are presented to quantitatively rate the importance of neurons in neural to motor mapping, using single neuron correlation analysis, sensitivity analysis through a vector linear model, and a model-independent cellular directional tuning analysis for comparisons purpose. Although, the rankings are not identical, up to sixty percent of the top 10 ranking cells were in common. This set can then be used to determine a reduced-order model whose performance is similar to that of the ensemble. It is further shown that by pruning the initial ensemble neural input with the ranked importance of cells, a reduced sets of cells (between 40 and 80, depending upon the methods) can be found that exceed the BMI performance levels of the full ensemble.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tbme.2004.827061

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multiplexing a high-density electrode array to a smaller amplifier array is a widely used resource-sharing technique that relies on not all electrode sites providing useful information after implantation or on necessary information being obtainable from a small subset, although the useful subset is not known in advance.

    “The first widely used technique consists of multiplexing a high-density electrode array to a much smaller amplifier array. This strategy leverages the fact that not all electrode sites may provide useful information after implantation [97, 101, 145] or that the necessary information can be obtained from a small subset of electrodes, although the useful electrode subset is not known a priori [118].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sanchez, J. C., Carmena, J. M., Lebedev, M. A., Nicolelis, M. A. L., Harris, J. G., & Principe, J. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Published
2004-06
Volume
51
Issue
6
Pages
943-953
ISSN
0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2103554020
Cited by
111
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Universidade de São Paulo
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Keywords
brain-computer interface, model reduction, sensitivity analysis, model generalization, low-power electronics
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Algorithms, Animals, Cerebral Cortex, Computer Simulation, Electroencephalography, Female, Hand, Macaca, Models, Neurological, Movement, Nerve Net, Neurons, Sensitivity and Specificity, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, User-Computer Interface, Reproducibility of Results, Models, Statistical, Likelihood Functions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review