Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 3,024

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

BCI2000: A General-Purpose Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) System

Schalk, G., McFarland, D.J., Hinterberger, T., Birbaumer, N., Wolpaw, J.R.·2004·IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

Many laboratories have begun to develop brain-computer interface (BCI) systems that provide communication and control capabilities to people with severe motor disabilities. Further progress and realization of practical applications depends on systematic evaluations and comparisons of different brain signals, recording methods, processing algorithms, output formats, and operating protocols. However, the typical BCI system is designed specifically for one particular BCI method and is, therefore, not suited to the systematic studies that are essential for continued progress. In response to this problem, we have developed a documented general-purpose BCI research and development platform called BCI2000. BCI2000 can incorporate alone or in combination any brain signals, signal processing methods, output devices, and operating protocols. This report is intended to describe to investigators, biomedical engineers, and computer scientists the concepts that the BC12000 system is based upon and gives examples of successful BCI implementations using this system. To date, we have used BCI2000 to create BCI systems for a variety of brain signals, processing methods, and applications. The data show that these systems function well in online operation and that BCI2000 satisfies the stringent real-time requirements of BCI systems. By substantially reducing labor and cost, BCI2000 facilitates the implementation of different BCI systems and other psychophysiological experiments. It is available with full documentation and free of charge for research or educational purposes and is currently being used in a variety of studies by many research groups.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tbme.2004.827072

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. 10.1016/0013-4694(88)90149-6 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/0013-4694(91)90040-B · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/0745-7138(92)90045-7 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.3758/BF03327130 · DOI
  5. 10.1006/jmca.1993.1030 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1007/s002210050617 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1109/86.847815 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1109/86.847823 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1037//0033-2909.127.3.358 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1109/TRE.2000.847807 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1109/7333.918276 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Bayliss, 2001, A Flexible brain-computer interface
  13. Bianchi, 2003, Introducing BF++: A C++ framework for cognitive bio-feedback systems design, Meth. Inform. Med., 42, 102
  14. 10.1109/TNSRE.2003.810426 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/0013-4694(80)90265-5 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/0013-4694(80)90265-5 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Elbert, 1984, Springer-Verlag
  18. Perelmouter, 1999, Language support program for thought-translation-devices, Automedica, 18, 67
  19. 10.1109/86.847821 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1109/86.847817 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/S0013-4694(97)00022-2 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1073/pnas.94.20.10979 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1109/86.895946 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1016/S0920-1211(96)00082-4 · DOI
  25. Hinterberger, 1999, Entwicklung und Optimierung eines Gehirn-Computer-Interfaces mit langsamen Hirnpotentialen
  26. 10.3758/BF03200585 · DOI
  27. 10.1515/bmte.1997.42.9.226 · DOI
  28. 10.1023/A:1024685214655 · DOI
  29. 10.1109/86.847812 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Vaughan, 2001, EEG-based brain-computer-interface: Development of a speller, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 27, 167
  31. 10.1016/S0301-0511(03)00073-5 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Wolpaw, 2003, Two-dimensional movement control by scalp-recorded sensorimotor rhythms in humans, Abstract Viewer/Itinerary Planner, Soc. Neuroscience Abstr.
  33. 10.1023/A:1023437823106 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1109/86.847808 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Pfurtscheller, 1999, EEG event-related desynchronization (ERD) and event-related synchronization (ERS), 958
  36. 10.1016/0013-4694(94)90135-X · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1016/S0013-4694(98)00107-2 · DOI
  38. 10.1109/86.847816 · DOI
  39. Sharbrough, 1991, American electroencephalographic society guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature, Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 8, 200
  40. Birbaumer, 1997, Slow cortical potentials: Their origin, meaning, and clinical use, 25
  41. 10.1038/203380a0 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1126/science.150.3700.1187 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1016/0013-4694(70)90124-0 · DOI
  44. Allison, 2003, P3 or Not P3: Toward a better P300 BCI
  45. 10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00457-0 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1109/86.847809 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1109/86.847813 · DOI
  48. Hinterberger, 2001, The thought translation device and its applications to the completely paralyzed

Cited by

See all 3,024

Metadata

Authors
Schalk, G., McFarland, D. J., Hinterberger, T., Birbaumer, N., & Wolpaw, J. R.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Published
2004-06
Volume
51
Issue
6
Pages
1034-1043
ISSN
0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2151669316
Cited by
3,024
References
3
FWCI
18.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.