The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Combined Optimization of Spatial and Temporal Filters for Improving Brain-Computer Interfacing
Abstract
Brain-computer interface (BCI) systems create a novel communication channel from the brain to an output device by bypassing conventional motor output pathways of nerves and muscles. Therefore they could provide a new communication and control option for paralyzed patients. Modern BCI technology is essentially based on techniques for the classification of single-trial brain signals. Here we present a novel technique that allows the simultaneous optimization of a spatial and a spectral filter enhancing discriminability rates of multichannel EEG single-trials. The evaluation of 60 experiments involving 22 different subjects demonstrates the significant superiority of the proposed algorithm over to its classical counterpart: the median classification error rate was decreased by 11%. Apart from the enhanced classification, the spatial and/or the spectral filter that are determined by the algorithm can also be used for further analysis of the data, e.g., for source localization of the respective brain rhythms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control
Wolpaw, J. R., Birbaumer, N., McFarland, D. J., Pfurtscheller, G., & Vaughan, T. M. (2002) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00057-3 · Cited by 7,927
A spelling device for the paralysed
Birbaumer, N., Ghanayim, N., Hinterberger, T., Iversen, I., Kotchoubey, B., Kübler, A., Perelmouter, J., Taub, E., & Flor, H. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/18581 · Cited by 1,577
Curran, E. (2003) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0278-2626(03)00036-8 · Cited by 417
Cited by
A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain–computer interfaces: A 10 year update
Lotte, F., Bougrain, L., Cichocki, A., Clerc, M., Congedo, M., Rakotomamonjy, A., & Yger, F. (2018) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/aab2f2 · Cited by 2,239
Brain Computer Interfaces, a Review
Nicolas-Alonso, L. F., & Gomez-Gil, J. (2012) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s120201211 · Cited by 2,143
Filter Bank Common Spatial Pattern (FBCSP) in Brain-Computer Interface
Ang, K. K., Chin, Z. Y., Zhang, H., & Guan, C. (2008) · 2008 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2008.4634130 · Cited by 1,514
Filter Bank Common Spatial Pattern Algorithm on BCI Competition IV Datasets 2a and 2b
Ang, K. K., Chin, Z. Y., Wang, C., Guan, C., & Zhang, H. (2012) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2012.00039 · Cited by 1,264
BCILAB: a platform for brain–computer interface development
Kothe, C. A., & Makeig, S. (2013) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/10/5/056014 · Cited by 412
Metadata
- Authors
- Dornhege, G., Blankertz, B., Krauledat, M., Losch, F., Curio, G., & Muller, K.-R.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 2006-11
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2274-2281
- ISSN
- 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2531
- OpenAlex
- W2165892205
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
