Cited by 35Silicon Carbide Semiconductor TechnologiesElectronic Packaging and Soldering TechnologiesGaN-based semiconductor devices and materials

Effects of Die-Attach Voids on the Thermal Impedance of Power Electronic Packages

Singh, Sujay, Hao, Jifa, Hoffman, Daniel, Dixon, Thomas, Zedolik, Andrew, Fazio, Joe, Kopley, Thomas E.·2017·IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology

Abstract

Thermal runaway is among the major failure mechanisms of power semiconductor packages. Thermal dissipation of power electronics depends on the quality of the solder die-attach, any defects such as voids, and delamination-impede heat dissipation that results in hot spots that can cause thermal runaway and/or a premature device failure. Therefore, investigation of thermal impact due to die-attach defects is indispensable for improved device performance and reliability. In this paper, transient dual interface measurement is used to characterize the thermal path of a power electronic package consisting of an insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT) and copack diode. The die-attach defects were identified by X-ray imaging. The impact of voids on thermal dissipation was quantified by junction-to-case thermal resistance and structure function analysis. The junction-to-case thermal resistance (IGBT) values were found to be increasing with the increase in void%. The largest void% instead of the total void% has a greater impact on the thermal dissipation of the devices. However, die-attach voids under the IGBT die have no impact on junction-to-case thermal resistance (diode), suggesting that the copack diode heat path is independent of the IGBT heat path.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tcpmt.2017.2742467

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singh, S., Hao, J., Hoffman, D., Dixon, T., Zedolik, A., Fazio, J., & Kopley, T. E.
Affiliations
ON Semiconductor (United States) (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology
Published
2017-10
Volume
7
Issue
10
Pages
1608-1616
ISSN
  • 2156-3950 (ISSN-L)
  • 2156-3985
OpenAlex
W2754799743
Cited by
35
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Components Packaging and Manufacturing Technology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Technology and Device Reliability Department, ON Semiconductor
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials
Keywords
thermal impedance, thermal runaway, IGBT, junction-to-case thermal resistance, structure-function analysis, radiography, package reliability, heat dissipation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review