Cited by 8Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design

Double-high-pass-filter-based electrical-recording front-ends and fluorescence-recording front-ends for monitoring multimodal neural activity.

Lee, Taeju, Je, Minkyu·2020·IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs

Abstract

This brief presents a multimodal neural activity monitoring system consisting of a double-high-pass-filter-based electrical-recording front-end and a fluorescence-recording frontend. The proposed electrical-recording circuit based on double high-pass filters is implemented by placing a narrow-band buffer in the feedback path of the low-noise and programmable-gain amplifiers so that low-frequency artifacts can be sufficiently suppressed during the electrical and fluorescence recording. The implemented system successfully measures the electrical signals and calcium ions in vivo for studying heterogeneous cell populations. For electrical recording, the front-end consumes the power of 2 μW/channel and achieves the input-referred noise of 2.9 μVrms. The high-pass cutoff frequency can be programmed from sub-1 Hz to about 300 Hz using the function of double high-pass filtering. For fluorescence recording, the front-end consumes the power of 10.8 μW/block and occupies the area of 0.18 mm2/block.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tcsii.2020.2980009

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The artifact is typically hundreds of millivolts in amplitude, and 10 to 100 times higher than the amplitude of the recorded neural signals.

    “The artifact is typically hundreds of millivolts in amplitude, and 10 to 100 times higher than the amplitude of the recorded neural signals (Dabbaghian et al., 2019; Lee and Je, 2020).”

    From Advances in Neural Recording and Stimulation Integrated Circuits (2021) · cites this paper as Lee and Je, 2020

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, T., & Je, M.
Affiliations
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs
Published
2020-05
Volume
67
Issue
5
Pages
876-880
ISSN
  • 1549-7747 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-3791
OpenAlex
W3010802056
Cited by
8
References
9
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Circuits & Systems II Express Briefs (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Brain Research Program (2017M3C7A1028859)
  • Convergence Technology Development Program for Bionic Arm through the National Research Foundation of Korea
  • Ministry of Science & ICT (2017M3C1B2085296)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Radio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Keywords
low-power analog circuits, calcium imaging, programmable gain amplifier, input-referred noise, heterogeneous cell populations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review