Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 257

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 94 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Suicidal Ideation Detection: A Review of Machine Learning Methods and Applications

Open access
Ji, Shaoxiong, Pan, Shirui, Li, Xue, Cambria, Erik, Long, Guodong, Huang, Zi·2021·IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems

Abstract

Suicide is a critical issue in modern society. Early detection and prevention of suicide attempts should be addressed to save people's life. Current suicidal ideation detection (SID) methods include clinical methods based on the interaction between social workers or experts and the targeted individuals and machine learning techniques with feature engineering or deep learning for automatic detection based on online social contents. This article is the first survey that comprehensively introduces and discusses the methods from these categories. Domain-specific applications of SID are reviewed according to their data sources, i.e., questionnaires, electronic health records, suicide notes, and online user content. Several specific tasks and data sets are introduced and summarized to facilitate further research. Finally, we summarize the limitations of current work and provide an outlook of further research directions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tcss.2020.3021467

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 94 references

Cited by

See all 257

Metadata

Authors
Ji, S., Pan, S., Li, X., Cambria, E., Long, G., & Huang, Z.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems
Published
2021-02
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
214-226
ISSN
  • 2329-924X (ISSN-L)
  • 2373-7476
OpenAlex
W2981984641
Cited by
257
References
94
FWCI
38.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Suicidal Ideation Detection: A Review of Machine Learning Methods and Applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tcss.2020.3021467
The paper
Ji, S., Pan, S., Li, X., Cambria, E., Long, G., & Huang, Z. (2021). Suicidal Ideation Detection: A Review of Machine Learning Methods and Applications. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcss.2020.3021467

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.